Channelling, Coordinating, Collaborating: A Three-Layer Framework for Disability-Centered Human-Agent Collaboration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26252v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 10:19:30 GMT
• Title: Channelling, Coordinating, Collaborating: A Three-Layer Framework for Disability-Centered Human-Agent Collaboration
• Abstract summary: For many people with disabilities, complex tasks are accomplished through collaboration with others who bring complementary abilities, not solitary effort.<n>We propose a three-layer framework, Channelling, Coordinating, and Co-Creating, that rethinks AI's role in ability-diverse collaboration.
• Score: 9.587600448186839
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI accessibility tools have mostly been designed for individual use, helping one person overcome a specific functional barrier. But for many people with disabilities, complex tasks are accomplished through collaboration with others who bring complementary abilities, not solitary effort. We propose a three-layer framework, Channelling, Coordinating, and Co-Creating, that rethinks AI's role in ability-diverse collaboration: establishing shared informational ground across abilities, mediating workflows between collaborators with different abilities, and contributing as a bounded partner toward shared goals. Grounded in the Ability-Diverse Collaboration framework, grounding theory, and Carlile's 3T framework, it extends the ``agents as remote collaborators'' vision by centring the collaborative, interdependent ways people with disabilities already work.

Related papers

• CoMind: Understanding Collaborative Human Activity from Multiple Minds and Views [82.15362247351763]
  We introduce a novel egocentric and exocentric video dataset capturing real-world collaboration in cooking scenarios.<n>The dataset integrates multi-perspective video, high-quality audio, gaze tracking, and 3D scene and object scans, with annotations for shared attention to objects.<n>We establish benchmarks for Joint Attention Estimation, Socially Conditioned Object Interaction Anticipation, and Collaborative Handover Prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T18:08:45Z)
• Humans' ALMANAC: A Human Collaboration Dataset of Action-Level Mental Model Annotations for Agent Collaboration [54.18136393879849]
  We present ALMANAC, a dataset of action-level mental model ANnotations for Agent Collaboration.<n>ALMANAC contains 2,987 collaboration actions, each paired with theory-informed mental model annotations.<n>Our results demonstrate ALMANAC's utility in evaluating models' ability to simulate human collaborative behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T16:56:12Z)
• The Collaboration Gap in Human-AI Work [11.663456969895462]
  This poster introduces a conceptual framework for understanding why such collaboration remains fragile.<n>We argue that stable collaboration depends not only on model capability but on the interaction's grounding conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T11:14:40Z)
• CollabSkill: Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration On Real-World Tasks [55.84031315625504]
  CollabSkill is a framework for evaluating human-agent collaboration on real-world occupational tasks.<n>It pairs real human workers with AI agents on tasks matched to their occupational background.<n>Our analysis reveals that practical experience emerges as the primary driver of collaboration skill.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T03:03:25Z)
• TeamHOI: Learning a Unified Policy for Cooperative Human-Object Interactions with Any Team Size [54.0714652192002]
  Physics-based humanoid control has achieved remarkable progress in enabling realistic and high-performing single-agent behaviors.<n>We present TeamHOI, a framework that enables a single decentralized policy to handle cooperative HOIs across any number of cooperating agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T05:52:13Z)
• CooperBench: Why Coding Agents Cannot be Your Teammates Yet [44.06715229961526]
  CooperBench is a benchmark of over 600 collaborative coding tasks across 12 libraries in 4 programming languages.<n>Agents achieve on average 30% lower success rates when working together compared to performing both tasks individually.<n>Our analysis reveals three key issues: (1) communication channels become jammed with vague, ill-timed, and inaccurate messages; (2) even with effective communication, agents deviate from their commitments; and (3) agents often hold incorrect expectations about others' plans and communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T18:48:37Z)
• The Collaboration Gap [28.553543260404425]
  We propose a collaborative maze-solving benchmark that (i) isolates collaborative capabilities, (ii) modulates problem complexity, (iii) enables scalable automated grading, and (iv) imposes no output constraintsformat.<n>Using this framework, we evaluate 32 leading open- and closed-source models in solo, homogeneous, and heterogeneous pairings.<n>Our results reveal a "collaboration gap": models that perform well solo often degrade substantially when required to collaborate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T16:10:57Z)
• Learning "Partner-Aware" Collaborators in Multi-Party Collaboration [12.287537011305497]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly bring deployed in agentic settings where they act as collaborators with humans.<n>This paper builds on the AI alignment and safe interruptability literature to offer novel theoretical insights on collaborative behavior.<n>We propose Interruptible Collaborative Roleplayer (ICR)-a novel partner-aware learning algorithm to train CG-optimal collaborators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T00:05:48Z)
• Cross-environment Cooperation Enables Zero-shot Multi-agent Coordination [37.90912492084769]
  We study how reinforcement learning on a distribution of environments with a single partner enables learning general cooperative skills.<n>We introduce two Jax-based, procedural generators that create billions of solvable coordination challenges.<n>Our findings suggest that learning to collaborate across many unique scenarios encourages agents to develop general norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T07:41:25Z)
• Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration [50.657070334404835]
  Collaborative Gym is a framework enabling asynchronous, tripartite interaction among agents, humans, and task environments.<n>We instantiate Co-Gym with three representative tasks in both simulated and real-world conditions.<n>Our findings reveal that collaborative agents consistently outperform their fully autonomous counterparts in task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T09:21:15Z)
• On the Critical Role of Conventions in Adaptive Human-AI Collaboration [73.21967490610142]
  We propose a learning framework that teases apart rule-dependent representation from convention-dependent representation. We experimentally validate our approach on three collaborative tasks varying in complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T02:46:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.