OmniACBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Context-Grounded Acoustic Control in Omni-Modal Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23938v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 05:00:51 GMT
• Title: OmniACBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Context-Grounded Acoustic Control in Omni-Modal Models
• Abstract summary: We introduce OmniACBench, a benchmark for evaluating context-grounded acoustic control in omni-modal models.<n>Given a spoken instruction, a text script, and an image, a model must read the script aloud with an appropriate tone and manner.<n>Experiments on eight models reveal their limitations in the proposed setting, despite their strong performance on prior textual-output evaluations.
• Score: 17.817469065260124
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Most testbeds for omni-modal models assess multimodal understanding via textual outputs, leaving it unclear whether these models can properly speak their answers. To study this, we introduce OmniACBench, a benchmark for evaluating context-grounded acoustic control in omni-modal models. Given a spoken instruction, a text script, and an image, a model must read the script aloud with an appropriate tone and manner. OmniACBench comprises 3,559 verified instances covering six acoustic features: speech rate, phonation, pronunciation, emotion, global accent, and timbre. Extensive experiments on eight models reveal their limitations in the proposed setting, despite their strong performance on prior textual-output evaluations. Our analyses show that the main bottleneck lies not in processing individual modalities, but in integrating multimodal context for faithful speech generation. Moreover, we identify three common failure modes-weak direct control, failed implicit inference, and failed multimodal grounding-providing insights for developing models that can verbalize responses effectively.

Related papers

• OmniPro: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Omni-Proactive Streaming Video Understanding [17.161087166882744]
  We present OmniPro, the first benchmark to jointly evaluate omni-modal perception, proactive responding, and diverse video understanding tasks.<n>It comprises 2,700 human-verified samples spanning 9 sub-tasks and 3 cognitive levels, covering 6 basic video understanding capabilities.<n> Notably, 84% of samples require audio signals (speech or non-speech), and each sample is annotated with modality-isolation labels to enable fine-grained multimodal analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T15:55:22Z)
• DEAF: A Benchmark for Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness in Audio Language Models [15.637236155997]
  Recent Audio Multimodal Large Language Models (Audio MLLMs) demonstrate impressive performance on speech benchmarks.<n>It remains unclear whether these models genuinely process acoustic signals or rely on text-based semantic inference.<n>We introduce DEAF, a benchmark of over 2,700 conflict stimuli spanning three acoustic dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T15:52:26Z)
• AHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Audio-Language Models [78.20477815156484]
  multimodal audio-language models (ALMs) take interleaved audio and text as input and output text.<n>AHELM is a benchmark that aggregates various datasets -- including 2 new synthetic audio-text datasets called PARADE and CoRe-Bench.<n>We also standardize the prompts, inference parameters, and evaluation metrics to ensure equitable comparisons across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T07:40:39Z)
• MultiVox: A Benchmark for Evaluating Voice Assistants for Multimodal Interactions [70.93364531054273]
  We introduce MultiVox, the first benchmark to evaluate the ability of voice assistants to integrate spoken and visual cues.<n>Specifically, MultiVox includes 1000 human-annotated and recorded speech dialogues that encompass diverse paralinguistic features.<n>Our evaluation on 10 state-of-the-art models reveals that, although humans excel at these tasks, current models consistently struggle to produce contextually grounded responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T23:20:42Z)
• Nexus: An Omni-Perceptive And -Interactive Model for Language, Audio, And Vision [83.0622534215881]
  This work proposes an industry-level omni-modal large language model (LLM) pipeline that integrates auditory, visual, and linguistic modalities.<n>Our pipeline consists of three main components: First, a modular framework enabling flexible configuration of various encoder-LLM-decoder architectures.<n>Second, a lightweight training strategy that pre-trains audio-language alignment on the state-of-the-art vision-language model Qwen2.5-VL.<n>Third, an audio synthesis pipeline that generates high-quality audio-text data from diverse real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T17:26:36Z)
• OpenOmni: Advancing Open-Source Omnimodal Large Language Models with Progressive Multimodal Alignment and Real-Time Self-Aware Emotional Speech Synthesis [95.27191872116306]
  name is a two-stage training framework that integrates omnimodal alignment and speech generation.<n>It surpasses state-of-the-art models across omnimodal, vision-language, and speech-language benchmarks.<n>name achieves real-time speech generation with 1s latency at non-autoregressive mode.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T15:18:09Z)
• OmnixR: Evaluating Omni-modality Language Models on Reasoning across Modalities [124.05360767047539]
  We introduce OmnixR, an evaluation suite designed to benchmark SoTA Omni-modality Language Models. evaluating OLMs, which integrate multiple modalities such as text, vision, and audio, presents unique challenges. Our experiments find that all state-of-the-art OLMs struggle with OmnixR questions that require integrating information from multiple modalities to answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T04:29:46Z)
• OmniBench: Towards The Future of Universal Omni-Language Models [63.16606414452612]
  We introduce OmniBench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate models' ability to recognize, interpret, and reason across visual, acoustic, and textual inputs simultaneously.<n>Our evaluation reveals that open-source OLMs show significant limitations in instruction-following and reasoning in tri-modal contexts.<n>We advocate for developing more robust tri-modal integration techniques and training strategies to enhance OLM performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T17:59:05Z)
• A Single Self-Supervised Model for Many Speech Modalities Enables Zero-Shot Modality Transfer [31.028408352051684]
  We present u-HuBERT, a self-supervised pre-training framework that can leverage both multimodal and unimodal speech. Our single model yields 1.2%/1.4%/27.2% speech recognition word error rate on LRS3 with audio-visual/audio/visual input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-14T16:21:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.