Practical Feasibility of Sustainable Software Engineering Tools and Techniques

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29056v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 22:47:26 GMT
• Title: Practical Feasibility of Sustainable Software Engineering Tools and Techniques
• Abstract summary: This study investigates how software practitioners perceive the feasibility of existing Sustainable Software Engineering tools and techniques.<n>We identified prominent categories of SSE tools targeting energy consumption, green, and workload management, and evaluated them along three practitioner-relevant dimensions.<n>Our findings suggest that the practitioners strongly favored tools that integrate into existing pipelines, require minimal and locally scoped data access, and provide interpretable, actionable outputs.
• Score: 0.5097809301149341
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While Sustainable Software Engineering (SSE) tools are widely studied in academia, their practical feasibility in industrial workflows, particularly in regulated environments, remains poorly understood. This study investigates how software practitioners perceive the feasibility of existing SSE tools and techniques, and examines the technical, organizational, and cultural factors shaping their adoption in practice. We identified prominent categories of SSE tools targeting energy consumption, green refactoring, and workload management, and evaluated them along three practitioner-relevant dimensions: installation, input requirements, and output formats. These were presented through an interactive web application and explored in workshops with 16 practitioners from a regulated financial-sector organization, followed by a survey of 27 software practitioners. Our findings suggest that the practitioners strongly favored tools that integrate into existing IDEs or pipelines, require minimal and locally scoped data access, and provide interpretable, actionable outputs such as dashboards or automated refactoring suggestions. In regulated settings, compliance requirements, approval processes, and time constraints significantly shaped feasibility perceptions. Our contribution lies in providing empirical evidence of these preferences alongside other factors that affect regulated industrial contexts. The findings offer actionable guidance for designing SSE tools that better align with real-world development workflows and organizational constraints.

Related papers

• The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration [58.062622978943885]
  Tool use enables large language models to access external information, invoke software systems, and act in digital environments beyond what can be solved from model parameters alone.<n>As agent systems evolve, the central problem has shifted from isolated invocation to multi-tool orchestration over long trajectories with intermediate state, execution feedback, changing environments, and practical constraints such as safety, cost, and verifiability.<n>We organize the literature around six core dimensions: inference-time planning and execution, training and trajectory construction, safety and control, efficiency under resource constraints, capability completeness in open environments, and benchmark design and evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T07:05:05Z)
• Understanding the Role of Large Language Models in Software Engineering: Evidence from an Industry Survey [0.6660458629649825]
  This paper reports an empirical study of Large Language Models (LLMs) adoption in software engineering, based on a survey of 46 industry professionals.<n>Results reveal positive perceptions of LLMs, particularly regarding faster resolution of technical questions, improved documentation support, and enhanced source code standardization.<n> respondents also expressed concerns about cognitive dependence, security risks, and the potential erosion of technical autonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T20:57:19Z)
• ScaleCall -- Agentic Tool Calling at Scale for Fintech: Challenges, Methods, and Deployment Insights [0.18643247155980827]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at tool calling, deploying these capabilities in regulated enterprise environments such as toolsets.<n>We present a comprehensive study of tool retrieval methods for enterprise environments through the development and deployment of ScaleCall, a prototype tool-calling framework within Mastercard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T14:35:46Z)
• Generalizable End-to-End Tool-Use RL with Synthetic CodeGym [52.31172214690965]
  We introduce CodeGym, a framework that synthesizes diverse, verifiable, and controllable multi-turn tool-use environments for agent RL.<n>CodeGym rewrites static coding problems into interactive environments by extracting atomic functions or logic into callable tools.<n>Models of varying sizes and chain-of-thought configurations, trained in CodeGym, exhibit consistent out-of-distribution generalizability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T03:03:56Z)
• Explainability as a Compliance Requirement: What Regulated Industries Need from AI Tools for Design Artifact Generation [0.7874708385247352]
  We investigate the explainability gap in AI-driven design artifact generation through semistructured interviews with ten practitioners from safety-critical industries.<n>Our findings reveal that non-explainable AI outputs necessitate extensive manual validation, reduce stakeholder trust, struggle to handle domain-specific terminology, disrupt team collaboration, and introduce regulatory compliance risks.<n>This study outlines a practical roadmap for improving the transparency, reliability, and applicability of AI tools in requirements engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T09:34:39Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models for Real-World Engineering Tasks [75.97299249823972]
  This paper introduces a curated database comprising over 100 questions derived from authentic, production-oriented engineering scenarios.<n>Using this dataset, we evaluate four state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our results show that LLMs demonstrate strengths in basic temporal and structural reasoning but struggle significantly with abstract reasoning, formal modeling, and context-sensitive engineering logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T14:05:23Z)
• An Online Integrated Development Environment for Automated Programming Assessment Systems [4.618037115403291]
  This research contributes to the field of programming education by extracting and defining requirements for an online IDE.<n>The usability of the new online IDE was assessed using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), gathering feedback from 27 first-year students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T12:50:51Z)
• From Expectation to Habit: Why Do Software Practitioners Adopt Fairness Toolkits? [11.05629708648904]
  This study investigates the factors influencing the adoption of fairness toolkits from an individual perspective.<n>Our findings reveal that performance expectancy and habit are the primary drivers of fairness toolkit adoption.<n> Practical recommendations include improving toolkit usability, integrating bias mitigation processes into routine development, and providing ongoing support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T13:38:28Z)
• Gaps Between Research and Practice When Measuring Representational Harms Caused by LLM-Based Systems [88.35461485731162]
  We identify four types of challenges that prevent practitioners from effectively using publicly available instruments for measuring representational harms. Our goal is to advance the development of instruments for measuring representational harms that are well-suited to practitioner needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T22:13:38Z)
• Charting a Path to Efficient Onboarding: The Role of Software Visualization [49.1574468325115]
  The present study aims to explore the familiarity of managers, leaders, and developers with software visualization tools. This approach incorporated quantitative and qualitative analyses of data collected from practitioners using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T21:30:45Z)
• CREATOR: Tool Creation for Disentangling Abstract and Concrete Reasoning of Large Language Models [74.22729793816451]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in utilizing tools, but their ability is limited by API availability. We propose CREATOR, a novel framework that enables LLMs to create their own tools using documentation and code realization. We evaluate CREATOR on MATH and TabMWP benchmarks, respectively consisting of challenging math competition problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:51:52Z)
• LLM-based Interaction for Content Generation: A Case Study on the Perception of Employees in an IT department [85.1523466539595]
  This paper presents a questionnaire survey to identify the intention to use generative tools by employees of an IT company. Our results indicate a rather average acceptability of generative tools, although the more useful the tool is perceived to be, the higher the intention seems to be. Our analyses suggest that the frequency of use of generative tools is likely to be a key factor in understanding how employees perceive these tools in the context of their work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T15:35:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.