Evaluating Cooperation in LLM Social Groups through Elected Leadership

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11721v2
• Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 19:02:31 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Cooperation in LLM Social Groups through Elected Leadership
• Abstract summary: We present our open-source framework that simulates leadership through elected personas and candidate-driven agendas.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that having elected leadership improves social welfare scores by 55.4% and survival time by 128.6%.<n>This work lays the foundation for further study of election mechanisms in multi-agent systems.
• Score: 12.51154965291689
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Governing common-pool resources requires agents to develop enduring strategies through cooperation and self-governance to avoid collective failure. While foundation models have shown potential for cooperation in these settings, existing multi-agent research provides little insight into whether structured leadership and election mechanisms can improve collective decision making. The lack of such a critical organizational feature ubiquitous in human society presents a significant shortcoming of the current methods. In this work we aim to directly address whether leadership and elections can support improved social welfare and cooperation through multi-agent simulation with LLMs. We present our open-source framework that simulates leadership through elected personas and candidate-driven agendas and carry out an empirical study of LLMs under controlled governance conditions. Our experiments demonstrate that having elected leadership improves social welfare scores by 55.4% and survival time by 128.6% across a range of high performing LLMs. Through the construction of an agent social graph we compute centrality metrics to assess the social influence of leader personas and also analyze rhetorical and cooperative tendencies revealed through a sentiment analysis on leader utterances. This work lays the foundation for further study of election mechanisms in multi-agent systems toward navigating complex social dilemmas.

Related papers

• Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems [65.90791804095561]
  Multi-agent systems address this through structured collaboration among specialized agents, but tighter coordination amplifies a less explored risk.<n>Existing surveys cover individual agent capabilities, multi-agent collaboration, or agent self-evolution separately, leaving the causal dependencies among them unexamined.<n>This survey provides a unified review organized around four causally linked stages, which we term the LIFE progression: Lay the capability foundation, Integrate agents through collaboration, Find faults through attribution, and Evolve through autonomous self-improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T14:36:13Z)
• The Role of Social Learning and Collective Norm Formation in Fostering Cooperation in LLM Multi-Agent Systems [13.628908663240564]
  We introduce a CPR simulation framework that removes explicit reward signals and embeds cultural-evolutionary mechanisms.<n>We examine norm evolution across a $2times2$ grid of environmental and social initialisations.<n>Our results reveal systematic model differences in sustaining cooperation and norm formation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T07:59:31Z)
• CoMAS: Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems via Interaction Rewards [80.78748457530718]
  Self-evolution is a central research topic in enabling large language model (LLM)-based agents to continually improve their capabilities after pretraining.<n>We introduce Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems (CoMAS), a novel framework that enables agents to improve autonomously by learning from inter-agent interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:50:26Z)
• Social Welfare Function Leaderboard: When LLM Agents Allocate Social Welfare [87.06241096619112]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly entrusted with high-stakes decisions that affect human welfare.<n>We introduce the Social Welfare Function Benchmark, a dynamic simulation environment where an LLM acts as a sovereign allocator.<n>We evaluate 20 state-of-the-art LLMs and present the first leaderboard for social welfare allocation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T17:52:31Z)
• Corrupted by Reasoning: Reasoning Language Models Become Free-Riders in Public Goods Games [87.5673042805229]
  How large language models balance self-interest and collective well-being is a critical challenge for ensuring alignment, robustness, and safe deployment.<n>We adapt a public goods game with institutional choice from behavioral economics, allowing us to observe how different LLMs navigate social dilemmas.<n>Surprisingly, we find that reasoning LLMs, such as the o1 series, struggle significantly with cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T15:02:47Z)
• Cooperate or Collapse: Emergence of Sustainable Cooperation in a Society of LLM Agents [101.17919953243107]
  GovSim is a generative simulation platform designed to study strategic interactions and cooperative decision-making in large language models (LLMs)<n>We find that all but the most powerful LLM agents fail to achieve a sustainable equilibrium in GovSim, with the highest survival rate below 54%.<n>We show that agents that leverage "Universalization"-based reasoning, a theory of moral thinking, are able to achieve significantly better sustainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T15:59:16Z)
• Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View [60.80731090755224]
  This paper probes the collaboration mechanisms among contemporary NLP systems by practical experiments with theoretical insights. We fabricate four unique societies' comprised of LLM agents, where each agent is characterized by a specific trait' (easy-going or overconfident) and engages in collaboration with a distinct thinking pattern' (debate or reflection) Our results further illustrate that LLM agents manifest human-like social behaviors, such as conformity and consensus reaching, mirroring social psychology theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T15:05:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.