Pre-Execution Safety Gate & Task Safety Contracts for LLM-Controlled Robot Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05427v1
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 04:46:06 GMT
- Title: Pre-Execution Safety Gate & Task Safety Contracts for LLM-Controlled Robot Systems
- Abstract summary: We introduce SafeGate, a neurosymbolic safety architecture that prevents unsafe natural language task commands from reaching robot execution.<n>In addition, we introduce Task Safety Contracts, which decomposes commands that pass through the gate into invariants, guards, and abort conditions.<n>Results show that SafeGate significantly reduces the acceptance of defective commands while maintaining a high acceptance of benign tasks.
- Score: 14.419994656981002
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to convert task commands into robot-executable code, however this pipeline lacks validation gates to detect unsafe and defective commands before they are translated into robot code. Furthermore, even commands that appear safe at the outset can produce unsafe state transitions during execution in the absence of continuous constraint monitoring. In this research, we introduce SafeGate, a neurosymbolic safety architecture that prevents unsafe natural language task commands from reaching robot execution. Drawing from ISO 13482 safety standard, SafeGate extracts structured safety-relevant properties from natural language commands and applies a deterministic decision gate to authorize or reject execution. In addition, we introduce Task Safety Contracts, which decomposes commands that pass through the gate into invariants, guards, and abort conditions to prevent unsafe state transitions during execution. We further incorporate Z3 SMT solving to enforce constraint checking derived from the Task Safety Contracts. We evaluate SafeGate against existing LLM-based robot safety frameworks and baseline LLMs across 230 benchmark tasks, 30 AI2-THOR simulation scenarios, and real-world robot experiments. Results show that SafeGate significantly reduces the acceptance of defective commands while maintaining a high acceptance of benign tasks, demonstrating the importance of pre-execution safety gates for LLM-controlled robot systems
Related papers
- AgentLens: Interpretable Safety Steering via Mechanistic Subspaces for Multi-Turn Coding Agent [53.82005364479556]
Coding agents based on large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable autonomous capabilities.<n>Existing safety mechanisms mainly rely on external guardrails.<n>We propose AgentLens, a white-box defense framework that performs runtime safety detection and representation-level mitigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-21T21:13:55Z) - OSGuard: A Benchmark for Safety in Computer-Use Agents [12.395093977641581]
OSGuard is a benchmark suite for evaluating safety in computer-use agents under benign, unchanged user instructions.<n> OSGuard contains an action-level benchmark for local guardrail decisions and a risk-augmented execution suite for end-to-end evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-13T00:32:24Z) - SeClaw: Spec-Driven Security Task Synthesis for Evaluating Autonomous Agents [87.26967184869198]
SeClaw is a framework that combines specification-driven security task synthesis with execution-based security evaluation for Autonomous agents.<n> benchmark covers risks arising from resources, user tasks, environments, and intrinsic agent behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-01T14:23:42Z) - Position: AI Safety Requires Effective Controllability [7.789894640525689]
We argue that AI safety requires controllability as a first-class objective.<n>Experiments with OpenClaw-based agents show that current alignment and guardrail mechanisms reduce risk, but often fail to provide persistent, authoritative, and enforceable runtime control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T14:53:24Z) - SafeManip: A Property-Driven Benchmark for Temporal Safety Evaluation in Robotic Manipulation [30.582295885898997]
We introduce SafeManip, a property-driven benchmark to explicitly evaluate temporal safety properties in robotic manipulation.<n>SafeManip defines reusable safety templates over finite executions using Linear Temporal Logic over finite traces (LTLf)<n>We evaluate SafeManip on six vision-language-action policies, including $_0.5$, GR00T, and their training variants, across 50 RoboCasa365 household tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T16:49:28Z) - RoboSafe: Safeguarding Embodied Agents via Executable Safety Logic [56.38397499463889]
Embodied agents powered by vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly capable of executing complex real-world tasks.<n>However, they remain vulnerable to hazardous instructions that may trigger unsafe behaviors.<n>We propose RoboSafe, a runtime safeguard for embodied agents through executable predicate-based safety logic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-24T15:01:26Z) - AGENTSAFE: Benchmarking the Safety of Embodied Agents on Hazardous Instructions [64.85086226439954]
We present SAFE, a benchmark for assessing the safety of embodied VLM agents on hazardous instructions.<n> SAFE comprises three components: SAFE-THOR, SAFE-VERSE, and SAFE-DIAGNOSE.<n>We uncover systematic failures in translating hazard recognition into safe planning and execution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-17T16:37:35Z) - Safety Aware Task Planning via Large Language Models in Robotics [22.72668275829238]
This paper introduces SAFER (Safety-Aware Framework for Execution in Robotics), a multi-LLM framework designed to embed safety awareness into robotic task planning.<n>Our framework integrates safety feedback at multiple stages of execution, enabling real-time risk assessment, proactive error correction, and transparent safety evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-19T21:41:10Z) - Safety Guardrails for LLM-Enabled Robots [82.0459036717193]
Traditional robot safety approaches do not address the novel vulnerabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose RoboGuard, a two-stage guardrail architecture to ensure the safety of LLM-enabled robots.<n>We show that RoboGuard reduces the execution of unsafe plans from 92% to below 2.5% without compromising performance on safe plans.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-10T22:01:56Z) - SCANS: Mitigating the Exaggerated Safety for LLMs via Safety-Conscious Activation Steering [56.92068213969036]
Safety alignment is indispensable for Large Language Models (LLMs) to defend threats from malicious instructions.<n>Recent researches reveal safety-aligned LLMs prone to reject benign queries due to the exaggerated safety issue.<n>We propose a Safety-Conscious Activation Steering (SCANS) method to mitigate the exaggerated safety concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-21T10:01:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.