Imprecise quantum steering inequalities in tripartite systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22986v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:23:44 GMT
• Title: Imprecise quantum steering inequalities in tripartite systems
• Abstract summary: Even small measurement errors can significantly compromise the certification of quantum steerability.<n>Our results underscore the critical need to account for measurement imperfections in experimental quantum steering.
• Score: 5.099265690409781
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Quantum steering, as a manifestation of nonlocal quantum correlations, plays a crucial role in enabling various quantum information processing tasks. However, practical implementations are often hindered by significant challenges arising from imperfect or untrusted measurement devices. This study investigates the impact of measurement inaccuracies on quantum steering, with a particular focus on errors in the untrusted party's measurement devices. We first analyze how such errors affect the evaluation of steering inequalities, and then derive bipartite steering inequalities based on correlation matrices under imperfect measurements. Our findings show that even small measurement errors can significantly compromise the certification of quantum steerability, an effect that becomes particularly pronounced as the system dimension increases. Furthermore, by extending the proposed steering inequality to a modified tripartite scenario via correlation matrices, we demonstrate that the influence of measurement imperfections is far more severe in multipartite quantum steering than in the bipartite case. Our results underscore the critical need to account for measurement imperfections in experimental quantum steering and provide a theoretical framework for characterizing and mitigating these effects in high-dimensional quantum systems.

Related papers

• Faking entanglement with imperceptible measurement deviations [0.0]
  Experimental schemes usually rely on the assumption that quantum measurements can be realized exactly.<n>We demonstrate that arbitrarily small measurement errors, when adversarially encoded in the measurement apparatus, can lead to the false certification of high-dimensional entanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T15:49:58Z)
• Multipartite steering verification with imprecise measurements [4.408612042177465]
  Quantum steering is a fundamental quantum correlation that plays a pivotal role in quantum technologies.<n>We develop a quantitative method that effectively eliminates false positives induced by measurement imprecision.<n>Results substantially enhance the robustness of multipartite steering and entanglement verification against measurement imprecision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T00:09:22Z)
• Efficient utilization of imaginarity in quantum steering [0.9238700679836854]
  We illustrate the role of complex numbers in quantum information processing through the phenomenon of quantum steering.<n>We formulate a steering criterion for bipartite qubit systems, which requires two dichotomic measurements at the untrusted side and two mutually unbiased bases at the trusted side.<n>We show that quantum correlations embodied through our proposed imaginarity steering inequality can be witnessed by suitably constructed Hermitian operators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-23T20:44:07Z)
• Measurement incompatibility under loss [0.0]
  We investigate the measurement incompatibility of continuous-variable systems with infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces under the influence of pure losses.<n>We show that loss channels with transmissivities less than $1/n$ make any set of $n$ measurements compatible.<n>We design a set of measurements that remains incompatible even under extreme losses, where the number of measurements in the set increases with the amount of loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T19:06:42Z)
• Effect of the readout efficiency of quantum measurement on the system entanglement [44.99833362998488]
  We quantify the entanglement for a particle on a 1d quantum random walk under inefficient monitoring. We find that the system's maximal mean entanglement at the measurement-induced quantum-to-classical crossover is in different ways by the measurement strength and inefficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T18:10:05Z)
• Quantum steering with imprecise measurements [0.0]
  We show that small measurement imprecision can have a large detrimental influence in terms of false positives for steering inequalities. We then introduce a method for taking generic measurement imprecision into account in tests of bipartite steering inequalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T14:52:40Z)
• Distrustful quantum steering [0.0]
  Quantum steering is an asymmetric form of quantum nonlocality where one can trust the measurements of one of the parties. We show that even a small distrust on Alice might cause the parties to observe steerability even if the quantum state is unsteerable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T14:31:52Z)
• Transition Role of Entangled Data in Quantum Machine Learning [51.6526011493678]
  Entanglement serves as the resource to empower quantum computing. Recent progress has highlighted its positive impact on learning quantum dynamics. We establish a quantum no-free-lunch (NFL) theorem for learning quantum dynamics using entangled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T08:06:43Z)
• High-dimensional entanglement certification: bounding relative entropy of entanglement in $2d+1$ experiment-friendly measurements [77.34726150561087]
  Entanglement -- the coherent correlations between parties in a quantum system -- is well-understood and quantifiable. Despite the utility of such systems, methods for quantifying high-dimensional entanglement are more limited and experimentally challenging. We present a novel certification method whose measurement requirements scale linearly with dimension subsystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T16:52:21Z)
• Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
  We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application. We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor. This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z)
• Analytical and experimental study of center line miscalibrations in M\o lmer-S\o rensen gates [51.93099889384597]
  We study a systematic perturbative expansion in miscalibrated parameters of the Molmer-Sorensen entangling gate. We compute the gate evolution operator which allows us to obtain relevant key properties. We verify the predictions from our model by benchmarking them against measurements in a trapped-ion quantum processor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-10T10:56:16Z)
• Experimental violations of Leggett-Garg's inequalities on a quantum computer [77.34726150561087]
  We experimentally observe the violations of Leggett-Garg-Bell's inequalities on single and multi-qubit systems. Our analysis highlights the limits of nowadays quantum platforms, showing that the above-mentioned correlation functions deviate from theoretical prediction as the number of qubits and the depth of the circuit grow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:35:15Z)
• Crosstalk Suppression for Fault-tolerant Quantum Error Correction with Trapped Ions [62.997667081978825]
  We present a study of crosstalk errors in a quantum-computing architecture based on a single string of ions confined by a radio-frequency trap, and manipulated by individually-addressed laser beams. This type of errors affects spectator qubits that, ideally, should remain unaltered during the application of single- and two-qubit quantum gates addressed at a different set of active qubits. We microscopically model crosstalk errors from first principles and present a detailed study showing the importance of using a coherent vs incoherent error modelling and, moreover, discuss strategies to actively suppress this crosstalk at the gate level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T14:20:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.