Strategic Persuasion with Trait-Conditioned Multi-Agent Systems for Iterative Legal Argumentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07028v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 12:46:03 GMT
• Title: Strategic Persuasion with Trait-Conditioned Multi-Agent Systems for Iterative Legal Argumentation
• Abstract summary: We present the Strategic Courtroom Framework, a multi-agent simulation environment in which prosecution and defense teams engage in iterative, round-based legal argumentation.<n>Agents are instantiated using nine interpretable traits organized into four archetypes, enabling systematic control over rhetorical style and strategic orientation.<n>Our results show that heterogeneous teams with complementary traits consistently outperform homogeneous configurations, that moderate interaction depth yields more stable verdicts, and that certain traits (notably quantitative and charismatic) contribute disproportionately to persuasive success.
• Score: 0.5076419064097734
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Strategic interaction in adversarial domains such as law, diplomacy, and negotiation is mediated by language, yet most game-theoretic models abstract away the mechanisms of persuasion that operate through discourse. We present the Strategic Courtroom Framework, a multi-agent simulation environment in which prosecution and defense teams composed of trait-conditioned Large Language Model (LLM) agents engage in iterative, round-based legal argumentation. Agents are instantiated using nine interpretable traits organized into four archetypes, enabling systematic control over rhetorical style and strategic orientation. We evaluate the framework across 10 synthetic legal cases and 84 three-trait team configurations, totaling over 7{,}000 simulated trials using DeepSeek-R1 and Gemini~2.5~Pro. Our results show that heterogeneous teams with complementary traits consistently outperform homogeneous configurations, that moderate interaction depth yields more stable verdicts, and that certain traits (notably quantitative and charismatic) contribute disproportionately to persuasive success. We further introduce a reinforcement-learning-based Trait Orchestrator that dynamically generates defense traits conditioned on the case and opposing team, discovering strategies that outperform static, human-designed trait combinations. Together, these findings demonstrate how language can be treated as a first-class strategic action space and provide a foundation for building autonomous agents capable of adaptive persuasion in multi-agent environments.

Related papers

• Stateful Cooperative Agents Safeguarding LLMs Against Evolving Multi-Turn Attacks [56.45762972211923]
  We present a proactive defense framework for securing LLMs against evolving multi-turn adversarial attacks.<n>It employs a cooperative multi-agent architecture in which specialized agents execute complementary defense strategies.<n>We present the EMRA dataset designed to simulate evolving strategies across multi-turn attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T14:04:49Z)
• MA$^{2}$P: A Meta-Cognitive Autonomous Intelligent Agents Framework for Complex Persuasion [34.431254321873794]
  We propose MA$2$P, a meta-cognitive autonomous intelligent agent framework for complex persuasion.<n>Specifically, we develop an autonomous multi-agent architecture that coordinates perception management, mental-state inference, strategy execution, memory maintenance, evaluation.<n>Our approach achieves a higher persuasion success rate than baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T15:53:12Z)
• Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
  Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z)
• MARTI-MARS$^2$: Scaling Multi-Agent Self-Search via Reinforcement Learning for Code Generation [64.2621682259008]
  Multi-Agent Reinforced Training and Inference Framework with Self-Search Scaling (MARTI-MARS2)<n>We propose a Multi-Agent Reinforced Training and Inference Framework with Self-Search Scaling (MARTI-MARS2) to integrate policy learning with multi-agent tree search.<n>We show that MARTI-MARS2 achieves 77.7%, outperforming strong baselines like GPT-5.1 on challenging code generation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T07:28:44Z)
• MedSAM-Agent: Empowering Interactive Medical Image Segmentation with Multi-turn Agentic Reinforcement Learning [53.37068897861388]
  MedSAM-Agent is a framework that reformulates interactive segmentation as a multi-step autonomous decision-making process.<n>We develop a two-stage training pipeline that integrates multi-turn, end-to-end outcome verification.<n>Experiments across 6 medical modalities and 21 datasets demonstrate that MedSAM-Agent achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T09:47:49Z)
• AgenticSimLaw: A Juvenile Courtroom Multi-Agent Debate Simulation for Explainable High-Stakes Tabular Decision Making [0.6218206949753592]
  We introduce AgenticSimLaw, a role-structured, multi-agent debate framework that provides transparent and controllable testtime reasoning.<n>Unlike black-box approaches, our courtroom-style orchestration explicitly defines agent roles.<n>We benchmark this framework on young adult recidivism prediction using the NLSY97 dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T16:26:10Z)
• OPTAGENT: Optimizing Multi-Agent LLM Interactions Through Verbal Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced Reasoning [14.105640933123325]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable reasoning capabilities in mathematical and scientific tasks.<n>To enhance complex reasoning, multi-agent systems have been proposed to harness the collective intelligence of LLM agents.<n>We propose $ours$, a multi-agent verbal reinforcement learning algorithm that dynamically constructs and refines multi-agent collaboration structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T19:07:51Z)
• LLMs as Strategic Agents: Beliefs, Best Response Behavior, and Emergent Heuristics [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to domains that require reasoning about other agents' behavior.<n>We show that current frontier models exhibit belief-coherent best-response behavior at targeted reasoning memorization.<n>Under increasing complexity, explicit recursion gives way to internally generated rules of choice that are stable, model-specific, and distinct from known human biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-12T21:40:29Z)
• Can an Individual Manipulate the Collective Decisions of Multi-Agents? [53.01767232004823]
  M-Spoiler is a framework that simulates agent interactions within a multi-agent system to generate adversarial samples.<n>M-Spoiler introduces a stubborn agent that actively aids in optimizing adversarial samples.<n>Our findings confirm the risks posed by the knowledge of an individual agent in multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T01:54:20Z)
• The Traitors: Deception and Trust in Multi-Agent Language Model Simulations [0.0]
  We introduce The Traitors, a multi-agent simulation framework inspired by social deduction games.<n>We develop a suite of evaluation metrics capturing deception success, trust dynamics, and collective inference quality.<n>Our initial experiments across DeepSeek-V3, GPT-4o-mini, and GPT-4o (10 runs per model) reveal a notable asymmetry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T10:01:35Z)
• ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models [89.53040828210945]
  ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents. ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations. ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z)
• RESPER: Computationally Modelling Resisting Strategies in Persuasive Conversations [0.7505101297221454]
  We propose a generalised framework for identifying resisting strategies in persuasive conversations. Our experiments reveal the asymmetry of power roles in non-collaborative goal-directed conversations. We also investigate the role of different resisting strategies on the conversation outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-26T03:44:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.