Tight Quantum Lower Bound for k-Distinctness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05133v1
• Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 19:52:58 GMT
• Title: Tight Quantum Lower Bound for k-Distinctness
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new quantum query lower bound framework.<n>We show how this framework behaves on the problem of finding equal elements in the input string.<n>In particular, we demonstrate its power by proving a first tight quantum query lower bound for the k-Distinctness problem.
• Score: 52.10197476419622
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a new quantum query lower bound framework. It is inspired by Zhandry's compressed oracle technique, but it also subsumes the polynomial method as a special case. Compared to Zhandry's technique, our approach has two key differences. First, we do not use any oracles (except for the standard input oracle), and define ``knowledge'' directly through the expansion of the state of the algorithm in the Fourier basis. Second, we allow arbitrary probability distributions of inputs. We show how this framework behaves on the problem of finding equal elements in the input string. In particular, we demonstrate its power by proving a first tight quantum query lower bound for the k-Distinctness problem.

Related papers

• Verifiable quantum advantage in extremely low depth [52.51019642214249]
  We give a problem that is solvable by shallow quantum circuits, hard for computation in time under lattice-based assumptions.<n>We prove that shallow quantum circuits have sufficient structure to solve certain classically hard tasks whose solutions can be verified efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T15:54:34Z)
• Compressed Permutation Oracles [0.6768558752130311]
  We develop and prove soundness of a compressed permutation oracle.<n>We re-prove essentially all known quantum query lower bounds in the random permutation model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T03:13:48Z)
• Succinct quantum testers for closeness and $k$-wise uniformity of probability distributions [2.3466828785520373]
  We explore potential quantum speedups for the fundamental problem of testing the properties of closeness and $k$-wise uniformity of probability distributions. We show that the quantum query complexities for $ell1$- and $ell2$-closeness testing are $O(sqrtn/varepsilon)$ and $O(sqrtnk/varepsilon)$. We propose the first quantum algorithm for this problem with query complexity $O(sqrtnk/varepsilon)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T15:32:37Z)
• Approximate degree lower bounds for oracle identification problems [19.001036556917818]
  We introduce a framework for proving approximate degree lower bounds for certain oracle identification problems. Our lower bounds are driven by randomized communication upper bounds for the greater-than and equality functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T14:30:28Z)
• One-Way Ticket to Las Vegas and the Quantum Adversary [78.33558762484924]
  We show that quantum Las Vegas query complexity is exactly equal to the quantum adversary bound. This is achieved by transforming a feasible solution to the adversary inversion problem into a quantum query algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T11:05:22Z)
• Quantum Worst-Case to Average-Case Reductions for All Linear Problems [66.65497337069792]
  We study the problem of designing worst-case to average-case reductions for quantum algorithms. We provide an explicit and efficient transformation of quantum algorithms that are only correct on a small fraction of their inputs into ones that are correct on all inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T22:01:49Z)
• The NISQ Complexity of Collision Finding [2.9405711598281536]
  A fundamental primitive in modern cryptography, collision-resistant hashing ensures there is no efficient way to find inputs that produce the same hash value. Quantum adversaries now require full-scale computers equipped with the power of NISQ. In this paper, we investigate three different models for NISQ algorithms achieve tight bounds for all of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T13:55:28Z)
• Quantum Depth in the Random Oracle Model [57.663890114335736]
  We give a comprehensive characterization of the computational power of shallow quantum circuits combined with classical computation. For some problems, the ability to perform adaptive measurements in a single shallow quantum circuit is more useful than the ability to perform many shallow quantum circuits without adaptive measurements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T17:54:02Z)
• Complexity-Theoretic Limitations on Quantum Algorithms for Topological Data Analysis [59.545114016224254]
  Quantum algorithms for topological data analysis seem to provide an exponential advantage over the best classical approach. We show that the central task of TDA -- estimating Betti numbers -- is intractable even for quantum computers. We argue that an exponential quantum advantage can be recovered if the input data is given as a specification of simplices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-28T17:53:25Z)
• Entanglement and coherence in Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm [58.720142291102135]
  Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm allows one to determine a bit string encoded into an oracle. We analyze in detail the quantum resources in the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm. We show that in the absence of entanglement, the performance of the algorithm is directly related to the amount of quantum coherence in the initial state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T20:32:36Z)
• On the Compressed-Oracle Technique, and Post-Quantum Security of Proofs of Sequential Work [10.43571631715192]
  We revisit the so-called compressed oracle technique, introduced by Zhandry for analyzing quantum algorithms in the quantum random oracle model (QROM) Our main technical contribution is a framework that simplifies the use of the parallel-query generalization of the compressed oracle technique for proving query complexity results. As a concrete cryptographic application of our techniques, we prove that the "Simple Proofs of Sequential Work" proposed by Cohen and Pietrzak remains secure against quantum attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T12:44:08Z)
• Simpler Proofs of Quantumness [16.12500804569801]
  A proof of quantumness is a method for provably demonstrating that a quantum device can perform computational tasks that a classical device cannot. There are currently three approaches for exhibiting proofs of quantumness. We give a two-message (challenge-response) proof of quantumness based on any trapdoor claw-free function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-11T01:31:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.