Don't Measure Once: Measuring Visibility in AI Search (GEO)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07585v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:38:05 GMT
• Title: Don't Measure Once: Measuring Visibility in AI Search (GEO)
• Abstract summary: In classical search engines, a single query provides a representative snapshot of where a page or brand appears relative to competitors.<n>The inherent probabilistic nature of AI search changes this paradigm.<n>Our findings underscore the need for repeated measurements to assess a brand's GEO performance.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As large language model-based chat systems become increasingly widely used, generative engine optimization (GEO) has emerged as an important problem for information access and retrieval. In classical search engines, results are comparatively transparent and stable: a single query often provides a representative snapshot of where a page or brand appears relative to competitors. The inherent probabilistic nature of AI search changes this paradigm. Answers can vary across runs, prompts, and time, making one-off observations unreliable. Drawing on empirical studies, our findings underscore the need for repeated measurements to assess a brand's GEO performance and to characterize visibility as a distribution rather than a single-point outcome.

Related papers

• Algorithmic Trust and Compliance: Benchmarking Brand Notability for UK iGaming Entities in Generative Search Engines [0.0]
  We are witnessing a shift from traditional ranked lists to synthesized, citation-backed answers.<n>In highly regulated environments like the UK iGaming sector, visibility is no longer dictated by keyword density, but by an entity's ability to project "Algorithmic Trust"<n>Recent large-scale experiments reveal that AI Search exhibits a systematic and overwhelming bias towards Earned media (third-party, authoritative sources) over Brand-owned content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T09:17:12Z)
• Evaluating the Search Agent in a Parallel World [28.24678964635285]
  We introduce Mind-ParaWorld, a framework for evaluating Search Agents in a Parallel World.<n>A ParaWorld Law Model constructs a set of indivisible Atomic Facts and a unique ground-truth for each question.<n>During evaluation, instead of retrieving real-world results, the agent interacts with a ParaWorld Model.<n>We release MPW-Bench, an interactive benchmark spanning 19 domains with 1,608 instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T02:56:42Z)
• DeepImageSearch: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Context-Aware Image Retrieval in Visual Histories [52.57197752244638]
  We introduce DeepImageSearch, a novel agentic paradigm that reformulates image retrieval as an autonomous exploration task.<n>Models must plan and perform multi-step reasoning over raw visual histories to locate targets based on implicit contextual cues.<n>We construct DISBench, a challenging benchmark built on interconnected visual data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T12:51:10Z)
• GISA: A Benchmark for General Information-Seeking Assistant [102.30831921333755]
  GISA is a benchmark for General Information-Seeking Assistants comprising 373 human-crafted queries.<n>It integrates both deep reasoning and broad information aggregation within unified tasks, and includes a live subset with periodically updated answers to resist memorization.<n>Experiments on mainstream LLMs and commercial search products reveal that even the best-performing model achieves only 19.30% exact match score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T11:44:15Z)
• Pixel-Grounded Retrieval for Knowledgeable Large Multimodal Models [58.46663983451155]
  PixSearch is an end-to-end Segmenting Large Multimodal Model (LMM) that unifies region-level perception and retrieval-augmented reasoning.<n>During encoding, PixSearch emits search> tokens to trigger retrieval, selects query modalities (text, image, or region), and generates pixel-level masks that directly serve as visual queries.<n>On egocentric and entity-centric VQA benchmarks, PixSearch substantially improves factual consistency and generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T00:46:08Z)
• Generative Engine Optimization: How to Dominate AI Search [13.959899706228176]
  Generative AI-powered search engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini are reshaping information retrieval.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of AI Search and traditional web search (Google)<n>Our key findings reveal that AI Search exhibit a systematic and overwhelming bias towards Earned media (third-party, authoritative sources) over Brand-owned and Social content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T18:29:18Z)
• Developing Visual Augmented Q&A System using Scalable Vision Embedding Retrieval & Late Interaction Re-ranker [0.0]
  This paper explores a pragmatic approach to make vision retrieval process scalable and efficient without compromising on performance quality.<n>We propose multi-step custom implementation utilizing widely adopted hybrid search (metadata & embedding) and state of the art late interaction re-ranker to retrieve best matching pages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T16:27:05Z)
• MMSearch-R1: Incentivizing LMMs to Search [49.889749277236376]
  We present MMSearch-R1, the first end-to-end reinforcement learning framework that enables on-demand, multi-turn search in real-world Internet environments.<n>Our framework integrates both image and text search tools, allowing the model to reason about when and how to invoke them guided by an outcome-based reward with a search penalty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T17:59:42Z)
• Search Arena: Analyzing Search-Augmented LLMs [61.28673331156436]
  We introduce Search Arena, a crowd-sourced, large-scale, human-preference dataset of over 24,000 paired multi-turn user interactions.<n>The dataset spans diverse intents and languages, and contains full system traces with around 12,000 human preference votes.<n>Our analysis reveals that user preferences are influenced by the number of citations, even when the cited content does not directly support the attributed claims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T17:59:26Z)
• CART: A Generative Cross-Modal Retrieval Framework with Coarse-To-Fine Semantic Modeling [53.97609687516371]
  Cross-modal retrieval aims to search for instances, which are semantically related to the query through the interaction of different modal data.<n>Traditional solutions utilize a single-tower or dual-tower framework to explicitly compute the score between queries and candidates.<n>We propose a generative cross-modal retrieval framework (CART) based on coarse-to-fine semantic modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T12:47:04Z)
• Detection of Interacting Variables for Generalized Linear Models via Neural Networks [0.0]
  We present an approach to automating the process of finding interactions that should be added to generalized linear models (GLMs) Our approach relies on neural networks and a model-specific interaction detection method, which is computationally faster than the traditionally used methods like Friedman H-Statistic or SHAP values. In numerical studies, we provide the results of our approach on artificially generated data as well as open-source data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T16:16:45Z)
• Exposing Query Identification for Search Transparency [69.06545074617685]
  We explore the feasibility of approximate exposing query identification (EQI) as a retrieval task by reversing the role of queries and documents in two classes of search systems. We derive an evaluation metric to measure the quality of a ranking of exposing queries, as well as conducting an empirical analysis focusing on various practical aspects of approximate EQI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T20:19:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.