EigentSearch-Q+: Enhancing Deep Research Agents with Structured Reasoning Tools
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07927v2
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:14:03 GMT
- Title: EigentSearch-Q+: Enhancing Deep Research Agents with Structured Reasoning Tools
- Abstract summary: We introduce Q+, a set of query and evidence processing tools that make web search more deliberate.<n>We integrate Q+ into the browser sub-agent of Eigent, an open-source, production-ready multi-agent workforce.<n>Across four benchmarks, Q+ improves Eigent's browser agent benchmark-size-weighted average accuracy by 3.0, 3.8, and 0.6 percentage points (pp)
- Score: 12.61248869302151
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Deep research requires reasoning over web evidence to answer open-ended questions, and it is a core capability for AI agents. Yet many deep research agents still rely on implicit, unstructured search behavior that causes redundant exploration and brittle evidence aggregation. Motivated by Anthropic's "think" tool paradigm and insights from the information-retrieval literature, we introduce Q+, a set of query and evidence processing tools that make web search more deliberate by guiding query planning, monitoring search progress, and extracting evidence from long web snapshots. We integrate Q+ into the browser sub-agent of Eigent, an open-source, production-ready multi-agent workforce for computer use, yielding EigentSearch-Q+. Across four benchmarks (SimpleQA-Verified, FRAMES, WebWalkerQA, and X-Bench DeepSearch), Q+ improves Eigent's browser agent benchmark-size-weighted average accuracy by 3.0, 3.8, and 0.6 percentage points (pp) for GPT-4.1, GPT-5.1, and Minimax M2.5 model backends, respectively. Case studies further suggest that EigentSearch-Q+ produces more coherent tool-calling trajectories by making search progress and evidence handling explicit.
Related papers
- SearchMaster: Grounded and Regulated Self-Play for Search Agents [57.537666863340284]
Training search agents requires high-quality search data.<n> Existing pipelines often depend on human-written tasks, expert demonstrations, or stronger teacher models.<n>We present SearchMaster, a self-play framework that trains a single LLM from search tasks it generates, solves, and verifies in a local search environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-03T07:29:11Z) - AutoResearchBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Complex Scientific Literature Discovery [55.70879973230979]
AutoResearchBench is a benchmark for autonomous scientific literature discovery.<n>Compared to previous benchmarks on agentic web browsing, AutoResearchBench is research-oriented.<n>Even the most powerful LLMs, despite having largely conquered general agentic web-browsing benchmarks such as BrowseComp, achieve only 9.39% accuracy on Deep Research and 9.31% IoU on Wide Research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T06:05:17Z) - AgentIR: Reasoning-Aware Retrieval for Deep Research Agents [76.29382561831105]
Deep Research agents generate explicit natural language reasoning before each search call.<n> Reasoning-Aware Retrieval embeds the agent's reasoning trace alongside its query.<n>DR- Synth generates Deep Research retriever training data from standard QA datasets.<n>AgentIR-4B achieves 68% accuracy with the open-weight agent Tongyi-DeepResearch.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-04T18:47:26Z) - MM-DeepResearch: A Simple and Effective Multimodal Agentic Search Baseline [26.19213349415094]
We aim to develop a multimodal research agent capable of explicit reasoning and planning, multi-tool invocation, and cross-modal information synthesis.<n>We observe three main challenges in developing such agents: (1) scarcity of search-intensive multimodal QA data, (2) lack of effective search trajectories, and (3) prohibitive cost of training with online search APIs.<n>With the three designs, we develop MM-DeepResearch, a powerful multimodal deep research agent, and extensive results shows its superiority across benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-01T11:13:22Z) - InfoAgent: Advancing Autonomous Information-Seeking Agents [143.15973604285304]
We introduce InfoAgent, a deep research agent powered by an innovative data synthesis pipeline and orchestrated web search tools.<n>With our methods, InfoAgent achieves 15.3% accuracy on BrowseComp, 29.2% on BrowseComp-ZH, and 40.4% on Xbench-DS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T17:59:57Z) - Fathom-DeepResearch: Unlocking Long Horizon Information Retrieval and Synthesis for SLMs [7.3517692707289415]
We introduce Fathom-DeepResearch, an agentic system composed of two specialized models.<n>The first is Fathom-Search-4B, a DeepSearch model optimized for evidence-based investigation through live web search and targeted webpage querying.<n>The second is Fathom- Synthesizer-4B, trained from Qwen3-4B, which converts multi-turn DeepSearch traces into structured, citation-dense DeepResearch Reports.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T22:58:11Z) - BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent [74.10138164281618]
BrowseComp-Plus is a benchmark derived from BrowseComp, employing a fixed, carefully curated corpus.<n>This benchmark allows comprehensive evaluation and disentangled analysis of deep research agents and retrieval methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-08T17:55:11Z) - MMSearch-R1: Incentivizing LMMs to Search [49.889749277236376]
We present MMSearch-R1, the first end-to-end reinforcement learning framework that enables on-demand, multi-turn search in real-world Internet environments.<n>Our framework integrates both image and text search tools, allowing the model to reason about when and how to invoke them guided by an outcome-based reward with a search penalty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T17:59:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.