Identifying Privacy Concerns in Upcoming Software Release: A Peek into the Future

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01393v1
• Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 20:51:14 GMT
• Title: Identifying Privacy Concerns in Upcoming Software Release: A Peek into the Future
• Abstract summary: We introduce Pre-PI, a novel approach that summarizes privacy concerns for to-be-released features.<n>We compare it with Hark, a state-of-the-art method that relies on post-release user feedback to identify privacy concerns.
• Score: 2.379144469644808
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Identifying the features to be released in the next version of software, from a pool of potential candidates, is a challenging problem. User feedback from app stores is frequently used by software vendors for the evolution of apps across releases. Privacy feedback, although smaller in volume, carries a larger impact influencing app's success. Multiple existing work has focused on summarizing privacy concerns at the app level and has also shown that developers utilize feedback to implement security and privacy-related changes in subsequent releases. However, the current literature offers little support for release managers and developers in identifying privacy concerns prior to release. This gap exists as user reviews are typically available in app stores only after new features of a software system is released. In this paper, we introduce Pre-PI, a novel approach that summarizes privacy concerns for to-be-released features. Our method first maps existing features to semantically similar privacy reviews to learn feature-privacy review relations. We then simulate feedback for candidate features and generate concise summaries of privacy concerns. We evaluate Pre-PI across three real-world apps, and compare it with Hark, a state-of-the-art method that relies on post-release user feedback to identify privacy concerns. Results show that Pre-PI generates additional valid privacy concerns and identifies these concerns earlier than Hark, allowing proactive mitigation prior to release.

Related papers

• PrivacyAssist: A User-Centric Agent Framework for Detecting Privacy Inconsistencies in Android Apps [0.9892966978799635]
  This paper presents PrivacyAssist, a multi-agent LLM-based platform that detects inconsistencies between user-granted permissions and developers' declared sensitive data collection and sharing practices.<n>We evaluate PrivacyAssist with 200 users and 2,347 Android apps, finding that only 16% of apps are fully consistent between granted permissions and declared data practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-25T10:58:05Z)
• Do Phone-Use Agents Respect Your Privacy? [97.81424230136075]
  We introduce MyPhoneBench, a verifiable evaluation framework for privacy behavior in mobile agents.<n>We operationalize privacy-respecting phone use as permissioned access, minimal disclosure, and user-controlled memory through a minimal privacy contract.<n>Across five frontier models on 10 mobile apps and 300 tasks, we find that task success, privacy-compliant task completion, and later-session use of saved preferences are distinct capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T14:50:50Z)
• Differentially Private Synthetic Data Release for Topics API Outputs [63.79476766779742]
  We focus on one Privacy-Preserving Ads API: the Topics API, part of Google Chrome's Privacy Sandbox.<n>We generate a differentially-private dataset that closely matches the re-identification risk properties of the real Topics API data.<n>We hope this will enable external researchers to analyze the API in-depth and replicate prior and future work on a realistic large-scale dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T13:46:57Z)
• Privacy Bills of Materials: A Transparent Privacy Information Inventory for Collaborative Privacy Notice Generation in Mobile App Development [23.41168782020005]
  We introduce PriBOM, a systematic software engineering approach to better capture and coordinate mobile app privacy information.<n>PriBOM facilitates transparency-centric privacy documentation and specific privacy notice creation, enabling traceability and trackability of privacy practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T08:14:52Z)
• On the Differential Privacy and Interactivity of Privacy Sandbox Reports [78.85958224681858]
  The Privacy Sandbox initiative from Google includes APIs for enabling privacy-preserving advertising functionalities.<n>We provide an abstract model for analyzing the privacy of these APIs and show that they satisfy a formal DP guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-22T08:22:57Z)
• Assessing Privacy Compliance of Android Third-Party SDKs [16.975384208528972]
  Third-party Software Development Kits (SDKs) are widely adopted in Android app development.<n>This convenience raises substantial concerns about unauthorized access to users' privacy-sensitive information.<n>Our study offers a targeted analysis of user privacy protection among Android third-party SDKs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T15:44:43Z)
• ATLAS: Automatically Detecting Discrepancies Between Privacy Policies and Privacy Labels [2.457872341625575]
  We introduce the Automated Privacy Label Analysis System (ATLAS) ATLAS identifies possible discrepancies between mobile app privacy policies and their privacy labels. We find that, on average, apps have 5.32 such potential compliance issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T05:27:22Z)
• Mining User Privacy Concern Topics from App Reviews [10.776958968245589]
  An increasing number of users are voicing their privacy concerns through app reviews on App stores. The main challenge of effectively mining privacy concerns from user reviews lies in the fact that reviews expressing privacy concerns are overridden by a large number of reviews expressing more generic themes and noisy content. In this work, we propose a novel automated approach to overcome that challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T08:07:27Z)
• SPAct: Self-supervised Privacy Preservation for Action Recognition [73.79886509500409]
  Existing approaches for mitigating privacy leakage in action recognition require privacy labels along with the action labels from the video dataset. Recent developments of self-supervised learning (SSL) have unleashed the untapped potential of the unlabeled data. We present a novel training framework which removes privacy information from input video in a self-supervised manner without requiring privacy labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T02:56:40Z)
• Analysis of Longitudinal Changes in Privacy Behavior of Android Applications [79.71330613821037]
  In this paper, we examine the trends in how Android apps have changed over time with respect to privacy. We examine the adoption of HTTPS, whether apps scan the device for other installed apps, the use of permissions for privacy-sensitive data, and the use of unique identifiers. We find that privacy-related behavior has improved with time as apps continue to receive updates, and that the third-party libraries used by apps are responsible for more issues with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-28T16:21:31Z)
• Emerging App Issue Identification via Online Joint Sentiment-Topic Tracing [66.57888248681303]
  We propose a novel emerging issue detection approach named MERIT. Based on the AOBST model, we infer the topics negatively reflected in user reviews for one app version. Experiments on popular apps from Google Play and Apple's App Store demonstrate the effectiveness of MERIT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-23T06:34:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.