Lost in Diffusion: Uncovering Hallucination Patterns and Failure Modes in Diffusion Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10556v1
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 09:59:41 GMT
- Title: Lost in Diffusion: Uncovering Hallucination Patterns and Failure Modes in Diffusion Large Language Models
- Abstract summary: We present the first controlled comparative study to evaluate hallucination patterns in dLLMs.<n>Our results demonstrate that current dLLMs exhibit a higher propensity for hallucination than AR counterparts controlled for architecture, scale, and pre-training weights.<n>Our findings underscore that although dLLMs have narrowed the performance gap on general tasks, their distinct hallucination mechanisms pose a critical challenge to model reliability.
- Score: 10.020835642521897
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: While Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) have emerged as a promising non-autoregressive paradigm comparable to autoregressive (AR) models, their faithfulness, specifically regarding hallucination, remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we present the first controlled comparative study to evaluate hallucination patterns in dLLMs. Our results demonstrate that current dLLMs exhibit a higher propensity for hallucination than AR counterparts controlled for architecture, scale, and pre-training weights. Furthermore, an analysis of inference-time compute reveals divergent dynamics: while quasi-autoregressive generation suffers from early saturation, non-sequential decoding unlocks potential for continuous refinement. Finally, we identify distinct failure modes unique to the diffusion process, including premature termination, incomplete denoising, and context intrusion. Our findings underscore that although dLLMs have narrowed the performance gap on general tasks, their distinct hallucination mechanisms pose a critical challenge to model reliability. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZeroLoss-Lab/Lost-in-Diffusion
Related papers
- DeMTS: Denoising Trajectories as Multivariate Time Series for Hallucination Detection in Diffusion Language Models [59.414664850109155]
Diffusion large language models (D-LLMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for text generation.<n>D-LLMs remain vulnerable to hallucinations, where fluent outputs may contain factually incorrect or unsupported content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-24T06:45:43Z) - TRE: Training-Free Hallucination Detection for Diffusion Language Models [9.622962795441852]
We propose TRE, a training-free hallucination detection metric for D-LLMs.<n> TRE estimates hallucination risk directly from the entropy signals of a single generation, without requiring any detector training or repeated sampling.<n>Extensive experiments on multiple D-LLMs and QA datasets demonstrate that TRE achieves competitive performance, while enjoying strong generalizability, efficiency, and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T00:47:48Z) - Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Diffusion Models [35.87984313223733]
Large Language Diffusion Models (LLDMs) are emerging as an alternative to autoregressive models.<n>Existing uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods assume autoregressive factorization or use expensive repeated sampling.<n>We present the first systematic study of UQ for LLDMs and propose lightweight, zero-shot uncertainty signals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T08:39:56Z) - Local Intrinsic Dimension Unveils Hallucinations in Diffusion Models [18.55564482332065]
Diffusion models are prone to generating structural hallucinations.<n>We propose a complementary perspective that treats hallucinations as instabilities on the model-induced manifold.<n>We show that a hallucination filter based on such instabilities matches or exceeds the performance of the recently proposed temporal one.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-06T15:22:52Z) - Mitigating Entangled Steering in Large Vision-Language Models for Hallucination Reduction [49.96701537295129]
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable success across cross-modal tasks but remain hindered by hallucinations.<n>Existing methods mitigate hallucinations but often alter generation behavior, resulting in shorter outputs and shifted token distributions.<n>We propose MESA, an effective plug-and-play framework that performs controlled and selective latent intervention for hallucination mitigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T07:31:27Z) - DynHD: Hallucination Detection for Diffusion Large Language Models via Denoising Dynamics Deviation Learning [48.77865928715759]
Diffusion large language models (D-LLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to auto-regressive models.<n> hallucination remains a critical issue that hinders their reliability.<n>We propose DynHD that bridge these gaps from both spatial (token sequence) and temporal (denoising dynamics) perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T12:40:29Z) - TraceDet: Hallucination Detection from the Decoding Trace of Diffusion Large Language Models [49.83690850047884]
hallucination problem in D-LLMs remains underexplored, limiting their reliability in real-world applications.<n>Existing hallucination detection methods are designed for AR-LLMs and rely on signals from single-step generation.<n>We propose TraceDet, a novel framework that explicitly leverages the intermediate denoising steps of D-LLMs for hallucination detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T02:01:10Z) - Counterfactual Probing for Hallucination Detection and Mitigation in Large Language Models [0.0]
We propose Counterfactual Probing, a novel approach for detecting and mitigating hallucinations in large language models.<n>Our method dynamically generates counterfactual statements that appear plausible but contain subtle factual errors, then evaluates the model's sensitivity to these perturbations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-03T17:29:48Z) - Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Intervention [10.642552315531404]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have revolutionized cross-modal understanding but continue to struggle with hallucinations.<n>We propose SENTINEL, a framework that eliminates dependency on human annotations.<n>Sentence-level Early iNtervention Through IN-domain prEference Learning can reduce hallucinations by over 90% compared to the original model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-16T17:55:43Z) - Shaking to Reveal: Perturbation-Based Detection of LLM Hallucinations [25.18901449626428]
A widely adopted strategy to detect hallucination, known as self-assessment, relies on the model's own output confidence to estimate the factual accuracy of its answers.<n>We propose Sample-Specific Prompting (SSP), a new framework that improves self-assessment by analyzing perturbation sensitivity at intermediate representations.<n>SSP significantly outperforms prior methods across a range of hallucination detection benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T09:44:28Z) - Spatial Reasoning with Denoising Models [49.83744014336816]
We introduce a framework to perform reasoning over sets of continuous variables via denoising generative models.<n>For the first time, that order of generation can successfully be predicted by the denoising network itself.<n>Using these findings, we can increase the accuracy of specific reasoning tasks from 1% to >50%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-28T14:08:30Z) - One-for-More: Continual Diffusion Model for Anomaly Detection [63.50488826645681]
Anomaly detection methods utilize diffusion models to generate or reconstruct normal samples when given arbitrary anomaly images.<n>Our study found that the diffusion model suffers from severe faithfulness hallucination'' and catastrophic forgetting''<n>We propose a continual diffusion model that uses gradient projection to achieve stable continual learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-27T07:47:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.