Incentives shape how humans co-create with generative AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03529v1
• Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2026 00:18:51 GMT
• Title: Incentives shape how humans co-create with generative AI
• Abstract summary: We show that incentives mediate AI's homogenizing force in a creative writing task.<n>Our results reveal that the effects of generative AI depend not only on the technology itself, but also the behavioral strategies and incentive structures surrounding its use.
• Score: 3.182696575286433
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI is quickly becoming an integral part of people's everyday workflows. Early evidence has shown that while generative AI can increase individual-level productivity, it does so at the cost of collective diversity, potentially narrowing the set of ideas and perspectives produced. Our research stands in contrast to this concern: through a pre-registered randomized control trial, we show that incentives mediate AI's homogenizing force in a creative writing task where participants can use AI interactively. Participants rewarded for originality relative to peers produce collectively more diverse writing than those rewarded for quality alone. This divergence is driven not by abandoning AI, but by how participants use it: those incentivized for originality incorporate fewer AI suggestions verbatim, relying on the model more selectively for brainstorming, proofreading, and targeted edits. Our results reveal that the effects of generative AI depend not only on the technology itself, but also the behavioral strategies and incentive structures surrounding its use.

Related papers

• Nonslop: A Gamified Experiment in Human-AI Collaborative Writing [4.079191726815924]
  The study focuses on when users choose to maintain creative autonomy versus violating the rules of the game and accepting AI assistance.<n>This gamified approach offers both a framework for studying authentic human-AI interaction and a provocative lens for understanding the tension between efficiency and authenticity in AI-augmented creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T17:21:38Z)
• Characterizing initial human-AI proof formalization workflows [66.06866890889131]
  Advances in AI systems' ability to generate code and engage in increasingly high-level mathematical reasoning promise to transform people's ability to formalize and thereby verify proofs.<n>We conduct a mixed-methods analysis into the initial impact of AI on people's formalization.<n>A qualitative survey shows that people's preferences are diverse, but with a general desire for AI assistance in formalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T22:58:19Z)
• The Future of AI is Many, Not One [0.0]
  We show why we should expect breakthroughs from groups of AI agents working together rather than singular superintelligent agents.<n>Having a diverse team broadens the search for solutions, delays premature consensus, and allows for the pursuit of unconventional approaches.<n>The upshot, we argue, is that the future of transformative transformer-based AI is fundamentally many, not one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T23:31:38Z)
• Competition and Diversity in Generative AI [3.1507640991166603]
  We show that competitive markets select for diverse AI models, mitigating monoculture.<n>A generative AI model that performs well in isolation (i.e., according to a benchmark) may fail to provide value in a compet- itive market.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T18:34:31Z)
• Augmenting Minds or Automating Skills: The Differential Role of Human Capital in Generative AI's Impact on Creative Tasks [4.39919134458872]
  Generative AI is rapidly reshaping creative work, raising critical questions about its beneficiaries and societal implications.<n>This study challenges prevailing assumptions by exploring how generative AI interacts with diverse forms of human capital in creative tasks.<n>While AI democratizes access to creative tools, it simultaneously amplifies cognitive inequalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T08:27:14Z)
• Human Bias in the Face of AI: Examining Human Judgment Against Text Labeled as AI Generated [48.70176791365903]
  This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content.<n>We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• Exploration with Principles for Diverse AI Supervision [88.61687950039662]
  Training large transformers using next-token prediction has given rise to groundbreaking advancements in AI. While this generative AI approach has produced impressive results, it heavily leans on human supervision. This strong reliance on human oversight poses a significant hurdle to the advancement of AI innovation. We propose a novel paradigm termed Exploratory AI (EAI) aimed at autonomously generating high-quality training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:03:39Z)
• Human-AI Interactions and Societal Pitfalls [3.4471935446780355]
  When working with generative artificial intelligence (AI), users may see productivity gains, but the AI-generated content may not match their preferences exactly.<n>We show that the interplay between individual-level decisions and AI training may lead to societal challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T09:09:59Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.