Calibrated Confidence Expression for Radiology Report Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29492v1
• Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 09:37:33 GMT
• Title: Calibrated Confidence Expression for Radiology Report Generation
• Abstract summary: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) in radiology report generation require accurate predictions and clinically interpretable indicators.<n>Current state-of-the-art language models are often overconfident, and research on calibration in multimodal settings such as radiology report generation is limited.<n>We introduce ConRad, a medical reinforcement learning framework for fine-tuning LVLMs to produce verbalized confidence estimates alongside radiology reports.
• Score: 33.24673060327421
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Safe deployment of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) in radiology report generation requires not only accurate predictions but also clinically interpretable indicators of when outputs should be thoroughly reviewed, enabling selective radiologist verification and reducing the risk of hallucinated findings influencing clinical decisions. One intuitive approach to this is verbalized confidence, where the model explicitly states its certainty. However, current state-of-the-art language models are often overconfident, and research on calibration in multimodal settings such as radiology report generation is limited. To address this gap, we introduce ConRad (Confidence Calibration for Radiology Reports), a reinforcement learning framework for fine-tuning medical LVLMs to produce calibrated verbalized confidence estimates alongside radiology reports. We study two settings: a single report-level confidence score and a sentence-level variant assigning a confidence to each claim. Both are trained using the GRPO algorithm with reward functions based on the logarithmic scoring rule, which incentivizes truthful self-assessment by penalizing miscalibration and guarantees optimal calibration under reward maximization. Experimentally, ConRad substantially improves calibration and outperforms competing methods. In a clinical evaluation we show that ConRad's report level scores are well aligned with clinicians' judgment. By highlighting full reports or low-confidence statements for targeted review, ConRad can support safer clinical integration of AI-assistance for report generation.

Related papers

• RadFusion: Towards Threshold-Controllable Radiology Report Generation [14.362153373103757]
  Existing generation models offer no control over the sensitivity-specificity trade-off of their diagnostic content.<n>We introduce RadFusion, a framework that equips report generation with threshold controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T05:23:48Z)
• Positive-Unlabeled Preference Optimization For Chest X-ray Report Generation [20.57244883423868]
  We propose PU-DPO, a preference optimization framework to prevent omission noise from corrupting the preference signal.<n>We show that PU-DPO yields consistent gains in detection rates and recovery of hidden positives across multiple pathologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T18:59:23Z)
• Beyond Scalar Scores: Exploring LLM-based Metrics for Clinical Significance Evaluation in Radiology Reports [49.5225801722164]
  Existing metrics obscure this requirement by reducing report quality to a medically ungrounded scalar.<n>We study this boundary using ReEvalMed benchmark as testbed and evaluate metric-level clinical significance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T08:10:30Z)
• RadOT-Eval: Auditable Structured-Evidence Transport for Radiology Report Evaluation [10.674070195561761]
  RadOT-Eval is an interpretable structured-evidence optimal transport framework for offline auditing of radiology report generation.<n>It decomposes reference and candidate reports into attribute-structured clinical evidence units.<n>It aligns corresponding evidence using entropy-regularized optimal transport, and uses clinically meaningful side-channel discrepancies in a monotone risk model to predict error burden.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-07T18:16:56Z)
• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• Guideline-Grounded Evidence Accumulation for High-Stakes Agent Verification [60.18369393468405]
  Existing verifiers usually underperform owing to a lack of domain knowledge and limited calibration.<n>GLEAN compiles expert-curated protocols into trajectory-informed, well-calibrated correctness signals.<n>We empirically validate GLEAN with agentic clinical diagnosis across three diseases from the MIMIC-IV dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T09:36:43Z)
• Suppressing Prior-Comparison Hallucinations in Radiology Report Generation via Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering [94.37535002230504]
  We develop a training-free, inference-time control framework termed Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering.<n>Our approach constructs a semantic-free intervention vector via large language model (LLM)-driven semantic decomposition.<n>We show that our approach significantly reduces the probability of historical hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T04:49:01Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical LLMs: Benchmarking and Enhancing Confidence Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation [97.36081721024728]
  We propose the first benchmark for assessing confidence in multi-turn interaction during realistic medical consultations.<n>Our benchmark unifies three types of medical data for open-ended diagnostic generation.<n>We present MedConf, an evidence-grounded linguistic self-assessment framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T04:51:39Z)
• RadAlign: Advancing Radiology Report Generation with Vision-Language Concept Alignment [10.67889367763112]
  RadAlign is a novel framework that combines the predictive accuracy of vision-language models with the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>Our framework maintains strong clinical interpretability while reducing hallucinations, advancing automated medical imaging and report analysis through integrated predictive and generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T17:55:32Z)
• Semantic Consistency-Based Uncertainty Quantification for Factuality in Radiology Report Generation [20.173287130474797]
  generative medical Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs) are prone to hallucinations and can produce inaccurate diagnostic information.<n>We introduce a novel Semantic Consistency-Based Uncertainty Quantification framework that provides both report-level and sentence-level uncertainties.<n>Our approach improves factuality scores by $10$%, achieved by rejecting $20$% of reports using the textttRadialog model on the MIMIC-CXR dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T20:43:39Z)
• ICON: Improving Inter-Report Consistency in Radiology Report Generation via Lesion-aware Mixup Augmentation [14.479606737135045]
  We propose ICON, which improves the inter-report consistency of radiology report generation. Our approach first involves extracting lesions from input images and examining their characteristics. Then, we introduce a lesion-aware mixup technique to ensure that the representations of the semantically equivalent lesions align with the same attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T09:13:15Z)
• ChatRadio-Valuer: A Chat Large Language Model for Generalizable Radiology Report Generation Based on Multi-institution and Multi-system Data [115.0747462486285]
  ChatRadio-Valuer is a tailored model for automatic radiology report generation that learns generalizable representations. The clinical dataset utilized in this study encompasses a remarkable total of textbf332,673 observations. ChatRadio-Valuer consistently outperforms state-of-the-art models, especially ChatGPT (GPT-3.5-Turbo) and GPT-4 et al.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T17:23:17Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Modeling Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [57.023423137202485]
  Concerns regarding the reliability of medical image segmentation persist among clinicians.<n>We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.<n>By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for medical image segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.