Analysis of Optimality of Large Language Models on Planning Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02910v1
• Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 09:27:16 GMT
• Title: Analysis of Optimality of Large Language Models on Planning Problems
• Abstract summary: We show that Reasoning-enhanced Large Language Model (LLM) planners track theoretical optimality limits with near-perfect precision.<n>We also study a formally equivalent task, the generalized Path-Star ($P*$) graph, in order to isolate true topological reasoning from semantic priors.
• Score: 12.31072556856411
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Classic AI planning problems have been revisited in the Large Language Model (LLM) era, with a focus of recent benchmarks on success rates rather than plan efficiency. We examine the degree to which frontier models reason optimally versus relying on simple, heuristic, and possibly inefficient strategies. We focus on the Blocksworld domain involving towers of labeled blocks which have to be moved from an initial to a goal configuration via a set of primitive actions. We also study a formally equivalent task, the generalized Path-Star ($P^*$) graph, in order to isolate true topological reasoning from semantic priors. We systematically manipulate problem depth (the height of block towers), width (the number of towers), and compositionality (the number of goal blocks). Reasoning-enhanced LLMs significantly outperform traditional satisficing planners (e.g., LAMA) in complex, multi-goal configurations. Although classical search algorithms hit a wall as the search space expands, LLMs track theoretical optimality limits with near-perfect precision, even when domain-specific semantic hints are stripped away. To explain these surprising findings, we consider (and find evidence to support) two hypotheses: an active Algorithmic Simulation executed via reasoning tokens and a Geometric Memory that allows models to represent the $P^*$ topology as a navigable global geometry, effectively bypassing exponential combinatorial complexity.

Related papers

• Can LLMs Prove Robotic Path Planning Optimality? A Benchmark for Research-Level Algorithm Verification [5.637461397736495]
  We introduce the first benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on approximation-ratio proofs of robotic path planning algorithms.<n>Our evaluation reveals that even the strongest models struggle to produce fully valid proofs without external domain knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T20:55:46Z)
• TDA-RC: Task-Driven Alignment for Knowledge-Based Reasoning Chains in Large Language Models [54.20787536978013]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) paradigm dominates practical applications for its single-round efficiency, yet its reasoning chains often exhibit logical gaps.<n>This paper proposes a topology-based method for optimizing reasoning chains.<n>We show that our approach offers a superior balance between reasoning accuracy and efficiency, showcasing a practical solution to single-round generation with multi-round intelligence''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T13:01:01Z)
• On Multi-Step Theorem Prediction via Non-Parametric Structural Priors [50.16583672681106]
  In this work, we explore training-free theorem prediction through the lens of in-context learning (ICL)<n>We propose Theorem Precedence Graphs, which encode temporal dependencies from historical solution traces as directed graphs, and impose explicit topological constraints that effectively prune the search space during inference.<n>Experiments on the FormalGeo7k benchmark show that our method achieves 89.29% accuracy, substantially outperforming ICL baselines and matching state-of-the-art supervised models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T06:08:50Z)
• TangramPuzzle: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models with Compositional Spatial Reasoning [104.66714520975837]
  We introduce a geometry-grounded benchmark designed to evaluate compositional spatial reasoning through the lens of the classic Tangram game.<n>We propose the Tangram Construction Expression (TCE), a symbolic geometric framework that grounds tangram assemblies in exact, machine-verifiable coordinate specifications.<n>We conduct extensive evaluation experiments on advanced open-source and proprietary models, revealing an interesting insight: MLLMs tend to prioritize matching the target silhouette while neglecting geometric constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T07:35:05Z)
• Multi-Objective Hierarchical Optimization with Large Language Models [41.41567058185742]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are not the off-the-shelf choice to drive multi-objective optimization yet.<n>In this paper, we close this gap by leveraging LLMs as surrogate models and candidate samplers inside a structured hierarchical search strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T12:10:13Z)
• OFA-MAS: One-for-All Multi-Agent System Topology Design based on Mixture-of-Experts Graph Generative Models [57.94189874119267]
  Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) offer a powerful paradigm for solving complex problems.<n>Current graph learning-based design methodologies often adhere to a "one-for-one" paradigm.<n>We propose OFA-TAD, a one-for-all framework that generates adaptive collaboration graphs for any task described in natural language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T12:23:44Z)
• Geometrically-Constrained Agent for Spatial Reasoning [53.93718394870856]
  Vision Language Models exhibit a fundamental semantic-to-geometric gap in spatial reasoning.<n>Current paradigms fail to bridge this gap.<n>We propose a training-free agentic paradigm that resolves this gap by introducing a formal task constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T17:50:37Z)
• seqBench: A Tunable Benchmark to Quantify Sequential Reasoning Limits of LLMs [1.0519693622157462]
  We introduce seqBench, a benchmark for probing sequential reasoning limits in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We find that even top-performing models systematically fail on seqBench's structured reasoning tasks despite minimal search complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-21T01:32:13Z)
• Supervised Chain of Thought [5.389461633686935]
  Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting offers a promising approach to solving complex reasoning tasks. One-prompt-for-all approach poses significant challenges for models to generate the correct reasoning steps. We show how task-specific supervision is essential for navigating the prompt space accurately and achieving optimal performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T06:25:27Z)
• LLM-A*: Large Language Model Enhanced Incremental Heuristic Search on Path Planning [91.95362946266577]
  Path planning is a fundamental scientific problem in robotics and autonomous navigation.<n>Traditional algorithms like A* and its variants are capable of ensuring path validity but suffer from significant computational and memory inefficiencies as the state space grows.<n>We propose a new LLM based route planning method that synergistically combines the precise pathfinding capabilities of A* with the global reasoning capability of LLMs.<n>This hybrid approach aims to enhance pathfinding efficiency in terms of time and space complexity while maintaining the integrity of path validity, especially in large-scale scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T01:24:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.