Mitigating Object Hallucinations in LVLMs via Attention Imbalance Rectification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24058v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:06:47 GMT
• Title: Mitigating Object Hallucinations in LVLMs via Attention Imbalance Rectification
• Abstract summary: Object hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) severely compromises their reliability in real-world applications.<n>We propose Attention Imbalance Rectification (AIR), a lightweight decoding-time intervention method that reallocates attention weights and adjusts attention distributions to rectify modality-wise and token-wise imbalances.
• Score: 23.673836358196468
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Object hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) severely compromises their reliability in real-world applications, posing a critical barrier to their deployment in high-stakes scenarios such as autonomous driving and medical image analysis. Through systematic empirical investigation, we identify that the imbalanced attention allocation, both across modalities (i.e., vision and language) and within modalities (among individual tokens), exhibits a strong causal correlation with the occurrence of object hallucination. Leveraging this insight, we introduce a novel concept termed attention imbalance, which not only quantifies the degree of attention disparity but also visually delineates the underlying patterns (e.g., over-attentiveness to irrelevant language tokens or under-attentiveness to discriminative visual features) that drive object hallucination. To mitigate object hallucination, we further propose Attention Imbalance Rectification (AIR), a lightweight decoding-time intervention method that reallocates attention weights and adjusts attention distributions to rectify modality-wise and token-wise imbalances. Extensive evaluations on four mainstream LVLMs and three benchmarks (CHAIR, POPE, and MM-Vet) with seven baselines demonstrate that AIR consistently reduces object hallucination rates, achieving up to a 35.1% reduction compared to the baselines, while improving up to 15.9% of LVLMs' general capability across diverse vision-language tasks.

Related papers

• Role-Break in Attention Heads: Understanding and Detecting Hallucinations in VLMs [49.743008490747094]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) remain prone to hallucinations, producing content that is inconsistent with or unsupported by the input image.<n>Under a unified head-level view, we find that hallucination-induced changes manifest as localized deviations from each head's faithful contextual behavior.<n> Detailed analysis reveals that these deviations are systematically organized across attention heads, contextual sources, and deviation directions, and that the resulting signal is linearly readable once head identity is preserved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T13:33:51Z)
• See Only When Needed: Context-Aware Attention Intervention for Mitigating Hallucinations in LVLMs [81.71384150441163]
  We propose Context-aware Attention Intervention (CAI) for large vision-language models (LVLMs)<n>CAI enforces a see only when needed principle via two-axis selectivity: where to look and when to intervene.<n> experiments across multiple LVLM backbones and benchmarks show that CAI achieves state-of-the-art hallucination mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-29T06:35:47Z)
• Cognitive Pivot Points and Visual Anchoring: Unveiling and Rectifying Hallucinations in Multimodal Reasoning Models [65.57985131861399]
  hallucinations are strongly correlated with cognitive bifurcation points that often exhibit high entropy states.<n>We propose V-STAR, a lightweight, holistic training paradigm designed to internalize visually aware reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-11T13:59:05Z)
• Focus Matters: Phase-Aware Suppression for Hallucination in Vision-Language Models [8.304027910542446]
  We investigate the internal attention dynamics of vision encoders in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>Our analysis reveals that hallucination behavior is particularly sensitive to tokens receiving low attention during the focus phase.<n>We propose a lightweight inference-time intervention that selectively suppresses such tokens during the focus phase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-04T02:46:58Z)
• Attention at Rest Stays at Rest: Breaking Visual Inertia for Cognitive Hallucination Mitigation [50.51650162235191]
  We propose a training-free Inertia-aware Visual Excitation (IVE) method that breaks this inertial pattern by modeling cognitive inference as the dynamic responsiveness of visual attention.<n>IVE is effective across various base MLLMs and multiple hallucination benchmarks, particularly for cognitive hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T12:51:07Z)
• ACT Now: Preempting LVLM Hallucinations via Adaptive Context Integration [71.21097024566285]
  Large-Language Models (LVLMs) frequently suffer from severe hallucination issues.<n>Existing mitigation strategies rely on linguistic, single-step states to enhance visual focus or suppress strong priors.<n>We propose Adaptive Context in VisionTegration (ACT), a training-free inference intervention method that mitigates hallucination through the adaptive integration of contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T14:49:50Z)
• Segmentation-Based Attention Entropy: Detecting and Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models [9.388076929154673]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) achieve strong performance on many multimodal tasks, but object hallucinations severely undermine their reliability.<n>Most existing studies focus on the text modality, attributing hallucinations to overly strong language priors and insufficient visual grounding.<n>We propose Attention Entropy (SAE), which leverages semantic segmentation to quantify visual attention uncertainty in an object-level semantic space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T14:19:22Z)
• Look Carefully: Adaptive Visual Reinforcements in Multimodal Large Language Models for Hallucination Mitigation [51.743225614196774]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in vision-language reasoning.<n>They remain vulnerable to hallucination, where generated content deviates from visual evidence.<n>Recent vision enhancement methods attempt to address this issue by reinforcing visual tokens during decoding.<n>We propose Adaptive Visual Reinforcement (AIR), a training-free framework for MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T14:18:51Z)
• System-Mediated Attention Imbalances Make Vision-Language Models Say Yes [15.24790310403934]
  Vision-language model (VLM) hallucination is commonly linked to imbalanced allocation of attention across input modalities: system, image and text.<n>In this study, we evaluate a more holistic, system-mediated account, which attributes these imbalances to functionally redundant system weights.<n>We show that Causally redistributing attention from the system modality to image and textual inputs substantially suppresses this bias, often outperforming existing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T14:34:39Z)
• Causally-Grounded Dual-Path Attention Intervention for Object Hallucination Mitigation in LVLMs [26.144870818163387]
  We propose a framework that models hallucination process via a structural causal graph.<n>We introduce VTACR, a novel metric that quantifies the modality contribution imbalance during decoding.<n>We design a fine-language attention intervention mechanism that dynamically adjusts token- and layer-wise attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T06:13:26Z)
• On Epistemic Uncertainty of Visual Tokens for Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models [27.228426342808486]
  We argue that uncertain visual tokens within the vision encoder (VE) is a key factor that contributes to object hallucination.<n>We propose a simple yet effective strategy to mitigate object hallucination by modifying the VE only.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T05:12:52Z)
• Visual hallucination detection in large vision-language models via evidential conflict [24.465497252040294]
  Dempster-Shafer theory (DST)-based visual hallucination detection method for LVLMs through uncertainty estimation.<n>We propose to the best of our knowledge, the first Dempster-Shafer theory (DST)-based visual hallucination detection method for LVLMs through uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T11:03:10Z)
• Attention Reallocation: Towards Zero-cost and Controllable Hallucination Mitigation of MLLMs [62.9348974370985]
  We propose attention reallocation (AttnReal) to mitigate hallucinations with nearly zero extra cost.<n>Our approach is motivated by the key observations that, MLLM's unreasonable attention distribution causes features to be dominated by historical output tokens.<n>Based on the observations, AttnReal recycles excessive attention from output tokens and reallocates it to visual tokens, which reduces MLLM's reliance on language priors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T11:52:37Z)
• Cracking the Code of Hallucination in LVLMs with Vision-aware Head Divergence [69.86946427928511]
  We investigate the internal mechanisms driving hallucination in large vision-language models (LVLMs)<n>We introduce Vision-aware Head Divergence (VHD), a metric that quantifies the sensitivity of attention head outputs to visual context.<n>We propose Vision-aware Head Reinforcement (VHR), a training-free approach to mitigate hallucination by enhancing the role of vision-aware attention heads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T15:29:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.