When Understanding Becomes a Risk: Authenticity and Safety Risks in the Emerging Image Generation Paradigm
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24079v1
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:35:25 GMT
- Title: When Understanding Becomes a Risk: Authenticity and Safety Risks in the Emerging Image Generation Paradigm
- Abstract summary: multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have emerged as a unified paradigm for language and image generation.<n>We analyze and compare the safety risks of emerging MLLMs along two dimensions: unsafe content generation and fake image synthesis.
- Score: 46.5461323436883
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recently, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have emerged as a unified paradigm for language and image generation. Compared with diffusion models, MLLMs possess a much stronger capability for semantic understanding, enabling them to process more complex textual inputs and comprehend richer contextual meanings. However, this enhanced semantic ability may also introduce new and potentially greater safety risks. Taking diffusion models as a reference point, we systematically analyze and compare the safety risks of emerging MLLMs along two dimensions: unsafe content generation and fake image synthesis. Across multiple unsafe generation benchmark datasets, we observe that MLLMs tend to generate more unsafe images than diffusion models. This difference partly arises because diffusion models often fail to interpret abstract prompts, producing corrupted outputs, whereas MLLMs can comprehend these prompts and generate unsafe content. For current advanced fake image detectors, MLLM-generated images are also notably harder to identify. Even when detectors are retrained with MLLMs-specific data, they can still be bypassed by simply providing MLLMs with longer and more descriptive inputs. Our measurements indicate that the emerging safety risks of the cutting-edge generative paradigm, MLLMs, have not been sufficiently recognized, posing new challenges to real-world safety.
Related papers
- MIDAS: Multi-Image Dispersion and Semantic Reconstruction for Jailbreaking MLLMs [22.919956583415324]
Multi-Image Dispersion and Semantic Reconstruction (MIDAS)<n>We propose a multimodal jailbreak framework that decomposes harmful semantics into risk-bearing subunits.<n>MIDAS enforces longer and more structured multi-image chained reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-28T09:29:36Z) - Align is not Enough: Multimodal Universal Jailbreak Attack against Multimodal Large Language Models [83.80177564873094]
We propose a unified multimodal universal jailbreak attack framework.<n>We evaluate the undesirable context generation of MLLMs like LLaVA, Yi-VL, MiniGPT4, MiniGPT-v2, and InstructBLIP.<n>This study underscores the urgent need for robust safety measures in MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T04:33:56Z) - Do We Really Need Curated Malicious Data for Safety Alignment in Multi-modal Large Language Models? [83.53005932513155]
Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant progress, yet their safety alignment remains limited.<n>We propose finetuning MLLMs on a small set of benign instruct-following data with responses replaced by simple, clear rejection sentences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-14T09:03:51Z) - MLLM-as-a-Judge for Image Safety without Human Labeling [81.24707039432292]
In the age of AI-generated content (AIGC), many image generation models are capable of producing harmful content.<n>It is crucial to identify such unsafe images based on established safety rules.<n>Existing approaches typically fine-tune MLLMs with human-labeled datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-31T00:06:04Z) - CoCA: Regaining Safety-awareness of Multimodal Large Language Models with Constitutional Calibration [90.36429361299807]
multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success in engaging in conversations involving visual inputs.
The integration of visual modality has introduced a unique vulnerability: the MLLM becomes susceptible to malicious visual inputs.
We introduce a technique termed CoCA, which amplifies the safety-awareness of the MLLM by calibrating its output distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T17:14:41Z) - Unbridled Icarus: A Survey of the Potential Perils of Image Inputs in Multimodal Large Language Model Security [5.077261736366414]
The pursuit of reliable AI systems like powerful MLLMs has emerged as a pivotal area of contemporary research.
In this paper, we endeavor to demostrate the multifaceted risks associated with the incorporation of image modalities into MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-08T07:54:18Z) - Eyes Closed, Safety On: Protecting Multimodal LLMs via Image-to-Text Transformation [98.02846901473697]
We propose ECSO (Eyes Closed, Safety On), a training-free protecting approach that exploits the inherent safety awareness of MLLMs.
ECSO generates safer responses via adaptively transforming unsafe images into texts to activate the intrinsic safety mechanism of pre-aligned LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T17:03:04Z) - MLLM-Protector: Ensuring MLLM's Safety without Hurting Performance [36.03512474289962]
This paper investigates the novel challenge of defending MLLMs against malicious attacks through visual inputs.
Images act as a foreign language" that is not considered during safety alignment, making MLLMs more prone to producing harmful responses.
We introduce MLLM-Protector, a plug-and-play strategy that solves two subtasks: 1) identifying harmful responses via a lightweight harm detector, and 2) transforming harmful responses into harmless ones via a detoxifier.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-05T17:05:42Z) - MM-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models [41.708401515627784]
We observe that Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can be easily compromised by query-relevant images.
We introduce MM-SafetyBench, a framework designed for conducting safety-critical evaluations of MLLMs against such image-based manipulations.
Our work underscores the need for a concerted effort to strengthen and enhance the safety measures of open-source MLLMs against potential malicious exploits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-29T12:49:45Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.