Modeling the Disjunction Effect within Classical Probability: A New Decision Process Model and Comparison with Quantum-like Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23233v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:05:25 GMT
• Title: Modeling the Disjunction Effect within Classical Probability: A New Decision Process Model and Comparison with Quantum-like Models
• Abstract summary: We re-examine the claim for the Prisoner's Dilemma disjunction effect.<n>Under the quantum-like event semantics, ambiguous pure states are generic.<n>We prove that for any such triple produced by a standard quantum-like model of the same experiment, there exists a classical instance reproducing it exactly.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The disjunction effect in human decision making is often taken to show that the classical law of total probability is violated, motivating quantum-like models. We re-examine this claim for the Prisoner's Dilemma disjunction effect. Under the mental-event reading of the opponent-choice events, the conventional classical decision-process model implicitly builds in a certainty-only premise: its standard partition assumptions leave no room for ambiguity, forcing every participant to be certain that the opponent will defect or will cooperate. We relax this by introducing a new classical model in which each participant carries a continuous expectation parameter representing the anticipated likelihood of opponent defection, and the participant pool is partitioned by expectation level; the resulting ambiguity set is precisely the union of the interior expectation bins. In contrast, under the quantum-like event semantics, ambiguous pure states are generic (dense and of full unitarily invariant measure on the unit sphere), so "certainty states" are mathematically exceptional. We prove that an instance of our classical model can realize any empirically observed triple of defection rates across the three information conditions, including strong disjunction-effect patterns, while strictly obeying the classical law of total probability. We further prove that for any such triple produced by a standard quantum-like model of the same experiment, there exists a classical instance reproducing it exactly. In this sense, classical and quantum-like approaches have the same observable-rate expressiveness; their substantive difference lies in how ambiguity is represented and in their respective event semantics, not in a breakdown of classical probability.

Related papers

• Quantum Visual Word Sense Disambiguation: Unraveling Ambiguities Through Quantum Inference Model [51.75804843502132]
  This paper proposes a Quantum Inference Model for Unsupervised Visual Word Sense Disambiguation (Q-VWSD)<n>It encodes multiple glosses of the target word into a superposition state to mitigate semantic biases.<n>By formalizing our method, we find that Q-VWSD is a quantum generalization of the method based on classical probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-31T07:47:14Z)
• A contextual advantage for conclusive exclusion: repurposing the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph construction [0.0]
  We show that there is a quantum-over-classical advantage for how well one can achieve conclusive exclusion.<n>We derive noise-robust noncontextuality inequalities bounding the conclusiveness of exclusion, and describe a quantum violation of these.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T19:00:05Z)
• Hidden correlations in quantum jumps: A theory of individual trials [0.43995631888847014]
  We develop a hidden variable formulation that reveals hidden correlations in individual trials.<n>We represent jump sequences as logical propositions on energy eigenstate occupations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-14T14:05:50Z)
• Testing trajectory-based determinism via time probability distributions [41.99844472131922]
  We introduce a prescription for constructing an arrival-time probability distribution within generic trajectory-equipped theories.<n>We derive a conditional probability distribution that is unreachable by quantum mechanics.<n>Our results can be tested experimentally, thereby assessing the validity of trajectory-based determinism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T11:36:38Z)
• A Semantics for Counterfactuals in Quantum Causal Models [0.0]
  We introduce a formalism for the evaluation of counterfactual queries in the framework of quantum causal models. We define a suitable extension of Pearl's notion of a 'classical structural causal model' We show that every classical (probabilistic) structural causal model can be extended to a quantum structural causal model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T05:00:14Z)
• Experimental Test of Contextuality based on State Discrimination with a Single Qubit [16.530085733940528]
  We extend the scope of experimental test of contextuality to a minimal quantum system of only two states (qubit) We observe a substantial violation of a no-go inequality derived by assuming non-contextuality. We also quantify the contextual advantage of state discrimination and the tolerance against quantum noises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T04:03:04Z)
• Experimentally adjudicating between different causal accounts of Bell inequality violations via statistical model selection [0.0]
  Bell inequalities follow from a set of seemingly natural assumptions about how to provide a causal model of a Bell experiment. Two types of causal models that modify some of these assumptions have been proposed. We seek to adjudicate between these alternatives based on their predictive power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-30T19:33:02Z)
• A quantum prediction as a collection of epistemically restricted classical predictions [0.0]
  We show how the quantum description of an experiment can be decomposed into classical descriptions. One recovers the quantum prediction via a simple but highly nonclassical rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-06T16:55:54Z)
• Quantum Cognitively Motivated Decision Fusion for Video Sentiment Analysis [22.701975963984378]
  We show that the sentiment judgment from one modality could be incompatible with the judgment from another. We propose a fundamentally new, quantum cognitively motivated fusion strategy for predicting sentiment judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-12T11:06:04Z)
• Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe [68.8204255655161]
  Three notions are often assumed to be essentially equivalent, representing different facets of the same phenomenon. We analyze them in general Friedmann-Lemaitre- Robertson-Walker space-times through the lens of geometric structures on the classical phase space. The analysis shows that: (i) inflation does not play an essential role; classical behavior can emerge much more generally; (ii) the three notions are conceptually distinct; classicality can emerge in one sense but not in another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T16:38:25Z)
• Quantum-secure message authentication via blind-unforgeability [74.7729810207187]
  We propose a natural definition of unforgeability against quantum adversaries called blind unforgeability. This notion defines a function to be predictable if there exists an adversary who can use "partially blinded" access to predict values. We show the suitability of blind unforgeability for supporting canonical constructions and reductions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2018-03-10T05:31:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.