Epistemic Blinding: An Inference-Time Protocol for Auditing Prior Contamination in LLM-Assisted Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06013v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 16:06:52 GMT
• Title: Epistemic Blinding: An Inference-Time Protocol for Auditing Prior Contamination in LLM-Assisted Analysis
• Abstract summary: Epistemic blinding is a simple inference-time protocol that replaces entity identifiers with anonymous codes before prompting, then compares outputs against an unblinded control.<n>In oncology drug target prioritization across four cancer types, blinding changes 16% of top-20 predictions while preserving identical recovery of validated targets.<n>In S&P 500 equity screening, brand-recognition bias reshapes 30-40% of top-20 rankings across five random seeds.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents epistemic blinding in the context of an agentic system that uses large language models to reason across multiple biological datasets for drug target prioritization. During development, it became apparent that LLM outputs silently blend data-driven inference with memorized priors about named entities - and the blend is invisible: there is no way to determine, from a single output, how much came from the data on the page and how much came from the model's training memory. Epistemic blinding is a simple inference-time protocol that replaces entity identifiers with anonymous codes before prompting, then compares outputs against an unblinded control. The protocol does not make LLM reasoning deterministic, but it restores one critical axis of auditability: measuring how much of an output came from the supplied data versus the model's parametric knowledge. The complete target identification system is described - including LLM-guided evolutionary optimization of scoring functions and blinded agentic reasoning for target rationalization - with demonstration that both stages operate without access to entity identity. In oncology drug target prioritization across four cancer types, blinding changes 16% of top-20 predictions while preserving identical recovery of validated targets. The contamination problem is shown to generalize beyond biology: in S&P 500 equity screening, brand-recognition bias reshapes 30-40% of top-20 rankings across five random seeds. To lower the barrier to adoption, the protocol is released as an open-source tool and as a Claude Code skill that enables one-command epistemic blinding within agentic workflows. The claim is not that blinded analysis produces better results, but that without blinding, there is no way to know to what degree the agent is adhering to the analytical process the researcher designed.

Related papers

• Zero-Shot Active Feature Acquisition via LLM-Elicitation [33.792645413345845]
  Large language models (LLMs) supply unsupervised domain knowledge, but are poor sequential planners.<n>We develop a framework for zero-shot AFA through disciplined elicitation.<n>We apply our framework to two settings: binary classification and top-$k$ identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T11:15:38Z)
• Deterministic Integrity Gates for LLM-Assisted Clinical Manuscript Preparation: An Auditable Biomedical Informatics Architecture [0.3823356975862005]
  We describe an architecture pairing generation with verification, resting on three principles.<n>This determinism-where-possible split, organized as an integrity-gate taxonomy, is the core contribution.<n> MedSci Skills is an open-source toolkit of 43 skills with a 21-detector deterministic tier, evaluated on three public-dataset pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T13:51:04Z)
• From Residuals to Reasons: LLM-Guided Mechanism Inference from Tabular Data [10.795877029195845]
  A persistent challenge in machine learning for scientific applications is jointly achieving prediction and understanding.<n>We introduce Multi-Agent Residual In-Context Learning (MARICL)<n>MARICL improves consistently over its base model on all datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T15:34:08Z)
• LC-ERD: Mining Latent Logic for Self-Evolving Reasoning via Consistency-Regulated Reward Decomposition [55.572260012037084]
  We introduce LC-ERD (Logic-Consistent Endogenous Reward Decomposition), a framework framing self-alignment as latent structure mining.<n>We derive a Variational Logic Potential by aggregating consensus from the model's Latent Logic Expertise.<n>Experiments show LC-ERD delivers a robust self-evolution path, uncovering trade-offs between logic consistency and accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T07:27:50Z)
• ProtoMedAgent: Multimodal Clinical Interpretability via Privacy-Aware Agentic Workflows [7.27267618572654]
  ProtoMedAgent formalizes multimodal clinical reporting as an iterative, zero-gradient test-time optimization problem.<n>Online generation is strictly constrained by exact set-theoretic differentials and a reflective Scribe-Critic loop.<n>ProtoMedAgent achieves 91.2% Comparison Set Faithfulness where it fundamentally outperforms standard RAG (46.2%)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T20:57:37Z)
• Eliciting Medical Reasoning with Knowledge-enhanced Data Synthesis: A Semi-Supervised Reinforcement Learning Approach [62.0906177191353]
  Existing approaches distill chain-of-thought reasoning traces from large proprietary models via supervised fine-tuning, then conduct reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose MedSSR, a Medical Knowledge-enhanced data Synthesis and Semi-supervised Reinforcement learning framework.<n>Our framework first employs rare disease knowledge to synthesize distribution-controllable reasoning questions.<n>We then utilize the policy model itself to generate high-quality pseudo-labels. This enables a two-stage, intrinsic-to-extrinsic training paradigm: self-supervised RL on the pseudo-labeled data, followed by supervised RL on the human-annotated real data
