Sparse Auto-Encoders and Holism about Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26207v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:29:13 GMT
• Title: Sparse Auto-Encoders and Holism about Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: I will present the original reasons for thinking that Large Language Models embody a form of holism.<n>I will then respond to this challenge by considering in greater detail the nature of such features.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Does Large Language Model (LLM) technology suggest a meta-semantic picture i.e. a picture of how words and complex expressions come to have the meaning that they do? One modest approach explores the assumptions that seem to be built into how LLMs capture the meanings of linguistic expressions as a way of considering their plausibility (Grindrod, 2026a, 2026b). It has previously been argued that LLMs, in employing a form of distributional semantics, adopt a form of holism about meaning (Grindrod, 2023; Grindrod et al., forthcoming). However, recent work in mechanistic interpretability presents a challenge to these arguments. Specifically, the discovery of a vast array of interpretable latent features within the high dimensional spaces used by LLMs potentially challenges the holistic interpretation. In this paper, I will present the original reasons for thinking that LLMs embody a form of holism (section 1), before introducing recent work on features generated through sparse auto-encoders, and explaining how the discovery of such features suggests an alternative decompositional picture of meaning (section 2). I will then respond to this challenge by considering in greater detail the nature of such features (section 3). Finally, I will return to the holistic picture defended by Grindrod et al. and argue that the picture still stands provided that the features are countable (section 4).

Related papers

• Farther the Shift, Sparser the Representation: Analyzing OOD Mechanisms in LLMs [100.02824137397464]
  We investigate how Large Language Models adapt their internal representations when encountering inputs of increasing difficulty.<n>We reveal a consistent and quantifiable phenomenon: as task difficulty increases, the last hidden states of LLMs become substantially sparser.<n>This sparsity--difficulty relation is observable across diverse models and domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T18:48:15Z)
• SaFiRe: Saccade-Fixation Reiteration with Mamba for Referring Image Segmentation [58.80001825332851]
  Referring Image (RIS) aims to segment the target object in an image given a natural language expression.<n>Recent methods predominantly focus on simple expressions like "red car" or "left girl"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T10:50:58Z)
• Frame Representation Hypothesis: Multi-Token LLM Interpretability and Concept-Guided Text Generation [6.356639602091336]
  Interpretability is a key challenge in fostering trust for Large Language Models.<n>We present the Frame Representation Hypothesis to interpret and control LLMs by modeling multi-token words.<n>We showcase these tools through Top-k Concept-Guided Decoding, which can intuitively steer text generation using concepts of choice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T09:25:39Z)
• Language Models as Semiotic Machines: Reconceptualizing AI Language Systems through Structuralist and Post-Structuralist Theories of Language [0.0]
  This paper proposes a novel framework for understanding large language models (LLMs) I argue that LLMs should be understood as models of language itself, aligning with Jacques's concept of 'writing' (l'ecriture) I apply Saussure's critique of Saussure to position 'writing' as the object modeled by LLMs, offering a view of the machine's'mind' as a statistical approximation of sign behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T21:45:54Z)
• Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explained [2.443957114877221]
  Language Models (LMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks.<n>Despite these advancements, LMs can inherit and amplify societal biases related to sensitive attributes such as gender and race.<n>This paper proposes a systematic survey that clarifies the definitions of fairness as they apply to LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T01:21:25Z)
• Can large language models understand uncommon meanings of common words? [30.527834781076546]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant advancements across diverse natural language understanding (NLU) tasks. Yet, lacking widely acknowledged testing mechanisms, answering whether LLMs are parrots or genuinely comprehend the world' remains unclear. This paper presents innovative construction of a Lexical Semantic dataset with novel evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T12:58:22Z)
• Analyzing the Role of Semantic Representations in the Era of Large Language Models [104.18157036880287]
  We investigate the role of semantic representations in the era of large language models (LLMs) We propose an AMR-driven chain-of-thought prompting method, which we call AMRCoT. We find that it is difficult to predict which input examples AMR may help or hurt on, but errors tend to arise with multi-word expressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:32:59Z)
• Fantastic Semantics and Where to Find Them: Investigating Which Layers of Generative LLMs Reflect Lexical Semantics [50.982315553104975]
  We investigate the bottom-up evolution of lexical semantics for a popular large language model, namely Llama2. Our experiments show that the representations in lower layers encode lexical semantics, while the higher layers, with weaker semantic induction, are responsible for prediction. This is in contrast to models with discriminative objectives, such as mask language modeling, where the higher layers obtain better lexical semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T13:14:47Z)
• Are Representations Built from the Ground Up? An Empirical Examination of Local Composition in Language Models [91.3755431537592]
  Representing compositional and non-compositional phrases is critical for language understanding. We first formulate a problem of predicting the LM-internal representations of longer phrases given those of their constituents. While we would expect the predictive accuracy to correlate with human judgments of semantic compositionality, we find this is largely not the case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T14:21:30Z)
• Latent Topology Induction for Understanding Contextualized Representations [84.7918739062235]
  We study the representation space of contextualized embeddings and gain insight into the hidden topology of large language models. We show there exists a network of latent states that summarize linguistic properties of contextualized representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-03T11:22:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.