Knowledge Markers: An AI-Agnostic Concept for the Design of Programming Courses

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06331v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 18:13:40 GMT
• Title: Knowledge Markers: An AI-Agnostic Concept for the Design of Programming Courses
• Abstract summary: This paper contributes knowledge markers as a lightweight, AI-agnostic, course-level operationalisation for course design.<n>We show how the labels can be embedded at fine granularity in open teaching artifacts.<n>We demonstrate the approach by analysing, redesigning, and descriptively evaluating an introductory programming course.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI enables students to produce plausible code quickly. Producing working code is therefore no longer a reliable indicator of understanding. This is particularly problematic in non-computer-science programmes, where time constraints make it hard to balance conceptual foundations with sufficient application practice. Empirical studies of AI tutors, educational chatbots, and code-assistance systems report useful but often case-specific findings, while learning theory remains too abstract to directly guide course design. As a result, instructors lack a simple, reusable way to make learning intent explicit and translate it into concrete teaching structures and student learning behaviour. This paper contributes knowledge markers as a lightweight, AI-agnostic, course-level operationalisation for course design. The markers label learning units by their primary emphasis: (A) Application knowledge (implementation), (S) Structure knowledge (concepts and mental models), or (P) Procedure knowledge (systematic methods, decision making, and verification). We show how the labels can be embedded at fine granularity in open teaching artifacts (interactive website, PDF script, and notebooks), paired with communication elements and optional AI-usage guidance. We demonstrate the approach by analysing, redesigning, and descriptively evaluating an introductory programming course using marker distributions derived from the table of contents. The paper is design- and artifact-oriented and does not claim measured learning gains; empirical evaluation is future work.

Related papers

• Beyond AI Delegation: A Prompt Pattern Framework for Productive Struggle and Evaluative Judgement in Secure Coding Education [0.45706494756895794]
  Large language models make it easy for students to delegate writing, analysis, and problem-solving to automated systems.<n>We introduce a practical framework that helps educators keep GenAI in the course without removing the cognitive demands that make it worthwhile.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T07:35:49Z)
• Instructor-Aligned Knowledge Graphs for Personalized Learning [18.405486267157247]
  We propose InstructKG, a framework for automatically constructing instructor-aligned knowledge graphs.<n>InstructKG extracts significant concepts as nodes and infers learning dependencies as directed edges.<n>We demonstrate that InstructKG captures rich, instructor-aligned learning progressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T06:15:10Z)
• Ensuring Computer Science Learning in the AI Era: Open Generative AI Policies and Assignment-Driven Written Quizzes [0.0]
  This paper presents an assessment model that permits the use of generative AI for take-home programming assignments.<n>To promote authentic learning, in-class, closed-book assessments are weighted more heavily than the assignments themselves.<n> Statistical analyses revealed no meaningful linear correlation between GenAI usage levels and assessment outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T17:02:44Z)
• "I Like That You Have to Poke Around": Instructors on How Experiential Approaches to AI Literacy Spark Inquiry and Critical Thinking [0.5872014229110213]
  This paper presents findings from a study of AI User, a modular, web-based curriculum that teaches core AI concepts through interactive, no-code projects grounded in real-world scenarios.<n>Fifteen community college instructors participated in structured focus groups, completing the projects as learners and providing feedback through individual reflection and group discussion.<n>Findings highlight instructors' appreciation for exploratory tasks, role-based simulations, and real-world relevance, while also surfacing design trade-offs around cognitive load, guidance, and adaptability for diverse learners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T17:05:58Z)
• Knowledge Tagging System on Math Questions via LLMs with Flexible Demonstration Retriever [48.5585921817745]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are used to automate the knowledge tagging task. We show the strong performance of zero- and few-shot results over math questions knowledge tagging tasks. By proposing a reinforcement learning-based demonstration retriever, we successfully exploit the great potential of different-sized LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T23:30:01Z)
• A Knowledge-Injected Curriculum Pretraining Framework for Question Answering [70.13026036388794]
  We propose a general Knowledge-Injected Curriculum Pretraining framework (KICP) to achieve comprehensive KG learning and exploitation for Knowledge-based question answering tasks. The KI module first injects knowledge into the LM by generating KG-centered pretraining corpus, and generalizes the process into three key steps. The KA module learns knowledge from the generated corpus with LM equipped with an adapter as well as keeps its original natural language understanding ability. The CR module follows human reasoning patterns to construct three corpora with increasing difficulties of reasoning, and further trains the LM from easy to hard in a curriculum manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T03:42:03Z)
• Knowledge Tracing Challenge: Optimal Activity Sequencing for Students [0.9814642627359286]
  Knowledge tracing is a method used in education to assess and track the acquisition of knowledge by individual learners. We will present the results of the implementation of two Knowledge Tracing algorithms on a newly released dataset as part of the AAAI2023 Global Knowledge Tracing Challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T16:28:34Z)
• Learning by Applying: A General Framework for Mathematical Reasoning via Enhancing Explicit Knowledge Learning [47.96987739801807]
  We propose a framework to enhance existing models (backbones) in a principled way by explicit knowledge learning. In LeAp, we perform knowledge learning in a novel problem-knowledge-expression paradigm. We show that LeAp improves all backbones' performances, learns accurate knowledge, and achieves a more interpretable reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T15:15:41Z)
• Knowledgeable Salient Span Mask for Enhancing Language Models as Knowledge Base [51.55027623439027]
  We develop two solutions to help the model learn more knowledge from unstructured text in a fully self-supervised manner. To our best knowledge, we are the first to explore fully self-supervised learning of knowledge in continual pre-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T12:33:34Z)
• Symbolic AI for XAI: Evaluating LFIT Inductive Programming for Fair and Explainable Automatic Recruitment [11.460075612587591]
  We propose an ILP technique that can learn a propositional logic theory equivalent to a given black-box system. We show the expressiveness of LFIT for this specific problem and propose a scheme that can be applicable to other domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-01T09:36:59Z)
• The ILASP system for Inductive Learning of Answer Set Programs [79.41112438865386]
  Our system learns Answer Set Programs, including normal rules, choice rules and hard and weak constraints. We first give a general overview of ILASP's learning framework and its capabilities. This is followed by a comprehensive summary of the evolution of the ILASP system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-02T19:04:12Z)
• Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local Explanations Impact Annotator Experience [76.9910678786031]
  We propose a novel paradigm of explainable active learning (XAL), by introducing techniques from the recently surging field of explainable AI (XAI) into an Active Learning setting. Our study shows benefits of AI explanation as interfaces for machine teaching--supporting trust calibration and enabling rich forms of teaching feedback, and potential drawbacks--anchoring effect with the model judgment and cognitive workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:52:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.