FinReporting: An Agentic Workflow for Localized Reporting of Cross-Jurisdiction Financial Disclosures

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05966v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 15:00:01 GMT
• Title: FinReporting: An Agentic Workflow for Localized Reporting of Cross-Jurisdiction Financial Disclosures
• Abstract summary: We present FinReporting, an agentic workflow for localized cross-jurisdiction financial reporting.<n>The system builds a unified canonical ontology over Income Statement, Balance Sheet, and Cash Flow.<n>It decomposes reporting into auditable stages including filing acquisition, extraction, canonical mapping, and anomaly logging.
• Score: 39.77510496944984
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Financial reporting systems increasingly use large language models (LLMs) to extract and summarize corporate disclosures. However, most assume a single-market setting and do not address structural differences across jurisdictions. Variations in accounting taxonomies, tagging infrastructures (e.g., XBRL vs. PDF), and aggregation conventions make cross-jurisdiction reporting a semantic alignment and verification challenge. We present FinReporting, an agentic workflow for localized cross-jurisdiction financial reporting. The system builds a unified canonical ontology over Income Statement, Balance Sheet, and Cash Flow, and decomposes reporting into auditable stages including filing acquisition, extraction, canonical mapping, and anomaly logging. Rather than using LLMs as free-form generators, FinReporting deploys them as constrained verifiers under explicit decision rules and evidence grounding. Evaluated on annual filings from the US, Japan, and China, the system improves consistency and reliability under heterogeneous reporting regimes. We release an interactive demo supporting cross-market inspection and structured export of localized financial statements. Our demo is available at https://huggingface.co/spaces/BoomQ/FinReporting-Demo . The video describing our system is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f65jdEL31Kk

Related papers

• AUDITFLOW: Executable Symbolic Environments for Structured Financial Reporting Verification [19.94244675257689]
  AuditFlow is a graph-grounded multi-agent framework that separates adaptive search from verification.<n>Two junior auditors inspect each case from regulatory and evidentiary views, while a senior auditor resolves disagreements and can request further investigation.<n>Final reports are fused through evidential aggregation to produce an audit verdict, expected value, evidence trail, and score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T02:14:42Z)
• The Alpha Illusion: Reported Alpha from LLM Trading Agents Should Not Be Treated as Deployment Evidence [23.772113719172896]
  Report headline Sharpe ratios from end-to-end LLM trading agents should not be treated as deployment evidence.<n>Report robustness is not tradable probability, narrative reasoning is not numerical execution, and model priors may become undisclosed implicit factor exposures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-16T09:14:35Z)
• IMMACULATE: A Practical LLM Auditing Framework via Verifiable Computation [49.796717294455796]
  We present IMMACULATE, a practical auditing framework that detects economically motivated deviations.<n>IMMACULATE selectively audits a small fraction of requests using verifiable computation, achieving strong detection guarantees while amortizing cryptographic overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T07:21:02Z)
• Evaluating LLMs in Finance Requires Explicit Bias Consideration [88.38155218924999]
  Finance-specific biases can inflate performance, contaminate backtests, and make reported results useless for deployment claims.<n>No single bias is discussed in more than 28 percent of studies.<n>We propose a Structural Validity Framework and an evaluation checklist with minimal requirements for bias diagnosis and future system design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T17:02:01Z)
• Audit Trails for Accountability in Large Language Models [3.750249890675081]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in consequential decisions across healthcare, finance, employment, and public services.<n>We propose audit trails as a sociotechnical mechanism for continuous accountability.<n>An audit trail is a chronological, tamper-evident, context-rich ledger of lifecycle events and decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T16:04:33Z)
• All That Glisters Is Not Gold: A Benchmark for Reference-Free Counterfactual Financial Misinformation Detection [67.89888669159899]
  RFC Bench is a benchmark for evaluating large language models on financial misinformation under realistic news.<n>The benchmark defines two complementary tasks: reference free misinformation detection and comparison based diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T18:18:28Z)
• Auditing Pay-Per-Token in Large Language Models [11.795056270534287]
  We develop an auditing framework based on martingale theory to detect token misreporting.<n>Our framework is guaranteed to always detect token misreporting, regardless of the provider's (mis-)reporting policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T17:47:16Z)
• Fin-ExBERT: User Intent based Text Extraction in Financial Context using Graph-Augmented BERT and trainable Plugin [0.0]
  Fin-ExBERT is a lightweight framework for extracting user intent-relevant sentences from annotated financial service calls.<n>We show strong precision and F1 performance on real-world transcripts, with interpretable output suitable for downstream auditing and question-answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T11:20:07Z)
• FinTagging: Benchmarking LLMs for Extracting and Structuring Financial Information [47.37027539828975]
  FinTagging is the first comprehensive benchmark for structure-aware and full-scope.<n>tagging.<n> FinNI for numeric identification extracts numerical entities and their types from.<n>financial reports.<n>FinCL for concept linking maps each extracted entity to the corresponding concept in the full U.S. taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T02:55:53Z)
• Are You Getting What You Pay For? Auditing Model Substitution in LLM APIs [71.7892165868749]
  Commercial Large Language Model (LLM) APIs create a fundamental trust problem.<n>Users pay for specific models but have no guarantee that providers deliver them faithfully.<n>We formalize this model substitution problem and evaluate detection methods under realistic adversarial conditions.<n>We propose and evaluate the use of Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) as one practical and robust solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:57:41Z)
• Advancing Anomaly Detection: Non-Semantic Financial Data Encoding with LLMs [49.57641083688934]
  We introduce a novel approach to anomaly detection in financial data using Large Language Models (LLMs) embeddings. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs contribute valuable information to anomaly detection as our models outperform the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T20:19:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.