Discrete Flow Matching Policy Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06491v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 21:49:29 GMT
• Title: Discrete Flow Matching Policy Optimization
• Abstract summary: We introduce a unified framework for Reinforcement Learning (RL) fine-tuning Discrete Flow Matching (DFM) models.<n>Our key idea is to view the DFM sampling procedure as a multi-step Markov Decision Process.<n>DoMinO achieves stronger predicted enhancer activity and better sequence naturalness than the previous best reward-driven baselines.
• Score: 12.864514553126186
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce Discrete flow Matching policy Optimization (DoMinO), a unified framework for Reinforcement Learning (RL) fine-tuning Discrete Flow Matching (DFM) models under a broad class of policy gradient methods. Our key idea is to view the DFM sampling procedure as a multi-step Markov Decision Process. This perspective provides a simple and transparent reformulation of fine-tuning reward maximization as a robust RL objective. Consequently, it not only preserves the original DFM samplers but also avoids biased auxiliary estimators and likelihood surrogates used by many prior RL fine-tuning methods. To prevent policy collapse, we also introduce new total-variation regularizers to keep the fine-tuned distribution close to the pretrained one. Theoretically, we establish an upper bound on the discretization error of DoMinO and tractable upper bounds for the regularizers. Experimentally, we evaluate DoMinO on regulatory DNA sequence design. DoMinO achieves stronger predicted enhancer activity and better sequence naturalness than the previous best reward-driven baselines. The regularization further improves alignment with the natural sequence distribution while preserving strong functional performance. These results establish DoMinO as an useful framework for controllable discrete sequence generation.

Related papers

• Reward Score Matching: Unifying Reward-based Fine-tuning for Flow and Diffusion Models [54.597200388738656]
  Reward-based fine-tuning aims to steer a pretrained diffusion or flow-based generative model toward higher-reward samples.<n>We show that many can be written under a common framework, which we call reward score matching (RSM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-19T12:47:52Z)
• Diffusion Controller: Framework, Algorithms and Parameterization [54.82539154511621]
  We present a unified control-theoretic view that casts reverse diffusion sampling as state-only control within (generalized) linearly-solvable Markov Decision Processes.<n>Under this framework, control acts by reweighting the pretrained reverse-time transition kernels, balancing terminal objectives against an $f$-divergence cost.<n>Experiments on Stable Diffusion v1.4 show consistent gains in preference-alignment win rates and improved quality-efficiency trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-07T01:49:59Z)
• Score-Guided Proximal Projection: A Unified Geometric Framework for Rectified Flow Editing [1.0312968200748118]
  Rectified Flow models achieve state-of-the-art generation quality, yet controlling them for precise tasks remains a challenge.<n>Current approaches bifurcate into inversion-based guidance, which suffers from "geometric locking"<n>We propose Score-Guided Proximal Projection, a unified framework that bridges the gap between deterministic optimization and contraction sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T23:44:45Z)
• Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning [72.25890308541334]
  Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serves as the de facto standard algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization (DPPO), which substitutes clipping with a more principled constraint.<n>DPPO achieves superior training and efficiency compared to existing methods, offering a more robust foundation for RL-based fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T18:59:04Z)
• Flow Density Control: Generative Optimization Beyond Entropy-Regularized Fine-Tuning [59.11663802446183]
  Flow and diffusion generative models can be adapted to optimize task-specific objectives while preserving prior information.<n>We introduce Flow Density Control (FDC), a simple algorithm that reduces this complex problem to a specific sequence of simpler fine-tuning tasks.<n>We derive convergence guarantees for the proposed scheme under realistic assumptions by leveraging recent understanding of mirror flows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T17:19:01Z)
• Refine Drugs, Don't Complete Them: Uniform-Source Discrete Flows for Fragment-Based Drug Discovery [0.0]
  We introduce InVirtuoGen, a discrete flow generative model for fragmented SMILES for de novo and fragment-constrained generation.<n>For property and lead optimization, we propose a hybrid scheme that combines a genetic algorithm with a Proximal Property Optimization fine-tuning strategy.<n>Our approach sets a new state-of-the-art on the Practical Molecular Optimization benchmark, measured by top-10 AUC across tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T15:34:53Z)
• Self-Boost via Optimal Retraining: An Analysis via Approximate Message Passing [58.52119063742121]
  Retraining a model using its own predictions together with the original, potentially noisy labels is a well-known strategy for improving the model performance.<n>This paper addresses the question of how to optimally combine the model's predictions and the provided labels.<n>Our main contribution is the derivation of the Bayes optimal aggregator function to combine the current model's predictions and the given labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T07:16:44Z)
• Preference Optimization via Contrastive Divergence: Your Reward Model is Secretly an NLL Estimator [32.05337749590184]
  We develop a novel PO framework that provides theoretical guidance to effectively sample dispreferred completions.<n>We then select contrastive divergence (CD) as sampling strategy, and propose a novel MC-PO algorithm.<n>OnMC-PO outperforms existing SOTA baselines, and OnMC-PO leads to further improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T23:45:08Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences.<n>To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model.<n>Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.