A Pragmatist Understanding of Quantum Mechanics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02197v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 15:51:51 GMT
• Title: A Pragmatist Understanding of Quantum Mechanics
• Abstract summary: We can understand quantum mechanics by understanding how we have applied it.<n>When applied to a quantum state, quantum mechanics yields probabiities for physical events.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Applications of quantum mechanics have led to many successful predictions and explanations of puzzling phenomena, and we now apply quantum mechanics to gain, process, and communicate information in novel ways. We can understand quantum mechanics by understanding how we have applied it. We should not seek agreement on the nature of the world it represents, because this theory does not itself represent the physical world (though its applications do help us to represent it better). When applied to a quantum state, quantum mechanics yields probabiities for physical events: both state and probability are objective--not because they represent elements of phyiscal reality, but because each exerts norrmative authority over the beliefs of anyone who accepts quantum mechanics and applies it relative to a physical situation they may (but need not) occupy. These events may be described by statements that are meaningful in an appropriate environmental context, and quantum mechanics can help one to say when that is. Measurement creates an appropriate context, so here the Born rule indirectly yields probabilities of measurement outcomes. The quantum state of a system does not "collapse" on measurement: a new state must be assigned relative to a physical situation in which information about the outcome is accessible. Understood this way, there is no measurement problem, and violations of Bell inequalities does not demonstrate "spooky" non-local action. Quantum field theories have no physical ontology of their own: a quantum field is a mathematical object in a model whose application helps us to improve and extend our descriptions of the world in other terms. We cannot realise the scenario of Wigner's friend and its recent extensions: but the data that provide overwhelming evidence for quantum mechanics are objective in the same sense as the relative measurement outcomes described in those scenarios.

Related papers

• Perspectives in and on Quantum Theory [0.0]
  quantum theory offers reliable advice on when to expect an event of one kind or another.<n> Measurement outcomes and quantum states are both perspectival.<n>We should accept quantum theory because the statistics these outcomes display are just those it leads us to expect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T13:34:09Z)
• Counterfactuals in Macroscopic Quantum Physics: Irreversibility, Measurement and Locality [0.0]
  We argue that measurement, irreversibility and locality can all appear to challenge the universality of quantum theory.<n>We find novel features of quantum thermodynamics relating to irreversibility, information erasure and coherence.<n>This reveals new ways of characterising the quantum information stored in entanglement and quantum branching structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T20:14:17Z)
• A decision-theoretic approach to dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics [39.146761527401424]
  We provide a decision-theoretic framework for dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics.<n>We show that measurements play the role of acts with an uncertain outcome.<n>We discuss the mathematical implications of our findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T14:53:06Z)
• Quantum-like cognition and decision making in the light of quantum measurement theory [0.0]
  We characterize the class of quantum measurements that matches the applications of quantum theory to cognition.<n>We highlight the role of it noncommutativity of the state update maps generated by measurement back action''<n>We speculate that distinguishing quantum-like properties of the cognitive effects are the expressions of the latter, or possibly both.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T18:30:44Z)
• Against (unitary) interpretation (of quantum mechanics): removing the metaphysical load [0.0]
  In June 1925 Heisenberg arrived at Helgoland/Heligoland island to escape a fit of hay fever.<n>He returned with a sketch of a strange theory of the micro-world, which we now call quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T16:19:44Z)
• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• Is there a finite complete set of monotones in any quantum resource theory? [39.58317527488534]
  We show that there does not exist a finite set of resource monotones which completely determines all state transformations. We show that totally ordered theories allow for free transformations between all pure states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T18:28:36Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Quantization of Reality, another Epistemological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics? [0.0]
  The interpretation of quantum mechanics is still in an unacceptable status. For the sake of human curiosity and to get a better understanding of the universe we are living in, this attitude should be changed. A possibly interesting new approach is outlined in this article, which may help adjust the focus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-07T15:41:26Z)
• Do qubits dream of entangled sheep? Quantum measurement without classical output [0.0]
  We introduce an entirely quantum notion of measurement, called a sensation, to account for quantum agents that experience the world through quantum sensors. Sensations eschew probabilities and instead describe a deterministic flow of quantum information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T18:00:11Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.