A Reasoning-Enabled Vision-Language Foundation Model for Chest X-ray Interpretation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00493v1
• Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 05:19:09 GMT
• Title: A Reasoning-Enabled Vision-Language Foundation Model for Chest X-ray Interpretation
• Abstract summary: We present CheXOne, a reasoning-enabled vision-language model for CXR interpretation.<n>CheXOne jointly generates diagnostic predictions and explicit, clinically grounded reasoning traces.<n>We show that CheXOne-drafted reports are comparable to or better than resident-written reports in 55% of cases.
• Score: 48.23500302185585
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Chest X-rays (CXRs) are among the most frequently performed imaging examinations worldwide, yet rising imaging volumes increase radiologist workload and the risk of diagnostic errors. Although artificial intelligence (AI) systems have shown promise for CXR interpretation, most generate only final predictions, without making explicit how visual evidence is translated into radiographic findings and diagnostic predictions. We present CheXOne, a reasoning-enabled vision-language model for CXR interpretation. CheXOne jointly generates diagnostic predictions and explicit, clinically grounded reasoning traces that connect visual evidence, radiographic findings, and these predictions. The model is trained on 14.7 million instruction and reasoning samples curated from 30 public datasets spanning 36 CXR interpretation tasks, using a two-stage framework that combines instruction tuning with reinforcement learning to improve reasoning quality. We evaluate CheXOne in zero-shot settings across visual question answering, report generation, visual grounding and reasoning assessment, covering 17 evaluation settings. CheXOne outperforms existing medical and general-domain foundation models and achieves strong performance on independent public benchmarks. A clinical reader study demonstrates that CheXOne-drafted reports are comparable to or better than resident-written reports in 55% of cases, while effectively addressing clinical indications and enhancing both report writing and CXR interpretation efficiency. Further analyses involving radiologists reveal that the generated reasoning traces show high clinical factuality and provide causal support for the final predictions, offering a plausible explanation for the performance gains. These results suggest that explicit reasoning can improve model performance, interpretability and clinical utility in AI-assisted CXR interpretation.

Related papers

• A DeepSeek-Powered AI System for Automated Chest Radiograph Interpretation in Clinical Practice [83.11942224668127]
  Janus-Pro-CXR (1B) is a chest X-ray interpretation system based on DeepSeek Janus-Pro model.<n>Our system outperforms state-of-the-art X-ray report generation models in automated report generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T13:26:13Z)
• Reasoning Visual Language Model for Chest X-Ray Analysis [30.318629424154206]
  We present a framework that brings chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to chest X-ray interpretation.<n>Inspired by reasoning-first training paradigms, our approach is designed to learn how experts reason, not just what they conclude.<n>We release code and the model NV-Reason-CXR-3B to support community progress toward trustworthy, explainable AI in chest radiography.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T00:48:00Z)
• CXRAgent: Director-Orchestrated Multi-Stage Reasoning for Chest X-Ray Interpretation [62.0150409256153]
  We propose CXRAgent, a director-orchestrated, multi-stage agent for CXR interpretation.<n>The agent strategically orchestrates a set of CXR-analysis tools, with outputs normalized and verified by the Evidence-driven Validator.<n>Experiments on various CXR interpretation tasks show that CXRAgent delivers strong performance, providing visual evidence and generalizes well to clinical tasks of different complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T10:31:30Z)
• A Foundation Model for Chest X-ray Interpretation with Grounded Reasoning via Online Reinforcement Learning [41.27625400846057]
  DeepMedix-R1 is a holistic medical FM for chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation.<n>It generates both an answer and reasoning steps tied to the image's local regions for each query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T06:00:04Z)
• X-Ray-CoT: Interpretable Chest X-ray Diagnosis with Vision-Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [0.0]
  We propose X-Ray-CoT (Chest X-Ray Chain-of-Thought), a novel framework for intelligent chest X-ray diagnosis and interpretable report generation.<n>X-Ray-CoT simulates human radiologists' "chain-of-thought" by first extracting multi-modal features and visual concepts.<n>It achieves competitive quantitative performance, with a Balanced Accuracy of 80.52% and F1 score of 78.65% for disease diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-17T18:00:41Z)
• RadFabric: Agentic AI System with Reasoning Capability for Radiology [61.25593938175618]
  RadFabric is a multi agent, multimodal reasoning framework that unifies visual and textual analysis for comprehensive CXR interpretation.<n>System employs specialized CXR agents for pathology detection, an Anatomical Interpretation Agent to map visual findings to precise anatomical structures, and a Reasoning Agent powered by large multimodal reasoning models to synthesize visual, anatomical, and clinical data into transparent and evidence based diagnoses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T03:10:33Z)
• Interpreting Chest X-rays Like a Radiologist: A Benchmark with Clinical Reasoning [18.15610003617933]
  We present CXRTrek, a new multi-stage visual question answering (VQA) dataset for chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation.<n>The dataset is designed to explicitly simulate the diagnostic reasoning process employed by radiologists in real-world clinical settings.<n>We propose a new vision-language large model (VLLM), CXRTrekNet, specifically designed to incorporate the clinical reasoning flow into the framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T06:30:40Z)
• CXR-Agent: Vision-language models for chest X-ray interpretation with uncertainty aware radiology reporting [0.0]
  We evaluate the publicly available, state of the art, foundational vision-language models for chest X-ray interpretation. We find that vision-language models often hallucinate with confident language, which slows down clinical interpretation. We develop an agent-based vision-language approach for report generation using CheXagent's linear probes and BioViL-T's phrase grounding tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T18:39:19Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Medical Diagnostic Phrase Identification and Grounding [72.18719355481052]
  We introduce a novel task called Medical Report Grounding (MRG)<n>MRG aims to directly identify diagnostic phrases and their corresponding grounding boxes from medical reports in an end-to-end manner.<n>We propose uMedGround, a robust and reliable framework that leverages a multimodal large language model to predict diagnostic phrases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T07:41:35Z)
• This Patient Looks Like That Patient: Prototypical Networks for Interpretable Diagnosis Prediction from Clinical Text [56.32427751440426]
  In clinical practice such models must not only be accurate, but provide doctors with interpretable and helpful results. We introduce ProtoPatient, a novel method based on prototypical networks and label-wise attention. We evaluate the model on two publicly available clinical datasets and show that it outperforms existing baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-16T10:12:07Z)
• Variational Knowledge Distillation for Disease Classification in Chest X-Rays [102.04931207504173]
  We propose itvariational knowledge distillation (VKD), which is a new probabilistic inference framework for disease classification based on X-rays. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on three public benchmark datasets with paired X-ray images and EHRs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-19T14:13:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.