"Why This Avoidance Maneuver?" Contrastive Explanations in Human-Supervised Maritime Autonomous Navigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08032v1
• Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 09:37:43 GMT
• Title: "Why This Avoidance Maneuver?" Contrastive Explanations in Human-Supervised Maritime Autonomous Navigation
• Abstract summary: This paper explores how to explain causal logic behind avoidance maneuvers in a selective, understandable manner for supervisors with a nautical background.<n>We propose a method for generating contrastive explanations, which provide human-centric insights.<n>An exploratory user study with four experienced marine officers suggests that contrastive explanations support the understanding of the system's objectives.
• Score: 6.365194490730867
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Automated maritime collision avoidance will rely on human supervision for the foreseeable future. This necessitates transparency into how the system perceives a scenario and plans a maneuver. However, the causal logic behind avoidance maneuvers is often complex and difficult to convey to a navigator. This paper explores how to explain these factors in a selective, understandable manner for supervisors with a nautical background. We propose a method for generating contrastive explanations, which provide human-centric insights by comparing a system's proposed solution against relevant alternatives. To evaluate this, we developed a framework that uses visual and textual cues to highlight key objectives from a state-of-the-art collision avoidance system. An exploratory user study with four experienced marine officers suggests that contrastive explanations support the understanding of the system's objectives. However, our findings also reveal that while these explanations are highly valuable in complex multi-vessel encounters, they can increase cognitive workload, suggesting that future maritime interfaces may benefit most from demand-driven or scenario-specific explanation strategies.

Related papers

• LatentPilot: Scene-Aware Vision-and-Language Navigation by Dreaming Ahead with Latent Visual Reasoning [51.969318585152116]
  LatentPilot exploits future observations during training as a valuable data source to learn action-conditioned visual dynamics.<n>We propose a flywheel-style training mechanism that iteratively collects on-policy trajectories and retrains the model to better match the agent's behavior distribution.<n> Experiments on R2R-CE, RxR-CE, and R2R-PE benchmarks achieve new SOTA results, and real-robot tests across diverse environments demonstrate LatentPilot's superior understanding of environment-action dynamics in scene.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T02:21:59Z)
• The Scenic Route to Deception: Dark Patterns and Explainability Pitfalls in Conversational Navigation [0.0]
  We argue that conversational interfaces introduce risks of manipulation and misplaced trust.<n>We categorise these risks using a 2x2 framework based on intent and origin.<n>We suggest that one robust way to operationalise trustworthy conversational navigation is through neuro-symbolic architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-15T20:10:00Z)
• WaterVideoQA: ASV-Centric Perception and Rule-Compliant Reasoning via Multi-Modal Agents [23.828845891763617]
  We present WaterVideoQA, the first large-scale, comprehensive Video Question Answering benchmark specifically engineered for all-waterway environments.<n>We also introduce NaviMind, a pioneering multi-agent neuro-symbolic system designed for open-ended maritime reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T12:12:40Z)
• DSCD-Nav: Dual-Stance Cooperative Debate for Object Navigation [63.439158093945956]
  We propose Dual-Stance Cooperative Debate Navigation (DSCD-Nav) to replace one-shot scoring with stance-based cross-checking and evidence-aware arbitration.<n> Experiments on HM3Dv1, HM3Dv2, and MP3D demonstrate consistent improvements in success and path efficiency while reducing exploration redundancy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T08:47:55Z)
• NavigateDiff: Visual Predictors are Zero-Shot Navigation Assistants [24.689242976554482]
  Navigating unfamiliar environments presents significant challenges for household robots.<n>Existing reinforcement learning methods cannot be directly transferred to new environments.<n>We try to transfer the logical knowledge and the generalization ability of pre-trained foundation models to zero-shot navigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T17:27:47Z)
• Sea-cret Agents: Maritime Abduction for Region Generation to Expose Dark Vessel Trajectories [0.6037276428689637]
  Bad actors in the maritime industry engage in illegal behaviors after disabling their vessel's automatic identification system (AIS)<n>Machine learning approaches only succeed in identifying the locations of these dark vessels'' in the immediate future.<n>We combine concepts from abduction, logic programming, and rule learning to create an efficient method that approaches full recall of dark vessels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T16:36:26Z)
• Floor extraction and door detection for visually impaired guidance [78.94595951597344]
  Finding obstacle-free paths in unknown environments is a big navigation issue for visually impaired people and autonomous robots. New devices based on computer vision systems can help impaired people to overcome the difficulties of navigating in unknown environments in safe conditions. In this work it is proposed a combination of sensors and algorithms that can lead to the building of a navigation system for visually impaired people.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T14:38:43Z)
• Deep Learning for Embodied Vision Navigation: A Survey [108.13766213265069]
  "Embodied visual navigation" problem requires an agent to navigate in a 3D environment mainly rely on its first-person observation. This paper attempts to establish an outline of the current works in the field of embodied visual navigation by providing a comprehensive literature survey.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T12:09:04Z)
• Congestion-aware Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction for Collision Avoidance [110.63037190641414]
  We propose to learn congestion patterns explicitly and devise a novel "Sense--Learn--Reason--Predict" framework. By decomposing the learning phases into two stages, a "student" can learn contextual cues from a "teacher" while generating collision-free trajectories. In experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed model is able to generate collision-free trajectory predictions in a synthetic dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:33Z)
• Active Visual Information Gathering for Vision-Language Navigation [115.40768457718325]
  Vision-language navigation (VLN) is the task of entailing an agent to carry out navigational instructions inside photo-realistic environments. One of the key challenges in VLN is how to conduct a robust navigation by mitigating the uncertainty caused by ambiguous instructions and insufficient observation of the environment. This work draws inspiration from human navigation behavior and endows an agent with an active information gathering ability for a more intelligent VLN policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-15T23:54:20Z)
• Challenges in Vessel Behavior and Anomaly Detection: From Classical Machine Learning to Deep Learning [10.61567813380562]
  We discuss challenges and opportunities in classical machine learning and deep learning for vessel event and anomaly detection. We hope to motivate the research of novel methods and tools, since addressing these challenges is an essential step towards actual intelligent maritime monitoring systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T21:25:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.