Teaching AI Interactively: A Case Study in Higher Education
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28679v1
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:58:19 GMT
- Title: Teaching AI Interactively: A Case Study in Higher Education
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a quasi-experimental case study examining the redesign of in-class instructional time in a university-level Introduction to Artificial Intelligence course.<n>Inspired by CS Unplugged approaches, we redesigned the summer offering, integrating embodied, unplugged simulations, collaborative programming labs, and structured reflection.<n>Students in the redesigned course reported higher attendance, stronger agreement that assessments measured their understanding, and greater overall course effectiveness.
- Score: 0.19383897563685792
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Introductory artificial intelligence (AI) courses present significant learning challenges due to abstract concepts, mathematical complexity, and students' diverse technical backgrounds. While active and collaborative pedagogies are often recommended, implementation can be difficult at scale due to large class sizes and the intensive design effort required of instructors. This paper presents a quasi-experimental case study examining the redesign of in-class instructional time in a university-level Introduction to Artificial Intelligence course. Inspired by CS Unplugged approaches, we redesigned the summer offering, integrating embodied, unplugged simulations, collaborative programming labs, and structured reflection to provide students with a first-person perspective on AI decision-making. We maintained identical assignments, exams, and assessments as the traditional lecture-based offering. Using course evaluation data, final grade distributions, and post-course interviews, we examined differences in student engagement, experiences, and traditional learning outcomes. Quantitative results show that students in the redesigned course reported higher attendance, stronger agreement that assessments measured their understanding, and greater overall course effectiveness, despite no significant differences in final grades or self-reported learning. Qualitative findings indicate that unplugged simulations and collaboration fostered a safe, supportive learning environment that increased engagement and confidence with AI concepts. These results highlight the importance of in-class instructional design in improving students' learning experiences without compromising rigor.
Related papers
- UCO: A Multi-Turn Interactive Reinforcement Learning Method for Adaptive Teaching with Large Language Models [59.693733170193944]
Large language models (LLMs) are shifting from answer providers to intelligent tutors in educational settings.<n>Recent reinforcement learning approaches address this limitation but face two critical challenges.<n>We propose the Unidirectional Cognitive Optimization (UCO) method to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-12T01:27:02Z) - The Imperfect Learner: Incorporating Developmental Trajectories in Memory-based Student Simulation [55.722188569369656]
This paper introduces a novel framework for memory-based student simulation.<n>It incorporates developmental trajectories through a hierarchical memory mechanism with structured knowledge representation.<n>In practice, we implement a curriculum-aligned simulator grounded on the Next Generation Science Standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-08T08:05:43Z) - Bridging the Gap Between Theoretical and Practical Reinforcement Learning in Undergraduate Education [0.0]
The proposed approach integrates traditional lectures with interactive lab-based learning.<n>The framework engages students through real-time coding exercises using simulated environments such as OpenAI Gymnasium.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-06T11:37:12Z) - Do Students Learn Better Together? Teaching Design Patterns and the OSI Model with the Aronson Method [0.4369550829556577]
This study explores the use of the Aronson Jigsaw method to enhance learning and engagement in two foundational computing topics.<n>The intervention was applied to two 2025 cohorts, with student progress measured using a Collaborative Learning Index.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-22T20:07:15Z) - AI-Educational Development Loop (AI-EDL): A Conceptual Framework to Bridge AI Capabilities with Classical Educational Theories [8.500617875591633]
This study introduces the AI-Educational Development Loop (AI-EDL), a theory-driven framework that integrates classical learning theories with human-in-the-loop artificial intelligence (AI)<n>The framework emphasizes transparency, self-regulated learning, and pedagogical oversight.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-01T15:44:19Z) - Exploring Engagement and Perceived Learning Outcomes in an Immersive Flipped Learning Context [0.195804735329484]
The aim of this study was to explore the benefits and challenges of the immersive flipped learning approach in relation to students' online engagement and perceived learning outcomes.
The study revealed high levels of student engagement and perceived learning outcomes, although it also identified areas needing improvement.
The findings of this study can serve as a valuable resource for educators seeking to design engaging and effective remote learning experiences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T11:38:48Z) - Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes.
We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function.
Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z) - Implementing Learning Principles with a Personal AI Tutor: A Case Study [2.94944680995069]
This research demonstrates the ability of personal AI tutors to model human learning processes and effectively enhance academic performance.
By integrating AI tutors into their programs, educators can offer students personalized learning experiences grounded in the principles of learning sciences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-10T15:35:47Z) - Quiz-based Knowledge Tracing [61.9152637457605]
Knowledge tracing aims to assess individuals' evolving knowledge states according to their learning interactions.
QKT achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-05T12:48:42Z) - Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal.
In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z) - A Competence-aware Curriculum for Visual Concepts Learning via Question
Answering [95.35905804211698]
We propose a competence-aware curriculum for visual concept learning in a question-answering manner.
We design a neural-symbolic concept learner for learning the visual concepts and a multi-dimensional Item Response Theory (mIRT) model for guiding the learning process.
Experimental results on CLEVR show that with a competence-aware curriculum, the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-03T05:08:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.