Artificial Intelligence and Cost Reduction in Public Higher Education: A Scoping Review of Emerging Evidence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04741v1
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 15:07:54 GMT
- Title: Artificial Intelligence and Cost Reduction in Public Higher Education: A Scoping Review of Emerging Evidence
- Abstract summary: This study conducts a scoping review of the literature on AI applications in public higher education.<n>The findings show that AI enables cost savings by automating administrative tasks, optimizing resource allocation, and applying predictive analytics to improve student retention and institutional planning.<n>At the same time, concerns emerge regarding implementation costs, unequal access across institutions, and risks of widening digital divides.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Public higher education systems face increasing financial pressures from expanding student populations, rising operational costs, and persistent demands for equitable access. Artificial Intelligence (AI), including generative tools such as ChatGPT, learning analytics, intelligent tutoring systems, and predictive models, has been proposed as a means of enhancing efficiency and reducing costs. This study conducts a scoping review of the literature on AI applications in public higher education, based on systematic searches in Scopus and IEEE Xplore that identified 241 records, of which 21 empirical studies met predefined eligibility criteria and were thematically analyzed. The findings show that AI enables cost savings by automating administrative tasks, optimizing resource allocation, supporting personalized learning at scale, and applying predictive analytics to improve student retention and institutional planning. At the same time, concerns emerge regarding implementation costs, unequal access across institutions, and risks of widening digital divides. Overall, the thematic analysis highlights both the promises and limitations of AI-driven cost reduction in higher education, offering insights for policymakers, university administrators, and educators on the economic implications of AI adoption, while also pointing to gaps that warrant further empirical research.
Related papers
- A Systematic AI Adoption Framework for Higher Education: From Student GenAI Usage to Institutional Integration [4.908297240926983]
This study investigates how students utilize generative artificial intelligence tools in computer science-oriented disciplines.<n>It develops a structured, lightweight framework supporting institutional adaptation to pervasive GenAI usage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-23T19:46:15Z) - Remote Labor Index: Measuring AI Automation of Remote Work [46.53553410123801]
AIs have made rapid progress on research-oriented benchmarks of knowledge and reasoning, but it remains unclear how these gains translate into economic value and automation.<n>To measure this, we introduce the Remote Labor Index (RLI), a broadly multi-sector benchmark comprising real-world, economically valuable projects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-30T17:58:04Z) - Integration of AI in STEM Education, Addressing Ethical Challenges in K-12 Settings [0.0]
The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence into K-12 STEM education presents transformative opportunities alongside significant ethical challenges.<n>This paper examines the dual-edged impact of AI in STEM classrooms, analyzing its benefits (e.g., adaptive learning, real-time feedback) and drawbacks (e.g., surveillance risks, pedagogical limitations) through an ethical lens.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-22T03:07:26Z) - Adapting University Policies for Generative AI: Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Solutions in Higher Education [1.2691047660244332]
The rapid proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools has ushered in a transformative era in higher education.<n>This article critically examines the opportunities offered by generative AI, explores the multifaceted challenges it poses, and outlines robust policy solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-27T13:49:02Z) - The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z) - Edge-Cloud Collaborative Computing on Distributed Intelligence and Model Optimization: A Survey [58.50944604905037]
Edge-cloud collaborative computing (ECCC) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm for addressing the computational demands of modern intelligent applications.<n>Recent advancements in AI, particularly deep learning and large language models (LLMs), have dramatically enhanced the capabilities of these distributed systems.<n>This survey provides a structured tutorial on fundamental architectures, enabling technologies, and emerging applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-03T13:55:38Z) - To Deepfake or Not to Deepfake: Higher Education Stakeholders' Perceptions and Intentions towards Synthetic Media [0.0]
Deepfake technologies use generative artificial intelligence to mimic a person's likeness or voice.<n>This study investigated stakeholder perceptions and intentions regarding deepfakes in higher education.<n>We found that academic stakeholders demonstrated a relatively low intention to adopt these technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T10:32:19Z) - Integrating Generative AI in Cybersecurity Education: Case Study Insights on Pedagogical Strategies, Critical Thinking, and Responsible AI Use [0.0]
This study presents a structured framework for integrating GenAI tools into cybersecurity education.<n>The implementation strategy followed a two-stage approach, embedding GenAI within tutorial exercises and assessment tasks.<n>Findings indicate that AI-assisted learning significantly enhanced students' ability to evaluate security policies, refine risk assessments, and bridge theoretical knowledge with practical application.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-21T10:14:07Z) - Analyzing the Impact of AI Tools on Student Study Habits and Academic Performance [0.0]
The research focuses on how AI tools can support personalized learning, adaptive test adjustments, and provide real-time classroom analysis.<n>Student feedback revealed strong support for these features, and the study found a significant reduction in study hours alongside an increase in GPA.<n>Despite these benefits, challenges such as over-reliance on AI and difficulties in integrating AI with traditional teaching methods were also identified.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-03T04:51:57Z) - Harnessing AI for efficient analysis of complex policy documents: a case study of Executive Order 14110 [44.99833362998488]
Policy documents, such as legislation, regulations, and executive orders, are crucial in shaping society.
This study aims to evaluate the potential of AI in streamlining policy analysis and to identify the strengths and limitations of current AI approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T11:19:28Z) - Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0: A Review of Integration Challenges for Industrial Systems [45.31340537171788]
Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) generate vast data sets that can be leveraged by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for applications including predictive maintenance and production planning.<n>Despite the demonstrated potential of AI, its widespread adoption in sectors like manufacturing remains limited.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T20:54:41Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.