Are LLM-Enhanced Graph Neural Networks Robust against Poisoning Attacks?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26105v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 06:28:25 GMT
• Title: Are LLM-Enhanced Graph Neural Networks Robust against Poisoning Attacks?
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) by enriching node representations with semantic features.<n>We propose a robustness assessment framework that systematically evaluates LLM-enhanced GNNs under poisoning attacks.
• Score: 9.709556420480508
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) by enriching node representations with semantic features, giving rise to LLM-enhanced GNNs that achieve notable performance gains. However, the robustness of these models against poisoning attacks, which manipulate both graph structures and textual attributes during training, remains unexplored. To bridge this gap, we propose a robustness assessment framework that systematically evaluates LLM-enhanced GNNs under poisoning attacks. Our framework enables comprehensive evaluation across multiple dimensions. Specifically, we assess 24 victim models by combining eight LLM- or Language Model (LM)-based feature enhancers with three representative GNN backbones. To ensure diversity in attack coverage, we incorporate six structural poisoning attacks (both targeted and non-targeted) and three textual poisoning attacks operating at the character, word, and sentence levels. Furthermore, we employ four real-world datasets, including one released after the emergence of LLMs, to avoid potential ground truth leakage during LLM pretraining, thereby ensuring fair evaluation. Extensive experiments show that LLM-enhanced GNNs exhibit significantly higher accuracy and lower Relative Drop in Accuracy (RDA) than a shallow embedding-based baseline across various attack settings. Our in-depth analysis identifies key factors that contribute to this robustness, such as the effective encoding of structural and label information in node representations. Based on these insights, we outline future research directions from both offensive and defensive perspectives, and propose a new combined attack along with a graph purification defense. To support future research, we release the source code of our framework at~\url{https://github.com/CyberAlSec/LLMEGNNRP}.

Related papers

• Defending Network Intrusion Detection Systems Based on Graph Neural Networks Against Structural Adversarial Attacks [3.444915014411325]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) represent a promising solution for Machine Learning (ML) based Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS)<n>GNNs remain vulnerable to structural adversarial attacks, where an attacker perturbs the underlying network graph topology by injecting edges or inserting nodes.<n>We propose a defense framework based on adversarial training to strengthen GNN-based NIDS against structural attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T12:06:12Z)
• Beyond Homophily: Towards Generalized Graph Reconstruction Attack and Defense [80.28330585803133]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely deployed on computation data, yet they can leak sensitive or proprietary information about the training graph adjacency.<n>This work studies graph reconstruction attacks (GRA), a form of model inversion that reconstructs the training adjacency from a trained GNN.<n>We propose MC-GRA (+), which reconstructs the adjacency by optimizing a surrogate adjacency whose GNN-induced representations align with those of the target model.<n>On the defense side, we propose MC-GPB (+), which suppresses adjacency-dependent information throughout the representation chain
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-06T09:29:27Z)
• GRAPHTEXTACK: A Realistic Black-Box Node Injection Attack on LLM-Enhanced GNNs [17.77340454481932]
  Recent work integrates Large Language Models with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to jointly model semantics and structure.<n>This integration introduces dual vulnerabilities: GNNs are sensitive to structural perturbations, while LLM-derived features are vulnerable to prompt injection and adversarial perturbations.<n>To address these gaps, we propose GRAPH TEXTACK, the first black-box, multi-modal, poisoning node injection attack for LLM-enhanced GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-16T02:42:48Z)
• Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on Graph-aware Large Language Models (LLMs) [8.885929731174492]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated with graph-structured data for tasks like node classification.<n>We take the first step to explore the vulnerabilities of graph-aware LLMs by leveraging existing adversarial attack methods tailored for graph-based models.<n>We propose an end-to-end defense framework GALGUARD, that combines an LLM-based feature correction module to mitigate feature-level perturbations and adapted GNN defenses to protect against structural attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T21:38:52Z)
• TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks [3.3238054848751535]
  We introduce TrustGLM, a comprehensive study evaluating the vulnerability of GraphLLMs to adversarial attacks across three dimensions: text, graph structure, and prompt manipulations.<n>Our findings reveal that GraphLLMs are highly susceptible to text attacks that merely replace a few semantically similar words in a node's textual attribute.<n>We also find that standard graph structure attack methods can significantly degrade model performance, while random shuffling of the candidate label set in prompt templates leads to substantial performance drops.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T14:48:01Z)
• Grimm: A Plug-and-Play Perturbation Rectifier for Graph Neural Networks Defending against Poisoning Attacks [53.972077392749185]
  Recent studies have revealed the vulnerability of graph neural networks (GNNs) to adversarial poisoning attacks on node classification tasks.<n>Here we introduce Grimm, the first plug-and-play defense model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T17:17:02Z)
• Can Large Language Models Improve the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Neural Networks? [45.55125612241908]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, especially for topology perturbations.<n>We propose an LLM-based robust graph structure inference framework, LLM4RGNN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T11:58:34Z)
• Provable Robustness of (Graph) Neural Networks Against Data Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks [50.87615167799367]
  We certify Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) against poisoning attacks, including backdoors, targeting the node features of a given graph.<n>Our framework provides fundamental insights into the role of graph structure and its connectivity on the worst-case behavior of convolution-based and PageRank-based GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T16:12:51Z)
• Graph Transductive Defense: a Two-Stage Defense for Graph Membership Inference Attacks [50.19590901147213]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become instrumental in diverse real-world applications, offering powerful graph learning capabilities. GNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, including membership inference attacks (MIA) This paper proposes an effective two-stage defense, Graph Transductive Defense (GTD), tailored to graph transductive learning characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T06:36:37Z)
• Securing Graph Neural Networks in MLaaS: A Comprehensive Realization of Query-based Integrity Verification [68.86863899919358]
  We introduce a groundbreaking approach to protect GNN models in Machine Learning from model-centric attacks. Our approach includes a comprehensive verification schema for GNN's integrity, taking into account both transductive and inductive GNNs. We propose a query-based verification technique, fortified with innovative node fingerprint generation algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T03:17:05Z)
• Information Obfuscation of Graph Neural Networks [96.8421624921384]
  We study the problem of protecting sensitive attributes by information obfuscation when learning with graph structured data. We propose a framework to locally filter out pre-determined sensitive attributes via adversarial training with the total variation and the Wasserstein distance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T17:55:04Z)
• Graph Backdoor [53.70971502299977]
  We present GTA, the first backdoor attack on graph neural networks (GNNs) GTA departs in significant ways: it defines triggers as specific subgraphs, including both topological structures and descriptive features. It can be instantiated for both transductive (e.g., node classification) and inductive (e.g., graph classification) tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T19:45:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.