MSA-Thinker: Discrimination-Calibration Reasoning with Hint-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00013v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:48:41 GMT
• Title: MSA-Thinker: Discrimination-Calibration Reasoning with Hint-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis
• Abstract summary: Multimodal sentiment analysis aims to understand human emotions by integrating textual, auditory, and visual modalities.<n>Existing methods incorporating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning are hindered by high annotation costs.<n>We propose a novel training framework that integrates structured Discrimination-Calibration (DC) reasoning with Hint-based Reinforcement Learning.
• Score: 5.1150258716324055
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal sentiment analysis aims to understand human emotions by integrating textual, auditory, and visual modalities. Although Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance via supervised fine-tuning (SFT), their end-to-end "black-box" nature limits interpretability. Existing methods incorporating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning are hindered by high annotation costs, while Reinforcement Learning (RL) faces challenges such as low exploration efficiency and sparse rewards, particularly on hard samples. To address these issues, we propose a novel training framework that integrates structured Discrimination-Calibration (DC) reasoning with Hint-based Reinforcement Learning. First, we perform cold-start SFT using high-quality CoT data synthesized by a teacher model (Qwen3Omni-30B), which inherently contains the DC structure. This equips the model with a reasoning paradigm that performs macro discrimination followed by fine-grained calibration from the initial stage. Building on this, we propose Hint-GRPO, which leverages the discrimination phase within the DC structure as a verifiable anchor during RL to provide directional hints for hard samples, guiding policy optimization and effectively mitigating the reward sparsity problem. Experiments on the Qwen2.5Omni-7B model demonstrate that our method not only achieves higher accuracy in fine-grained sentiment regression tasks but also generates high-quality structured reasoning chains. Crucially, it exhibits superior generalization capability in cross-domain evaluations. This enhances model interpretability while validating the positive contribution of explicit reasoning steps to model robustness, offering a new paradigm for building trustworthy and efficient sentiment analysis systems.

Related papers

• ThinkDeception: A Progressive Reinforcement Learning Framework for Interpretable Multimodal Deception Detection [4.1722537413195395]
  ThinkDeception is a novel and interpretable multimodal deception detection framework.<n>It transforms deception detection from a traditional binary classification task into an explicit cognitive reasoning process.<n>This work successfully drives the field of deception detection toward interpretable, multimodal cognitive reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T12:08:20Z)
• On Predicting the Post-training Potential of Pre-trained LLMs [60.07459271263409]
  We introduce a new task of predicting post-training potential - forecasting a base model's performance before post-training.<n>We propose RuDE, a unified framework that bypasses the generation gap of base models by leveraging response discrimination.<n>Experiments demonstrate a correlation greater than 90% with post-training performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T11:33:49Z)
• Enhancing Multimodal In-Context Learning via Inductive-Deductive Reasoning [65.15766304205657]
  In-context learning (ICL) allows large models to adapt to tasks using a few examples, yet its extension to vision-language models (VLMs) remains fragile.<n>Our analysis reveals that the fundamental limitation lies in an inductive gap, models often produce correct answers from flawed reasoning.<n>We introduce a framework that restructures multimodal ICL as a principled inductive-deductive process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T09:18:19Z)
• Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data [55.84428098924793]
  We propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration.<n>We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance.<n> Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T16:43:28Z)
• CDRRM: Contrast-Driven Rubric Generation for Reliable and Interpretable Reward Modeling [61.75914342638658]
  CDRRM (Contrast-Driven Reward Model) is a framework for high-quality rubric generation and guided preference judgment.<n>This work offers a scalable, interpretable, and data-efficient path for reward modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T07:15:23Z)
• Native Reasoning Models: Training Language Models to Reason on Unverifiable Data [16.065264121785294]
  We introduce NRT (Native Reasoning Training), a novel framework that cultivates complex reasoning.<n>NRT reframes the training problem by treating the reasoning process as a latent variable.<n>NRT achieves state-of-the-art performance among verifier-free methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T04:15:46Z)
• Discovering Process-Outcome Credit in Multi-Step LLM Reasoning [3.584086358722852]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) serves as a potent paradigm for enhancing reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose a novel framework designed to provide continuous reward signals.<n>Our model exhibits superior out-of-distribution robustness, demonstrating promising zero-shot transfer capabilities to unseen and challenging reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T05:44:09Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Reasoning: From Single-Model to Multi-Agent Paradigms [20.241519889633285]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as reasoning systems, where reasoning paradigms play a critical role.<n>We conduct a comprehensive and unified evaluation of reasoning paradigms, spanning direct single-model generation, CoT-augmented single-model reasoning, and representative MAS.<n>We introduce MIMeBench, a new open-ended benchmark that targets two foundational yet underexplored semantic capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T17:23:45Z)
• Latent Chain-of-Thought for Visual Reasoning [53.541579327424046]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is critical for improving the interpretability and reliability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>We reformulate reasoning in LVLMs as posterior inference and propose a scalable training algorithm based on amortized variational inference.<n>We empirically demonstrate that the proposed method enhances the state-of-the-art LVLMs on seven reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T23:10:06Z)
• Unveiling Chain of Step Reasoning for Vision-Language Models with Fine-grained Rewards [48.55501117313608]
  We present chain of step reasoning for vision-language models, enabling assessing reasoning step quality accurately.<n>We present a simple, effective, and fully transparent framework, including the step-level reasoning data, process reward model (PRM), and reinforcement learning training.<n>We believe this paper serves as a baseline for vision-language models and offers insights into more complex multimodal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T13:47:32Z)
• RationAnomaly: Log Anomaly Detection with Rationality via Chain-of-Thought and Reinforcement Learning [27.235259453535537]
  RationAnomaly is a novel framework that enhances log anomaly detection by synergizing Chain-of-Thought fine-tuning with reinforcement learning.<n>We have released the corresponding resources, including code and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T07:35:58Z)
• Supervised Optimism Correction: Be Confident When LLMs Are Sure [91.7459076316849]
  We establish a novel theoretical connection between supervised fine-tuning and offline reinforcement learning.<n>We show that the widely used beam search method suffers from unacceptable over-optimism.<n>We propose Supervised Optimism Correction, which introduces a simple yet effective auxiliary loss for token-level $Q$-value estimations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T07:50:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.