Gradient Manipulation in Distributed Stochastic Gradient Descent with Strategic Agents: Truthful Incentives with Convergence Guarantees

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27962v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 02:27:00 GMT
• Title: Gradient Manipulation in Distributed Stochastic Gradient Descent with Strategic Agents: Truthful Incentives with Convergence Guarantees
• Abstract summary: A key vulnerability of existing distributed learning approaches is their implicit assumption that all agents behave honestly during gradient updates.<n>We propose a fully distributed payment mechanism that guarantees both truthful behaviors and accurate convergence in distributed gradient descent.
• Score: 3.7377404546651753
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Distributed learning has gained significant attention due to its advantages in scalability, privacy, and fault tolerance.In this paradigm, multiple agents collaboratively train a global model by exchanging parameters only with their neighbors. However, a key vulnerability of existing distributed learning approaches is their implicit assumption that all agents behave honestly during gradient updates. In real-world scenarios, this assumption often breaks down, as selfish or strategic agents may be incentivized to manipulate gradients for personal gain, ultimately compromising the final learning outcome. In this work, we propose a fully distributed payment mechanism that, for the first time, guarantees both truthful behaviors and accurate convergence in distributed stochastic gradient descent. This represents a significant advancement, as it overcomes two major limitations of existing truthfulness mechanisms for collaborative learning:(1) reliance on a centralized server for payment collection, and (2) sacrificing convergence accuracy to guarantee truthfulness. In addition to characterizing the convergence rate under general convex and strongly convex conditions, we also prove that our approach guarantees the cumulative gain that an agent can obtain through strategic behavior remains finite, even as the number of iterations approaches infinity--a property unattainable by most existing truthfulness mechanisms. Our experimental results on standard machine learning tasks, evaluated on benchmark datasets, confirm the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Related papers

• Low Variance Trust Region Optimization with Independent Actors and Sequential Updates in Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [5.8010446129208155]
  We introduce a clipping objective to control the upper bounds of the advantage fluctuation in sequential updates.<n>We derive two new practical algorithms using our clipping objective.<n>Our proposed method is highlighted with both stable convergence properties and the desired low advantage variance estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-24T08:05:11Z)
• Multimodal Learning on Low-Quality Data with Conformal Predictive Self-Calibration [72.0672328514289]
  Multimodal learning often grapples with the challenge of low-quality data.<n>We propose a unified framework, termed Conformal Predictive Self-Calibration.<n>Our framework consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T14:48:52Z)
• World Action Verifier: Self-Improving World Models via Forward-Inverse Asymmetry [82.93104394404781]
  General-purpose world models promise scalable policy evaluation, optimization, and planning.<n>We propose World Action Verifier (WAV), a framework that enables world models to identify their own prediction errors and self-improve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T12:48:36Z)
• Byzantine-Robust and Differentially Private Federated Optimization under Weaker Assumptions [89.52532304099522]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables clients to collaboratively train a shared model without centralizing their raw data, offering an inherent level of privacy.<n> gradients and model updates can still leak sensitive information, while malicious servers may mount adversarial attacks such as Byzantine manipulation.<n>These vulnerabilities highlight the need to address differential privacy (DP) and Byzantine robustness within a unified framework.<n>We propose Byz-Clip21-SGD2M, a new algorithm that integrates robust aggregation with double momentum and carefully designed clipping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T17:39:09Z)
• The Silent Scholar Problem: A Probabilistic Framework for Breaking Epistemic Asymmetry in LLM Agents [0.6117371161379209]
  We propose a formal probabilistic framework that provides agents with a non-altruistic motive for bidirectional knowledge exchange.<n>We show how these accumulated belief states serve as verifiable reward signals for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and high-quality data filters for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)<n> Simulation results validate that this uncertainty-driven strategy significantly outperforms random baselines in heterogeneous environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T02:02:25Z)
• Stochastically Dominant Peer Prediction [11.183872292320824]
  We propose dominantally dominant (SD-truthfulness) as a stronger guarantee of truthful reporting.<n>A simple solution -- rounding into binary lotteries -- can enforce SD-truthfulness, but often degrades sensitivity.<n>We demonstrate how a more careful application of rounding can better preserve sensitivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T21:07:24Z)
• Intersectional Divergence: Measuring Fairness in Regression [21.34290540936501]
  We propose a novel approach to measure intersectional fairness in regression tasks.<n>We argue that it is insufficient to measure the average error of groups without regard for imbalanced domain preferences.<n>We show how ID can be adapted into a loss function, IDLoss, that satisfies convergence guarantees and has piecewise smooth properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T19:43:12Z)
• Collaborative Value Function Estimation Under Model Mismatch: A Federated Temporal Difference Analysis [55.13545823385091]
  Federated reinforcement learning (FedRL) enables collaborative learning while preserving data privacy by preventing direct data exchange between agents.<n>In real-world applications, each agent may experience slightly different transition dynamics, leading to inherent model mismatches.<n>We show that even moderate levels of information sharing significantly mitigate environment-specific errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T18:06:28Z)
• Lie Detector: Unified Backdoor Detection via Cross-Examination Framework [68.45399098884364]
  We propose a unified backdoor detection framework in the semi-honest setting.<n>Our method achieves superior detection performance, improving accuracy by 5.4%, 1.6%, and 11.9% over SoTA baselines.<n> Notably, it is the first to effectively detect backdoors in multimodal large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T06:12:06Z)
• Improving self-training under distribution shifts via anchored confidence with theoretical guarantees [13.796664304274643]
  Self-training often falls short under distribution shifts due to an increased discrepancy between prediction confidence and actual accuracy. We develop a principled method to improve self-training under distribution shifts based on temporal consistency. Our approach consistently improves self-training performances by 8% to 16% across diverse distribution shift scenarios without a computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T13:48:11Z)
• VALID: a Validated Algorithm for Learning in Decentralized Networks with Possible Adversarial Presence [13.612214163974459]
  We introduce the paradigm of validated decentralized learning for undirected networks with heterogeneous data. VALID protocol is the first to achieve a validated learning guarantee. Remarkably, VALID retains optimal performance metrics in adversary-free environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T15:55:43Z)
• Practical Approaches for Fair Learning with Multitype and Multivariate Sensitive Attributes [70.6326967720747]
  It is important to guarantee that machine learning algorithms deployed in the real world do not result in unfairness or unintended social consequences. We introduce FairCOCCO, a fairness measure built on cross-covariance operators on reproducing kernel Hilbert Spaces. We empirically demonstrate consistent improvements against state-of-the-art techniques in balancing predictive power and fairness on real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T11:28:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.