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T14:37:38Z)
• Agentic Cognitive Profiling: Realigning Automated Alzheimer's Disease Detection with Clinical Construct Validity [66.94391219005291]
  This paper proposes Agentic Cognitive Profiling (ACP), an agentic framework that realigns automated screening with clinical protocol logic.<n>Central to our design is decoupling semantic understanding from measurement by delegating all quantification to deterministic function calling.<n>ACP achieves 90.5% score match rate in task examination and 85.3% accuracy in AD prediction, surpassing popular baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T06:15:35Z)
• Predicting LLM Correctness in Prosthodontics Using Metadata and Hallucination Signals [4.680384065487852]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and medical education.<n>This study investigates the feasibility of predicting correctness by analyzing a general-purpose model (GPT-4o) and a reasoning-centric model (OSS-120B) on a multiple-choice prosthodontics exam.<n>Our findings demonstrate that this metadata-based approach can improve accuracy by up to +7.14% and achieve a precision of 83.12% over a baseline that assumes all answers are correct.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-27T07:51:50Z)
• Reasoning with Confidence: Efficient Verification of LLM Reasoning Steps via Uncertainty Heads [104.9566359759396]
  We propose a lightweight alternative for step-level reasoning verification based on data-driven uncertainty scores.<n>Our findings suggest that the internal states of LLMs encode their uncertainty and can serve as reliable signals for reasoning verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-09T03:38:29Z)
• Where Did It Go Wrong? Attributing Undesirable LLM Behaviors via Representation Gradient Tracing [12.835224376066769]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, yet their deployment is frequently undermined by undesirable behaviors.<n>We introduce a novel and efficient framework that diagnoses a range of undesirable LLM behaviors by analyzing representation and its gradients.<n>We systematically evaluate our method for tasks that include tracking harmful content, detecting backdoor poisoning, and identifying knowledge contamination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T12:07:47Z)
• LLM Agent Swarm for Hypothesis-Driven Drug Discovery [2.7036595757881323]
  PharmaSwarm is a unified multi-agent framework that orchestrates specialized "agents" to propose, validate, and refine hypotheses for novel drug targets and lead compounds.<n>By acting as an AI copilot, PharmaSwarm can accelerate translational research and deliver high-confidence hypotheses more efficiently than traditional pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T22:27:50Z)
• Correctness Coverage Evaluation for Medical Multiple-Choice Question Answering Based on the Enhanced Conformal Prediction Framework [2.9599960287815144]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in medical question-answering (QA) scenarios.<n>LLMs can generate hallucinations and nonfactual information, undermining their trustworthiness in high-stakes medical tasks.<n>This paper proposes an enhanced Conformal Prediction framework for medical multiple-choice question-answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T15:22:10Z)
• AutoElicit: Using Large Language Models for Expert Prior Elicitation in Predictive Modelling [53.54623137152208]
  We introduce AutoElicit to extract knowledge from large language models and construct priors for predictive models.<n>We show these priors are informative and can be refined using natural language.<n>We find that AutoElicit yields priors that can substantially reduce error over uninformative priors, using fewer labels, and consistently outperform in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T10:13:39Z)
• A New Benchmark and Reverse Validation Method for Passage-level Hallucination Detection [63.56136319976554]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) generate hallucinations, which can cause significant damage when deployed for mission-critical tasks. We propose a self-check approach based on reverse validation to detect factual errors automatically in a zero-resource fashion. We empirically evaluate our method and existing zero-resource detection methods on two datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:14:59Z)
• PRISM: Mitigating EHR Data Sparsity via Learning from Missing Feature Calibrated Prototype Patient Representations [7.075420686441701]
  PRISM is a framework that indirectly imputes data by leveraging prototype representations of similar patients.<n> PRISM also includes a feature confidence module, which evaluates the reliability of each feature considering missing statuses.<n>Our experiments on the MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, PhysioNet Challenge 2012, eICU datasets demonstrate PRISM's superior performance in predicting in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T07:01:38Z)
• Learning versus Refutation in Noninteractive Local Differential Privacy [133.80204506727526]
  We study two basic statistical tasks in non-interactive local differential privacy (LDP): learning and refutation. Our main result is a complete characterization of the sample complexity of PAC learning for non-interactive LDP protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T03:19:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.