Auditing Demographic Bias in Facial Landmark Detection for Fair Human-Robot Interaction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06961v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 11:22:18 GMT
• Title: Auditing Demographic Bias in Facial Landmark Detection for Fair Human-Robot Interaction
• Abstract summary: We conduct a systematic audit of demographic bias in a human-robot interaction task.<n>We identify a statistically significant age-related effect, with higher biases observed for older individuals.<n>We argue that auditing and correcting such biases is a necessary step toward trustworthy and equitable robot perception systems.
• Score: 1.623939862557676
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Fairness in human-robot interaction critically depends on the reliability of the perceptual models that enable robots to interpret human behavior. While demographic biases have been widely studied in high-level facial analysis tasks, their presence in facial landmark detection remains unexplored. In this paper, we conduct a systematic audit of demographic bias in this task, analyzing the age, gender and race biases. To this end we introduce a controlled statistical methodology to disentangle demographic effects from confounding visual factors. Evaluations of a standard representative model demonstrate that confounding visual factors, particularly head pose and image resolution, heavily outweigh the impact of demographic attributes. Notably, after accounting for these confounders, we show that performance disparities across gender and race vanish. However, we identify a statistically significant age-related effect, with higher biases observed for older individuals. This shows that fairness issues can emerge even in low-level vision components and can propagate through the HRI pipeline, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations. We argue that auditing and correcting such biases is a necessary step toward trustworthy and equitable robot perception systems.

Related papers

• FairForensics: Seeing Expressions and Parsing Demographics via Vision-Language Modeling for Generalizable Fair Deepfake Detection [60.2868121662026]
  Existing fairness-enhanced detectors often suffer from suboptimal generalization to unseen manipulations and fairness across demographic groups.<n>We construct a novel demographically balanced FDD benchmark to train and evaluate the fairness of detectors under both balanced and imbalanced population scenarios.<n>We also introduce a novel expression and demographic perceptual vision-language model, termed FairForensics, for generalizable fair deepfake detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T03:51:14Z)
• Bridging the gap in FER: addressing age bias in deep learning [0.562479170374811]
  We study age-related bias in deep FER models, with a particular focus on the elderly population.<n>Using Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, we identify systematic disparities in expression recognition and attention patterns.<n>Results show consistent improvements in recognition accuracy for elderly individuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T11:07:13Z)
• Improving Bias in Facial Attribute Classification: A Combined Impact of KL Divergence induced Loss Function and Dual Attention [3.5527561584422465]
  Earlier systems often exhibited demographic bias, particularly in gender and racial classification, with lower accuracy for women and individuals with darker skin tones. This paper presents a method using a dual attention mechanism with a pre-trained Inception-ResNet V1 model, enhanced by KL-divergence regularization and a cross-entropy loss function. The experimental results show significant improvements in both fairness and classification accuracy, providing promising advances in addressing bias and enhancing the reliability of facial recognition systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T01:29:09Z)
• Towards Fair Face Verification: An In-depth Analysis of Demographic Biases [11.191375513738361]
  Deep learning-based person identification and verification systems have remarkably improved in terms of accuracy in recent years. However, such systems have been found to exhibit significant biases related to race, age, and gender. This paper presents an in-depth analysis, with a particular emphasis on the intersectionality of these demographic factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T14:49:14Z)
• Gender Biases in Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Image Captioning [87.15170977240643]
  We conduct a systematic study of gender biases in model-based evaluation metrics for image captioning tasks. We demonstrate the negative consequences of using these biased metrics, including the inability to differentiate between biased and unbiased generations. We present a simple and effective way to mitigate the metric bias without hurting the correlations with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T04:27:40Z)
• Robustness Disparities in Face Detection [64.71318433419636]
  We present the first of its kind detailed benchmark of face detection systems, specifically examining the robustness to noise of commercial and academic models. Across all the datasets and systems, we generally find that photos of individuals who are $textitmasculine presenting$, of $textitolder$, of $textitdarker skin type$, or have $textitdim lighting$ are more susceptible to errors than their counterparts in other identities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T05:22:47Z)
• Gender Stereotyping Impact in Facial Expression Recognition [1.5340540198612824]
  In recent years, machine learning-based models have become the most popular approach to Facial Expression Recognition (FER) In publicly available FER datasets, apparent gender representation is usually mostly balanced, but their representation in the individual label is not. We generate derivative datasets with different amounts of stereotypical bias by altering the gender proportions of certain labels. We observe a discrepancy in the recognition of certain emotions between genders of up to $29 %$ under the worst bias conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T10:52:23Z)
• A Deep Dive into Dataset Imbalance and Bias in Face Identification [49.210042420757894]
  Media portrayals often center imbalance as the main source of bias in automated face recognition systems. Previous studies of data imbalance in FR have focused exclusively on the face verification setting. This work thoroughly explores the effects of each kind of imbalance possible in face identification, and discuss other factors which may impact bias in this setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T20:23:13Z)
• Are Commercial Face Detection Models as Biased as Academic Models? [64.71318433419636]
  We compare academic and commercial face detection systems, specifically examining robustness to noise. We find that state-of-the-art academic face detection models exhibit demographic disparities in their noise robustness. We conclude that commercial models are always as biased or more biased than an academic model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T02:21:42Z)
• Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysis [86.79402670904338]
  Existing facial analysis systems have been shown to yield biased results against certain demographic subgroups. It has become imperative to ensure that these systems do not discriminate based on gender, identity, or skin tone of individuals. This has led to research in the identification and mitigation of bias in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-13T09:51:13Z)
• Comparing Human and Machine Bias in Face Recognition [46.170389064229354]
  We release improvements to the LFW and CelebA datasets which will enable future researchers to obtain measurements of algorithmic bias. We also use these new data to develop a series of challenging facial identification and verification questions. We find that both computer models and human survey participants perform significantly better at the verification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T22:26:20Z)
• Unravelling the Effect of Image Distortions for Biased Prediction of Pre-trained Face Recognition Models [86.79402670904338]
  We evaluate the performance of four state-of-the-art deep face recognition models in the presence of image distortions. We have observed that image distortions have a relationship with the performance gap of the model across different subgroups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-14T16:49:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.