TRAJEVAL: Decomposing Code Agent Trajectories for Fine-Grained Diagnosis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24631v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 05:27:03 GMT
• Title: TRAJEVAL: Decomposing Code Agent Trajectories for Fine-Grained Diagnosis
• Abstract summary: Code agents can resolve GitHub issues, yet when they fail, current evaluation provides no visibility into where or why.<n>We introduce TRAJEVAL, a diagnostic framework that decomposes agent trajectories into three interpretable stages.<n>We validate that these diagnostics are predictive, achieving model-level Pass@1 prediction within 0.87-2.1% MAE.
• Score: 23.834704102474927
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Code agents can autonomously resolve GitHub issues, yet when they fail, current evaluation provides no visibility into where or why. Metrics such as Pass@1 collapse an entire execution into a single binary outcome, making it difficult to identify where and why the agent went wrong. To address this limitation, we introduce TRAJEVAL, a diagnostic framework that decomposes agent trajectories into three interpretable stages: search (file localization), read (function comprehension), and edit (modification targeting). For each stage, we compute precision and recall by comparing against reference patches. Analyzing 16,758 trajectories across three agent architectures and seven models, we find universal inefficiencies (all agents examine approximately 22x more functions than necessary) yet distinct failure modes: GPT-5 locates relevant code but targets edits incorrectly, while Qwen-32B fails at file discovery entirely. We validate that these diagnostics are predictive, achieving model-level Pass@1 prediction within 0.87-2.1% MAE, and actionable: real-time feedback based on trajectory signals improves two state-of-the-art models by 2.2-4.6 percentage points while reducing costs by 20-31%. These results demonstrate that our framework not only provides a more fine-grained analysis of agent behavior, but also translates diagnostic signals into tangible performance gains. More broadly, TRAJEVAL transforms agent evaluation beyond outcome-based benchmarking toward mechanism-driven diagnosis of agent success and failure.

Related papers

• Leveraging Trajectory Graphs for Pre-Execution Error Diagnosis in Agentic LLM Systems [47.66236392009794]
  Large Language Model(LLM)-based agents have demonstrated exceptional performance across a wide range of complex interactive tasks.<n>We propose textitTrajectory Graph Copilot, a novel framework that acts as a copilot'' for LLM agents by diagnosing potential action errors before they are executed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T20:14:43Z)
• AgentDebugX: An Open-Source Toolkit for Failure Observability, Attribution, and Recovery in LLM Agents [83.37969790806069]
  LLM agent failures are difficult to debug because the step where an error surfaces is often not the one that caused it.<n>We present Agent DebuggerX, an open-source framework that organizes debug as a closed loop of Detect, Attribute, Recover, and Rerun.<n>At its core, Deep Debugger performs multi-turn root-cause diagnosis through global trajectory understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-21T06:21:13Z)
• Fantastic Adaptive Taxonomies and How to Use Them [100.20614173157708]
  AdaMAST converts execution traces into a compact, evidence-grounded failure taxonomy.<n>No code is hand-authored, no trace human-annotated.<n>In agent-system search, taxonomy-coded diagnoses of failed candidates outperform free-form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T17:41:16Z)
• Diagnosis-Driven Automatic Repair for Agentic Workflow via Symbolic Inference [23.048678930743467]
  FlowFixer is a diagnosis-driven automated repair framework for agenticcution.<n>We evaluate FlowFixer on workflow failures collected from three popular development platforms: Dify, Coze and n8n.<n>Results show that FlowFixer achieves a repair success rate of 71.3%, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines by 11.9% to 27.6%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-03T02:28:32Z)
• BLAgent: Agentic RAG for File-Level Bug Localization [2.2917707112773593]
  BLAgent is a novel agentic RAG framework for file-level bug localization.<n> BLAgent attains over 78% Top-1 accuracy with open-source models.<n> BLAgent improves end-to-end repair success by over 20%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T07:20:13Z)
• SAAG: Structured Agent Assessment and Grounding [13.62148061055744]
  We propose a cascaded diagnostic framework that decomposes agent-calling evaluation into three sequential stages.<n>We evaluate this framework on a benchmark derived from Glaive's function-calling dataset across registry sizes of 5, 10, and 15 agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T19:33:58Z)
• Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
  DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z)
• AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents [50.481033105867205]
  We introduce AgentProcessBench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating step-level effectiveness in realistic, tool-augmented trajectories.<n>The benchmark comprises 1,000 diverse trajectories and 8,509 human-labeled step annotations with 89.1% inter-annotator agreement.<n>It features a ternary labeling scheme to capture exploration and an error propagation rule to reduce labeling ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-15T16:13:58Z)
• Interpretable Failure Analysis in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Systems [8.723131512052703]
  Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) is increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains.<n>We introduce a two-stage gradient-based framework that provides interpretable diagnostics for three critical failure analysis tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T19:55:26Z)
• From Features to Actions: Explainability in Traditional and Agentic AI Systems [8.859406164948718]
  We bridge the gap between static and agentic explainability by comparing attribution-based explanations with trace-based diagnostics.<n>Our results show that trace-based diagnostics for agentic settings consistently localizes behaviour breakdowns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T16:34:29Z)
• DepRadar: Agentic Coordination for Context Aware Defect Impact Analysis in Deep Learning Libraries [12.07621297131295]
  DepRadar is an agent coordination framework for fine grained defect and impact analysis in DL library updates.<n>It integrates static analysis with DL-specific domain rules for defect reasoning and client side tracing.<n>On 122 client programs, DepRadar identifies affected cases with 90% recall and 80% precision, substantially outperforming other baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T12:41:39Z)
• DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems [48.971606069204825]
  DoVer is an intervention-driven debug framework for large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems.<n>It augments hypothesis generation with active verification through targeted interventions.<n>DoVer flips 18-28% of failed trials into successes, achieves up to 16% milestone progress, and validates or refutes 30-60% of failure hypotheses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T09:23:48Z)
• Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation [87.47155146067962]
  We provide a standardized evaluation harness that orchestrates parallel evaluations across hundreds of tasks.<n>We conduct three-dimensional analysis spanning models, scaffolds, and benchmarks.<n>Our analysis reveals surprising insights, such as higher reasoning effort reducing accuracy in the majority of runs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T22:22:28Z)
• Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures [62.196870049524364]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise in solving complex, multi-step tasks.<n>They amplify vulnerability to cascading failures, where a single root-cause error propagates through subsequent decisions.<n>Current systems lack a framework that can comprehensively understand agent error in a modular and systemic way.<n>We introduce the AgentErrorTaxonomy, a modular classification of failure modes spanning memory, reflection, planning, action, and system-level operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T18:20:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.