Towards Position-Robust Talent Recommendation via Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02200v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 15:54:03 GMT
• Title: Towards Position-Robust Talent Recommendation via Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: We propose L3TR, a novel framework for listwise talent recommendation with large language models (LLMs)<n>In this paper, we propose a block attention mechanism and a local positional encoding method to enhance inter-document processing and mitigate the position bias and concurrent token bias issue.<n>Experiments on two real-world datasets validated the effectiveness of L3TR, showing consistent improvements over existing baselines.
• Score: 2.145037859243627
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Talent recruitment is a critical, yet costly process for many industries, with high recruitment costs and long hiring cycles. Existing talent recommendation systems increasingly adopt large language models (LLMs) due to their remarkable language understanding capabilities. However, most prior approaches follow a pointwise paradigm, which requires LLMs to repeatedly process some text and fails to capture the relationships among candidates in the list, resulting in higher token consumption and suboptimal recommendations. Besides, LLMs exhibit position bias and the lost-in-the-middle issue when answering multiple-choice questions and processing multiple long documents. To address these issues, we introduce an implicit strategy to utilize LLM's potential output for the recommendation task and propose L3TR, a novel framework for listwise talent recommendation with LLMs. In this framework, we propose a block attention mechanism and a local positional encoding method to enhance inter-document processing and mitigate the position bias and concurrent token bias issue. We also introduce an ID sampling method for resolving the inconsistency between candidate set sizes in the training phase and the inference phase. We design evaluation methods to detect position bias and token bias and training-free debiasing methods. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets validated the effectiveness of L3TR, showing consistent improvements over existing baselines.

Related papers

• Is Your LLM-as-a-Recommender Agent Trustable? LLMs' Recommendation is Easily Hacked by Biases (Preferences) [28.6608041553667]
  We introduce a textbfBias textbfRecommendation textbfBenchmark to highlight the critical vulnerability of such agents to biases in high-value real-world tasks.<n>The benchmark includes three practical domains: paper review, e-commerce, and job recruitment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T06:50:48Z)
• Evaluating Position Bias in Large Language Model Recommendations [3.430780143519032]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly explored as general-purpose tools for recommendation tasks.<n>We show that LLM-based recommendation models suffer from position bias, where the order of candidate items in a prompt can disproportionately influence the recommendations produced by LLMs.<n>We introduce a new prompting strategy to mitigate the position bias of LLM recommendation models called Ranking via Iterative SElection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T03:30:26Z)
• QPO: Query-dependent Prompt Optimization via Multi-Loop Offline Reinforcement Learning [58.767866109043055]
  We introduce Query-dependent Prompt Optimization (QPO), which iteratively fine-tune a small pretrained language model to generate optimal prompts tailored to the input queries.<n>We derive insights from offline prompting demonstration data, which already exists in large quantities as a by-product of benchmarking diverse prompts on open-sourced tasks.<n> Experiments on various LLM scales and diverse NLP and math tasks demonstrate the efficacy and cost-efficiency of our method in both zero-shot and few-shot scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T03:06:48Z)
• On Speeding Up Language Model Evaluation [48.51924035873411]
  We propose an $textitadaptive$ approach to explore this space.<n>We lean on multi-armed bandits to sequentially identify the next (method, validation sample)-pair to evaluate.<n>We show that it can identify the top-performing method using only 5-15% of the typical resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:48:42Z)
• Aligning Language Models with Demonstrated Feedback [58.834937450242975]
  Demonstration ITerated Task Optimization (DITTO) directly aligns language model outputs to a user's demonstrated behaviors.<n>We evaluate DITTO's ability to learn fine-grained style and task alignment across domains such as news articles, emails, and blog posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T23:13:56Z)
• Found in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts Better via Plug-and-Play Positional Encoding [78.36702055076456]
  This paper introduces Multi-scale Positional. (Ms-PoE) which is a simple yet effective plug-and-play approach to enhance the capacity of. LLMs to handle relevant information located in the middle of the context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T04:58:37Z)
• Large Language Models are Not Stable Recommender Systems [45.941176155464824]
  We introduce exploratory research and find consistent patterns of positional bias in large language models (LLMs) We propose a Bayesian probabilistic framework, STELLA (Stable LLM for Recommendation), which involves a two-stage pipeline. Our framework can capitalize on existing pattern information to calibrate instability of LLMs, and enhance recommendation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-25T14:54:33Z)
• Sample Efficient Preference Alignment in LLMs via Active Exploration [63.84454768573154]
  We take advantage of the fact that one can often choose contexts at which to obtain human feedback to most efficiently identify a good policy.<n>We propose an active exploration algorithm to efficiently select the data and provide theoretical proof that it has a worst-case regret bound.<n>Our method outperforms the baselines with limited samples of human preferences on several language models and four real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T00:54:02Z)
• ReLLa: Retrieval-enhanced Large Language Models for Lifelong Sequential Behavior Comprehension in Recommendation [43.270424225285105]
  We focus on adapting and empowering a pure large language model for zero-shot and few-shot recommendation tasks. We propose Retrieval-enhanced Large Language models (ReLLa) for recommendation tasks in both zero-shot and few-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T02:25:04Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey [53.6014921995006]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive textual corpora have emerged as leading solutions for a broad array of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite their notable performance, these models are prone to certain limitations such as misunderstanding human instructions, generating potentially biased content, or factually incorrect information. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of these alignment technologies, including the following aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T17:44:58Z)
• Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Rankers for Recommender Systems [76.02500186203929]
  This work aims to investigate the capacity of large language models (LLMs) to act as the ranking model for recommender systems. We show that LLMs have promising zero-shot ranking abilities but struggle to perceive the order of historical interactions. We demonstrate that these issues can be alleviated using specially designed prompting and bootstrapping strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T17:57:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.