LITTA: Late-Interaction and Test-Time Alignment for Visually-Grounded Multimodal Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26683v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 13:25:39 GMT
• Title: LITTA: Late-Interaction and Test-Time Alignment for Visually-Grounded Multimodal Retrieval
• Abstract summary: LITTA is a query-expansion-centric retrieval framework for evidence page retrieval.<n>Given a user query, LITTA generates complementary query variants using a large language model.<n>Candidates from expanded queries are aggregated through reciprocal rank fusion to improve evidence coverage.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieving relevant evidence from visually rich documents such as textbooks, technical reports, and manuals is challenging due to long context, complex layouts, and weak lexical overlap between user questions and supporting pages. We propose LITTA, a query-expansion-centric retrieval framework for evidence page retrieval that improves multimodal document retrieval without retriever retraining. Given a user query, LITTA generates complementary query variants using a large language model and retrieves candidate pages for each variant using a frozen vision retriever with late-interaction scoring. Candidates from expanded queries are then aggregated through reciprocal rank fusion to improve evidence coverage and reduce sensitivity to any single phrasing. This simple test-time strategy significantly improves retrieval robustness while remaining compatible with existing multimodal embedding indices. We evaluate LITTA on visually grounded document retrieval tasks across three domains: computer science, pharmaceuticals, and industrial manuals. Multi-query retrieval consistently improves top-k accuracy, recall, and MRR compared to single-query retrieval, with particularly large gains in domains with high visual and semantic variability. Moreover, the accuracy-efficiency trade-off is directly controllable by the number of query variants, making LITTA practical for deployment under latency constraints. These results demonstrate that query expansion provides a simple yet effective mechanism for improving visually grounded multimodal retrieval.

Related papers

• When Should Queries Be Decomposed? A Stage-Aware Study of Query Decomposition for Multi-Condition Retrieval [7.14438992840294]
  Multi-condition retrieval requires systems to identify documents that satisfy multiple distinct constraints.<n> query decomposition is widely adopted as an intuitive remedy, but its effectiveness across different retrieval pipeline stages remains underexplored.<n>We propose a principled Stage-Aware Decomposition framework that retains the monolithic query during initial retrieval to preserve global semantic context, while employing sub-queries exclusively during reranking for fine-grained constraint matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-07T11:13:15Z)
• MARA: A Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Document Question Answering [51.19392014547221]
  Retrieval-based multimodal document QA aims to identify and integrate relevant information from visually rich documents with complex multimodal structures.<n>Current approaches rely on query-agnostic document representations that overlook salient content.<n>We propose the Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented (MARA) framework, which introduces query-adaptive generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T12:27:40Z)
• Resolving Evidence Sparsity: Agentic Context Engineering for Long-Document Understanding [49.26132236798123]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) have gradually become a primary approach in document understanding.<n>We propose SLEUTH, a multi agent framework that orchestrates a retriever and four collaborative agents in a coarse to fine process.<n>The framework identifies key textual and visual clues within the retrieved pages, filters for salient visual evidence such as tables and charts, and analyzes the query to devise a reasoning strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T03:09:40Z)
• Generalized Contrastive Learning for Universal Multimodal Retrieval [53.70202081784898]
  Cross-modal retrieval models (e.g., CLIP) show degraded performances with retrieving keys composed of fused image-text modality.<n>This paper proposes Generalized Contrastive Learning (GCL), a novel loss formulation that improves multimodal retrieval performance without the need for new dataset curation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T01:25:04Z)
• Reasoning-enhanced Query Understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation [87.56450566014625]
  ReDI is a Reasoning-enhanced approach for query understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation.<n>We compiled a large-scale dataset of real-world complex queries from a major search engine.<n> Experiments on BRIGHT and BEIR demonstrate that ReDI consistently surpasses strong baselines in both sparse and dense retrieval paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T10:58:42Z)
• Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Generation for Document Question Answering [60.062194349648195]
  Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) faces dual challenges in processing lengthy multimodal documents.<n>Current document retrieval-augmented generation (DocRAG) methods remain limited by their text-centric approaches.<n>We introduce MMDocRAG, a comprehensive benchmark featuring 4,055 expert-annotated QA pairs with multi-page, cross-modal evidence chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:52:57Z)
• MultiConIR: Towards multi-condition Information Retrieval [38.864056667809095]
  MultiConIR is a benchmark designed to evaluate retrieval and reranking models under nuanced multi-condition query scenarios.<n>Most retrievers and rerankers exhibit severe performance degradation as query complexity increases.<n>This work delves into the factors contributing to reranker performance deterioration and examines how condition positioning within queries affects similarity assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T05:02:03Z)
• MM-Embed: Universal Multimodal Retrieval with Multimodal LLMs [78.5013630951288]
  This paper introduces techniques for advancing information retrieval with multimodal large language models (MLLMs)<n>We first study fine-tuning an MLLM as a bi-encoder retriever on 10 datasets with 16 retrieval tasks.<n>Our model, MM-Embed, achieves state-of-the-art performance on the multimodal retrieval benchmark M-BEIR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T20:06:34Z)
• Multi-Head RAG: Solving Multi-Aspect Problems with LLMs [18.48202014877111]
  Multi-Head RAG (MRAG) is a novel scheme for fetching multi-aspect documents.<n>We show MRAG's design advantages over 18 RAG baselines, empirical improvements of up to 20% in retrieval success ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T16:59:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.