Fast and Accurate Probing of In-Training LLMs' Downstream Performances

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01025v1
• Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 15:32:56 GMT
• Title: Fast and Accurate Probing of In-Training LLMs' Downstream Performances
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new in-training evaluation paradigm that uses a lightweight probe for monitoring downstream performance.<n>We design several probe architectures, validating their effectiveness using the OLMo3-7B's checkpoints.<n>The probes can accurately predict a checkpoint's performance (with avg. AUROC$>$0.75), have decent generalizability across checkpoints (earlier predicts later), and reduce the computation latency from $sim$1 hr (using conventional generative evaluation method) to $sim$3 min.
• Score: 8.19937867582885
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The paradigm of scaling Large Language Models (LLMs) in both parameter size and test time has pushed the boundaries of AI capabilities, but at the cost of making the traditional generative evaluation paradigm prohibitively expensive, therefore making the latency of LLM's in-training downstream performance evaluation unbearable. However, simple metrics like training loss (perplexity) are not always correlated with downstream performance, as sometimes their trends diverge from the actual task outcomes. This dilemma calls for a method that is computationally efficient and sufficiently accurate in measuring model capabilities. To address this challenge, we introduce a new in-training evaluation paradigm that uses a lightweight probe for monitoring downstream performance. The probes take the internal representations of LLM checkpoints (during training) as input and directly predict the checkpoint's performance on downstream tasks measured by success probability (i.e., pass@1). We design several probe architectures, validating their effectiveness using the OLMo3-7B's checkpoints across a diverse set of downstream tasks. The probes can accurately predict a checkpoint's performance (with avg. AUROC$>$0.75), have decent generalizability across checkpoints (earlier predicts later), and reduce the computation latency from $\sim$1 hr (using conventional generative evaluation method) to $\sim$3 min. In sum, this work presents a practical and scalable in-training downstream evaluation paradigm, enabling a more agile, informed, and efficient LLM development process.

Related papers

• Beyond Solvability: Task Learnability as a Static Prior for LLM RL Post-Training [52.78248352851176]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central post-training paradigm for eliciting reasoning capabilities in large language models.<n>We study this residual axis as task learnability: a regime-conditional measure of expected positive response to continued training.<n>We propose TrajVal, a lightweight probe-based estimator that approximates per-task learnability from a short probe run and two endpoint evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T07:43:05Z)
• Instability in Downstream Task Performance During LLM Pretraining [12.840216854750565]
  We investigate the stability of downstream task performance in a large language model (LLMs) trained on diverse web-scale corpora.<n>We find that task scores frequently fluctuate throughout training, both at the aggregate and example levels.<n>To address this instability, we investigate two post-hoc checkpoint integration methods: checkpoint averaging and ensemble.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T14:33:38Z)
• Understanding the Role of Training Data in Test-Time Scaling [56.12341509545198]
  We study the performance of test-time scaling for transformers trained on an in-context weight prediction task for linear regression.<n>We show that training on a diverse, relevant, and hard set of tasks results in best performance for test-time scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T01:38:48Z)
• Can Prompt Difficulty be Online Predicted for Accelerating RL Finetuning of Reasoning Models? [65.18157595903124]
  This work investigates iterative approximate evaluation for arbitrary prompts.<n>It introduces Model Predictive Prompt Selection (MoPPS), a Bayesian risk-predictive framework.<n>MoPPS reliably predicts prompt difficulty and accelerates training with significantly reduced rollouts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T03:20:52Z)
• Runaway is Ashamed, But Helpful: On the Early-Exit Behavior of Large Language Model-based Agents in Embodied Environments [54.67512489842682]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong planning and decision-making capabilities in complex embodied environments.<n>We take a first step toward exploring the early-exit behavior for LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T08:23:36Z)
• Investigating task-specific prompts and sparse autoencoders for activation monitoring [0.0]
  Internal activations of language models encode additional information that could be useful for this.<n>Recent work has proposed several approaches which may improve on naive linear probing.<n>We develop and test novel refinements of these methods and compare them against each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T21:28:17Z)
• Can Pre-training Indicators Reliably Predict Fine-tuning Outcomes of LLMs? [42.608899417822656]
  We construct a dataset using 50 1B parameter LLM variants with systematically varied pre-training configurations.<n>We introduce novel unsupervised and supervised proxy metrics derived from pre-training that successfully reduce the relative performance prediction error rate by over 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T21:19:09Z)
• Unveiling Downstream Performance Scaling of LLMs: A Clustering-Based Perspective [7.408649506385476]
  The escalating scale and cost of Large Language Models (LLMs) training necessitate accurate pre-training prediction of downstream task performance.<n>Current prediction methods lack accuracy and reliability.<n>We propose a Clustering-On-Difficulty (COD) framework for downstream performance prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T15:44:57Z)
• S$^2$R: Teaching LLMs to Self-verify and Self-correct via Reinforcement Learning [51.84977135926156]
  We introduce S$2$R, an efficient framework that enhances LLM reasoning by teaching models to self-verify and self-correct during inference.<n>Our results demonstrate that Qwen2.5-math-7B achieves an accuracy improvement from 51.0% to 81.6%, outperforming models trained on an equivalent amount of long-CoT distilled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T13:40:22Z)
• Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMs [75.28559015477137]
  This work focuses on the pre-training loss as a more computation-efficient metric for performance estimation.<n>We present FLP-M, a fundamental approach for performance prediction that addresses the practical need to integrate datasets from multiple sources during pre-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T04:57:48Z)
• Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters [27.656263126925815]
  We study the scaling of inference-time computation in LLMs. We find that in both cases, the effectiveness of different approaches to scaling test-time compute critically varies depending on the difficulty of the prompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T17:35:05Z)
• Making Pre-trained Language Models both Task-solvers and Self-calibrators [52.98858650625623]
  Pre-trained language models (PLMs) serve as backbones for various real-world systems. Previous work shows that introducing an extra calibration task can mitigate this issue. We propose a training algorithm LM-TOAST to tackle the challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T02:51:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.