From Hallucination to Structure Snowballing: The Alignment Tax of Constrained Decoding in LLM Reflection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06066v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 16:47:37 GMT
• Title: From Hallucination to Structure Snowballing: The Alignment Tax of Constrained Decoding in LLM Reflection
• Abstract summary: Intrinsic self-correction in Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently fails in open-ended reasoning tasks due to hallucination snowballing''<n>This study investigates whether enforcing structured reflection purely through constrained decoding can disrupt error propagation without additional training.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Intrinsic self-correction in Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently fails in open-ended reasoning tasks due to ``hallucination snowballing,'' a phenomenon in which models recursively justify early errors during free-text reflection. While structured feedback can mitigate this issue, existing approaches often rely on externally trained critics or symbolic tools, reducing agent autonomy. This study investigates whether enforcing structured reflection purely through Outlines-based constrained decoding can disrupt error propagation without additional training. Evaluating an 8-billion-parameter model (Qwen3-8B), we show that simply imposing structural constraints does not improve self-correction performance. Instead, it triggers a new failure mode termed ``structure snowballing.'' We find that the cognitive load required to satisfy strict formatting rules pushes the model into formatting traps. This observation helps explain why the agent achieves near-perfect superficial syntactic alignment yet fails to detect or resolve deeper semantic errors. These findings expose an ``alignment tax'' inherent to constrained decoding, highlighting a tension between structural granularity and internal model capacity in autonomous workflows. Code and raw logs are available in the GitHub repository: https://github.com/hongxuzhou/agentic_llm_structured_self_critique.

Related papers

• Interpreting Object-Dependent Concept Brittleness in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [105.53190946111586]
  We term this phenomenon object-dependent concept brittleness.<n>We present an interpretability-oriented framework to audit and minimally correct these failures.<n>We evaluate the proposed framework on style and attribute failure cases across multiple diffusion backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T09:07:40Z)
• Weave of Formal Thought [51.56484100374058]
  We introduce Weave of Formal Thought (WoFT), a paradigm uniting rigorous syntactic validation with learned structural representations.<n>We present a latent-variable fine-tuning method training the language model to interleave non-terminal grammar symbols directly into generation.<n>For Python, fine-tuning StarCoder2-3B with our RWS objective reduces per-token cross-entropy by 14.3% relative to a text-only SFT baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-24T15:58:11Z)
• Empirical Study for Structured Output Control in LLMs for Software Engineering [13.096361151631427]
  A semantically correct output that violates the expected format is, from the consuming system's perspective, indistinguishable from a wrong answer.<n>We present a systematic evaluation of structural reliability across four representative SE tasks.<n>We highlight the need for approaches that jointly ensure structural fidelity and semantic correctness in LLM-driven errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T12:13:58Z)
• CellScientist: Dual-Space Hierarchical Orchestration for Closed-Loop Refinement of Virtual Cell Models [62.281480231694]
  Virtual Cell Modeling (VCM) requires models that not only predict perturbation responses, but also support targeted revision when predictions fail.<n>Current LLM-assisted modeling face a refinement-routing problem: prediction discrepancies are observed through executable implementations.<n>We propose CellScientist, a dual-space hierarchical framework that couples a high-level hypothesis space with a low-level executable implementation space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T06:40:24Z)
• How LLMs Fail and Generalize in RTL Coding for Hardware Design? [56.361436215029045]
  We introduce a new error taxonomy grounded in problem solvability, inspired by cognitive theory.<n>Our taxonomy categorizes failures into syntactic, semantic, solvable functional, and unsolvable functional types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T14:34:49Z)
• Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
  DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z)
• Decoding the Critique Mechanism in Large Reasoning Models [50.821607345799386]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) exhibit backtracking and self-verification mechanisms that enable them to revise intermediate steps and reach correct solutions.<n>We investigate how current LRMs recover from errors by inserting arithmetic mistakes in their intermediate reasoning steps.<n>We find that despite the error propagating through the chain-of-thought, the model still reaches the correct final answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T10:03:30Z)
• Contextual Drag: How Errors in the Context Affect LLM Reasoning [38.35611637575897]
  We study a phenomenon termed contextual drag.<n>The presence of failed attempts in the context biases subsequent generations toward structurally similar errors.<n>We demonstrate that neither external feedback nor successful self-verification suffices to eliminate this effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T07:36:23Z)
• Autoregressive, Yet Revisable: In Decoding Revision for Secure Code Generation [17.125957722393327]
  Stream of Revision is a paradigm shift that elevates code generation from a monotonic stream to a dynamic, self-correcting trajectory.<n>We introduce specific action tokens that enable the model to seamlessly backtrack and edit its own history within a single forward pass.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T12:22:46Z)
• Beyond Output Critique: Self-Correction via Task Distillation [36.44752912823049]
  We propose a framework that introduces an intermediate step of task abstraction before solution refinement.<n>Given an input and an initial response, the model first distills the task into a structured template that captures key variables, constraints, and problem structure.<n>This abstraction then guides solution instantiation, grounding subsequent responses in a clearer understanding of the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T19:15:41Z)
• The Compliance Paradox: Semantic-Instruction Decoupling in Automated Academic Code Evaluation [11.984098021215878]
  We introduce the Semantic-Preserving Adrial Code Injection (SPACI) Framework and the Abstract Syntax Tree-Aware Semantic Injection Protocol (AST-ASIP)<n>These methods exploit the Syntax-Semantics Gap by embedding adversarial directives into syntactically inert regions (trivia nodes) of the Abstract Syntax Tree.<n>Through a large-scale evaluation of 9 SOTA models across 25,000 submissions in Python, C, C++, and Java, we reveal catastrophic failure rates (>95%) in high-capacity open-weights models like DeepSeek-V3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T07:40:58Z)
• CRAFT: Continuous Reasoning and Agentic Feedback Tuning for Multimodal Text-to-Image Generation [0.0]
  CRAFT (Continuous Reasoning and Agentic Feedback Tuning) is a training-free, model-agnostic framework that brings structured reasoning paradigm to multimodal image generation.<n>It consistently improves compositional accuracy, text rendering, and preference-based evaluations.<n>These improvements incur only a negligible inference-time overhead, allowing smaller or cheaper models to approach the quality of substantially more expensive systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T13:44:41Z)
• AdvChain: Adversarial Chain-of-Thought Tuning for Robust Safety Alignment of Large Reasoning Models [62.70575022567081]
  We propose AdvChain, an alignment paradigm that teaches models dynamic self-correction through adversarial CoT tuning.<n>Our work establishes a new direction for building more robust and reliable reasoning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T04:27:23Z)
• Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.