A Comparative Theoretical Analysis of Entropy Control Methods in Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09676v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 18:52:59 GMT
• Title: A Comparative Theoretical Analysis of Entropy Control Methods in Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a key approach for enhancing reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>This paper provides a comparative theoretical analysis of two entropy control strategies: traditional entropy regularization and the recently proposed covariance-based mechanism.
• Score: 3.002731187735679
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a key approach for enhancing reasoning in large language models (LLMs), yet scalable training is often hindered by the rapid collapse of policy entropy, which leads to premature convergence and performance saturation. This paper provides a comparative theoretical analysis of two entropy control strategies: traditional entropy regularization and the recently proposed covariance-based mechanism. We establish a unified framework for entropy dynamics under softmax parameterization, showing that entropy change is governed by the covariance between log-probabilities and logit updates. Our analysis reveals that traditional entropy regularization introduces a dense, persistent bias that modifies the stationary condition, leading to suboptimal policies, while covariance-based methods selectively regularize a sparse subset of high-covariance tokens and achieve asymptotic unbiasedness when the regularization coefficient is annealed. These results provide principled guidelines for entropy control in LLM posttraining, with implications for scaling RL to larger models and more complex reasoning tasks.

Related papers

• Entropy Regularization Improves Policy Robustness in Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning [42.77878041827321]
  This paper establishes the first robustness guarantees for entropy-regularized continuous-time Markov decision processes.<n>We analytically characterize the induced robust sets and prove that they expand monotonically with the regularization strength.<n> Experiments on queueing network control and market making confirm our theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-03T10:09:39Z)
• Entropy Polarity in Reinforcement Fine-Tuning: Direction, Asymmetry, and Control [77.8471519867791]
  Empirically, we show that entropy polarity reliably predicts entropy changes.<n>We propose Polarity-Aware Policy Optimization (PAPO), which preserves both polarity branches and implements entropy control through advantage reweighting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T08:47:05Z)
• Understanding and Preventing Entropy Collapse in RLVR with On-Policy Entropy Flow Optimization [53.75029276020459]
  We propose an adaptive entropy flow balancing mechanism that rescales entropy-increasing and entropy-decreasing updates according to their contributions to entropy change.<n>Experiments on six mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that OPEFO improves training and final performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T04:08:17Z)
• Offline Policy Optimization with Posterior Sampling [18.74544103863437]
  A fundamental challenge in model-based offline reinforcement learning (RL) lies in the trade-off between generalization and robustness.<n>We propose Posterior Sampling-based Policy Optimization (PSPO), which formulates dynamics modeling as a Bayesian inference process.<n> Experiments on standard benchmarks validate PSPO achieves superior performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T07:48:21Z)
• Flexible Entropy Control in RLVR with Gradient-Preserving Perspective [19.86794452199207]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a critical method for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>This paper proposes reshaping entropy control in RL from the perspective of Gradient-Preserving Clipping.<n>We introduce a novel regulation mechanism using dynamic clipping threshold to precisely manage entropy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T13:42:12Z)
• On the Entropy Dynamics in Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models [54.61810451777578]
  Entropy serves as a critical metric for measuring the diversity of outputs generated by large language models.<n>Recent studies increasingly focus on monitoring and adjusting entropy to better balance exploration and exploitation in reinforcement fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T11:14:58Z)
• The Procrustean Bed of Time Series: The Optimization Bias of Point-wise Loss [53.542743390809356]
  This paper aims to provide a first-principles analysis of the Expectation of Optimization Bias (EOB)<n>Our analysis reveals a fundamental paradigm paradox: the more deterministic and structured the time series, the more severe the bias by point-wise loss function.<n>We present a concrete solution that simultaneously achieves both principles via DFT or DWT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T06:08:22Z)
• Revisiting Entropy in Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models [54.96908589622163]
  We investigate the entropy dynamics of large language models trained withReinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR)<n>Our findings reveal that the number of off-policy updates, the diversity of training data, and the clipping thresholds in the optimization objective are critical factors influencing the entropy of LLMs trained with RLVR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T12:50:41Z)
• State Entropy Regularization for Robust Reinforcement Learning [49.08983925413188]
  We show that state entropy regularization improves robustness to structured and spatially correlated perturbations.<n>These types of variation are common in transfer learning but often overlooked by standard robust reinforcement learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T11:15:31Z)
• The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models [99.98293908799731]
  This paper aims to overcome a major obstacle in scaling RL for reasoning with LLMs, namely the collapse of policy entropy.<n>In practice, we establish a transformation equation R=-a*eH+b between entropy H and downstream performance R.<n>We propose two simple yet effective techniques, namely Clip-Cov and KL-Cov, which clip and apply KL penalty to tokens with high covariances respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:38:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.