Robustness Risk of Conversational Retrieval: Identifying and Mitigating Noise Sensitivity in Qwen3-Embedding Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06176v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 06:37:23 GMT
• Title: Robustness Risk of Conversational Retrieval: Identifying and Mitigating Noise Sensitivity in Qwen3-Embedding Model
• Abstract summary: Under conversational settings, structured dialogue-style noise can become disproportionately retrievable and intrude into top-ranked results.<n>We show that lightweight query prompting qualitatively alters retrieval behavior, effectively suppressing noise intrusion and restoring ranking stability.
• Score: 27.295457728639402
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present an empirical study of embedding-based retrieval under realistic conversational settings, where queries are short, dialogue-like, and weakly specified, and retrieval corpora contain structured conversational artifacts. Focusing on Qwen3-embedding models, we identify a deployment-relevant robustness vulnerability: under conversational retrieval without query prompting, structured dialogue-style noise can become disproportionately retrievable and intrude into top-ranked results, despite being semantically uninformative. This failure mode emerges consistently across model scales, remains largely invisible under standard clean-query benchmarks, and is significantly more pronounced in Qwen3 than in earlier Qwen variants and other widely used dense retrieval baselines. We further show that lightweight query prompting qualitatively alters retrieval behavior, effectively suppressing noise intrusion and restoring ranking stability. Our findings highlight an underexplored robustness risk in conversational retrieval and underscore the importance of evaluation protocols that reflect the complexities of deployed systems.

Related papers

• Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems [55.04168927059962]
  Reasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that supports downstream reasoning rather than merely matching topical similarity.<n>We introduce BRIGHT-Pro, an expert-annotated benchmark that expands each query with multi-aspect gold evidence.<n>We also construct RTriever- Synth, an aspect-decomposed synthetic corpus that generates complementary positives and positive-conditioned hard negatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T17:42:50Z)
• Stateful Evidence-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Iterative Reasoning [7.701766930531068]
  Stateful Evidence-Driven RAG with Iterative Reasoning is a framework that models question answering as a progressive evidence accumulation process.<n>The framework performs evidence-driven deficiency analysis to identify gaps and conflicts and iteratively refines queries to guide subsequent retrieval.<n> Experiments on multiple question answering benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over standard RAG and multi-step baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T06:57:49Z)
• SQuTR: A Robustness Benchmark for Spoken Query to Text Retrieval under Acoustic Noise [11.887069140065774]
  We present SQuTR, a robustness benchmark for spoken query retrieval.<n>SQuTR aggregates 37,317 unique queries from six commonly used English and Chinese text retrieval datasets.<n>We conduct large-scale evaluations on representative cascaded and end-to-end retrieval systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T10:08:27Z)
• QUARK: Robust Retrieval under Non-Faithful Queries via Query-Anchored Aggregation [2.505352949111876]
  QUARK is a training-free framework for robust retrieval under non-faithful queries.<n>The design enables QUARK to improve recall and ranking quality without sacrificing robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T21:14:49Z)
• Lost in the Noise: How Reasoning Models Fail with Contextual Distractors [57.31788955167306]
  Recent advances in reasoning models and agentic AI systems have led to an increased reliance on diverse external information.<n>We introduce NoisyBench, a comprehensive benchmark that systematically evaluates model robustness across 11 datasets in RAG, reasoning, alignment, and tool-use tasks.<n>Our evaluation reveals a catastrophic performance drop of up to 80% in state-of-the-art models when faced with contextual distractors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T05:43:51Z)
• DeepSynth-Eval: Objectively Evaluating Information Consolidation in Deep Survey Writing [53.85037373860246]
  We introduce Deep Synth-Eval, a benchmark designed to objectively evaluate information consolidation capabilities.<n>We propose a fine-grained evaluation protocol using General Checklists (for factual coverage) and Constraint Checklists (for structural organization)<n>Our results demonstrate that agentic plan-and-write significantly outperform single-turn generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T03:07:52Z)
• SVeritas: Benchmark for Robust Speaker Verification under Diverse Conditions [54.34001921326444]
  Speaker verification (SV) models are increasingly integrated into security, personalization, and access control systems.<n>Existing benchmarks evaluate only subsets of these conditions, missing others entirely.<n>We introduce SVeritas, a comprehensive Speaker Verification tasks benchmark suite, assessing SV systems under stressors like recording duration, spontaneity, content, noise, microphone distance, reverberation, channel mismatches, audio bandwidth, codecs, speaker age, and susceptibility to spoofing and adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-21T14:11:16Z)
• RARE: Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [33.389969814185214]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances recency and factuality in answers.<n>Existing evaluations rarely test how well RAG systems cope with real-world noise, conflicting between internal and external retrieved contexts, or fast-changing facts.<n>We introduce Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation (RARE), a unified framework and large-scale benchmark that jointly stress-test query and document perturbations over dynamic, time-sensitive corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T02:42:36Z)
• Unsupervised dense retrieval with conterfactual contrastive learning [16.679649921935482]
  We propose to improve the robustness of dense retrieval models by enhancing their sensitivity of fine-graned relevance signals.<n>A model achieving sensitivity in this context should exhibit high variances when documents' key passages determining their relevance to queries have been modified.<n>Motivated by causality and counterfactual analysis, we propose a series of counterfactual regularization methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T07:01:34Z)
• Improving the Robustness of Summarization Systems with Dual Augmentation [68.53139002203118]
  A robust summarization system should be able to capture the gist of the document, regardless of the specific word choices or noise in the input. We first explore the summarization models' robustness against perturbations including word-level synonym substitution and noise. We propose a SummAttacker, which is an efficient approach to generating adversarial samples based on language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T19:04:17Z)
• Stateful Offline Contextual Policy Evaluation and Learning [88.9134799076718]
  We study off-policy evaluation and learning from sequential data. We formalize the relevant causal structure of problems such as dynamic personalized pricing. We show improved out-of-sample policy performance in this class of relevant problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T16:15:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.