ITIScore: An Image-to-Text-to-Image Rating Framework for the Image Captioning Ability of MLLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03765v2
• Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:40:33 GMT
• Title: ITIScore: An Image-to-Text-to-Image Rating Framework for the Image Captioning Ability of MLLMs
• Abstract summary: ICBench is a large-scale image captioning benchmark that covers 12 content categories and consists of both short and long captions on 2K images.<n>We conduct extensive human subjective studies to obtain mean opinion scores (MOSs) across fine-grained evaluation dimensions.<n>We propose an automated evaluation metric, textbfITIScore, based on an image-to-text-to-image framework, which measures caption quality through reconstruction consistency.
• Score: 84.09282931360089
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have greatly improved image understanding and captioning capabilities. However, existing image captioning benchmarks typically suffer from limited diversity in caption length, the absence of recent advanced MLLMs, and insufficient human annotations, which potentially introduces bias and limits the ability to comprehensively assess the performance of modern MLLMs. To address these limitations, we present a new large-scale image captioning benchmark, termed, ICBench, which covers 12 content categories and consists of both short and long captions generated by 10 advanced MLLMs on 2K images, resulting in 40K captions in total. We conduct extensive human subjective studies to obtain mean opinion scores (MOSs) across fine-grained evaluation dimensions, where short captions are assessed in terms of fluency, relevance, and conciseness, while long captions are evaluated based on fluency, relevance, and completeness. Furthermore, we propose an automated evaluation metric, \textbf{ITIScore}, based on an image-to-text-to-image framework, which measures caption quality through reconstruction consistency. Experimental results demonstrate strong alignment between our automatic metric and human judgments, as well as robust zero-shot generalization ability on other public captioning datasets. Both the dataset and model will be released upon publication.

Related papers

• IF-VidCap: Can Video Caption Models Follow Instructions? [44.2412700621584]
  We introduce IF-VidCap, a new benchmark for evaluating controllable video captioning.<n>IF-VidCap incorporates a systematic framework that assesses captions on two dimensions: format correctness and content correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T15:25:08Z)
• VELA: An LLM-Hybrid-as-a-Judge Approach for Evaluating Long Image Captions [3.8028282626618526]
  VELA is an automatic evaluation metric for long captions developed within a novel LLM-Hybrid-as-a-Judge framework.<n>LongCap-Arena is a benchmark specifically designed for evaluating metrics for long captions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T05:52:34Z)
• Image Captioning Evaluation in the Age of Multimodal LLMs: Challenges and Future Perspectives [37.02849705736749]
  The evaluation of machine-generated image captions is a complex and evolving challenge.<n>With the advent of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), image captioning has become a core task.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive overview of advancements in image captioning evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T18:03:56Z)
• Painting with Words: Elevating Detailed Image Captioning with Benchmark and Alignment Learning [56.31096024472269]
  We introduce DeCapBench along with a novel metric, DCScore, specifically designed for detailed captioning tasks.<n>DCScore evaluates hallucinations and fine-grained comprehensiveness by deconstructing responses into the smallest self-sufficient units.<n>DeCapBench exhibits a high correlation with VLM arena results on descriptive tasks, surpassing existing benchmarks for vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T22:53:56Z)
• CAPability: A Comprehensive Visual Caption Benchmark for Evaluating Both Correctness and Thoroughness [30.44039177018447]
  CAPability is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating visual captioning across 12 dimensions spanning six critical views.<n>We curate nearly 11K human-annotated images and videos with visual element annotations to evaluate the generated captions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T07:55:51Z)
• Toward Robust Hyper-Detailed Image Captioning: A Multiagent Approach and Dual Evaluation Metrics for Factuality and Coverage [50.84150600032693]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) excel at generating highly detailed captions but often produce hallucinations.<n>We propose a multiagent approach that leverages LLM-MLLM collaboration to correct given captions.<n>Our proposed method significantly enhances the factual accuracy of captions, even improving those generated by GPT-4V.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T01:37:22Z)
• Transparent Human Evaluation for Image Captioning [70.03979566548823]
  We develop a rubric-based human evaluation protocol for image captioning models. We show that human-generated captions show substantially higher quality than machine-generated ones. We hope that this work will promote a more transparent evaluation protocol for image captioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-17T07:09:59Z)
• Intrinsic Image Captioning Evaluation [53.51379676690971]
  We propose a learning based metrics for image captioning, which we call Intrinsic Image Captioning Evaluation(I2CE) Experiment results show that our proposed method can keep robust performance and give more flexible scores to candidate captions when encountered with semantic similar expression or less aligned semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T08:36:05Z)
• Egoshots, an ego-vision life-logging dataset and semantic fidelity metric to evaluate diversity in image captioning models [63.11766263832545]
  We present a new image captioning dataset, Egoshots, consisting of 978 real life images with no captions. In order to evaluate the quality of the generated captions, we propose a new image captioning metric, object based Semantic Fidelity (SF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T04:43:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.