AdversarialCoT: Single-Document Retrieval Poisoning for LLM Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12201v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 02:10:23 GMT
• Title: AdversarialCoT: Single-Document Retrieval Poisoning for LLM Reasoning
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language model (LLM) reasoning by retrieving external documents.<n>We study knowledge-base poisoning attacks in RAG, where an attacker injects malicious content into the retrieval corpus.<n>We propose AdversarialCoT, a query-specific attack that poisons only a single document in the corpus.
• Score: 115.3243260783674
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language model (LLM) reasoning by retrieving external documents, but also opens up new attack surfaces. We study knowledge-base poisoning attacks in RAG, where an attacker injects malicious content into the retrieval corpus, which is then naturally surfaced by the retriever and consumed by the LLM during reasoning. Unlike prior work that floods the corpus with poisoned documents, we propose AdversarialCoT, a query-specific attack that poisons only a single document in the corpus. AdversarialCoT first extracts the target LLM's reasoning framework to guide the construction of an initial adversarial chain-of-thought (CoT). The adversarial document is iteratively refined through interactions with the LLM, progressively exposing and exploiting critical reasoning vulnerabilities. Experiments on benchmark LLMs show that a single adversarial document can significantly degrade reasoning accuracy, revealing subtle yet impactful weaknesses. This study exposes security risks in RAG systems and provides actionable insights for designing more robust LLM reasoning pipelines.

Related papers

• InceptionRAG: Stealthy Poisoning Attack Against Retrieval-Augmented Generation [23.65420330011369]
  We introduce InceptionRAG, a stealthy attack mechanism that subverts the standard attack paradigm.<n>InceptionRAG achieves an attack success rate exceeding 80% even under rigorous adversarial constraints.<n>Our findings expose a concerning paradox: the stronger reasoning capabilities of LLMs increase their vulnerability to reasoning-based poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-15T08:22:10Z)
• Steering LLM Viewpoints through Fabricated Evidence Injection [61.22850755490993]
  We introduce a two-phase attack framework that first repackages misleading statements with fabricated rationales, then instruct target LLMs to incorporate these viewpoints when responding to relevant queries.<n>Experiments on BBQ, ToxiGen, and our specialized dataset reveal that commercial LLMs without external safety classifiers remain highly vulnerable.<n>Building on this, we explore multiple defense strategies, among which a tailored safety policy enablesgpt-oss-safeguard to achieve 81% detection rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T14:48:23Z)
• Addressing Corpus Knowledge Poisoning Attacks on RAG Using Sparse Attention [10.71610316323851]
  We introduce a novel defense approach for RAG: Sparse Document Attention RAG (SDAG)<n> SDAG is a block-sparse attention mechanism that disallows cross-attention between retrieved documents.<n>We show that our SDAG method substantially outperforms the standard causal attention mechanism in terms of attack success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T16:22:20Z)
• "Someone Hid It": Query-Agnostic Black-Box Attacks on LLM-Based Retrieval [44.49026453970601]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been serving as effective backbones for retrieval systems.<n>Recent studies have demonstrated that such LLM-based Retrieval is vulnerable to adversarial attacks.<n>We propose a practical black-box attack method that generates transferable injection tokens based on zero-shot surrogate LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T22:28:04Z)
• Paper Summary Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs through LLM Safety Papers [61.57691030102618]
  We propose a novel jailbreaking method, Paper Summary Attack (llmnamePSA)<n>It synthesizes content from either attack-focused or defense-focused LLM safety paper to construct an adversarial prompt template.<n>Experiments show significant vulnerabilities not only in base LLMs, but also in state-of-the-art reasoning model like Deepseek-R1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T18:33:50Z)
• Revisiting Backdoor Attacks on LLMs: A Stealthy and Practical Poisoning Framework via Harmless Inputs [54.90315421117162]
  We propose a novel poisoning method via completely harmless data.<n>Inspired by the causal reasoning in auto-regressive LLMs, we aim to establish robust associations between triggers and an affirmative response prefix.<n>We observe an interesting resistance phenomenon where the LLM initially appears to agree but subsequently refuses to answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T08:13:59Z)
• One Shot Dominance: Knowledge Poisoning Attack on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [28.06028279729382]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) enhanced with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) have shown improved performance in generating accurate responses.<n> dependence on external knowledge bases introduces potential security vulnerabilities.<n>This paper reveals a more realistic knowledge poisoning attack against RAG systems that achieves successful attacks by poisoning only a single document.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T08:14:58Z)
• Towards Copyright Protection for Knowledge Bases of Retrieval-augmented Language Models via Reasoning [58.57194301645823]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into real-world personalized applications.<n>The valuable and often proprietary nature of the knowledge bases used in RAG introduces the risk of unauthorized usage by adversaries.<n>Existing methods that can be generalized as watermarking techniques to protect these knowledge bases typically involve poisoning or backdoor attacks.<n>We propose name for harmless' copyright protection of knowledge bases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T09:15:56Z)
• Illusions of Relevance: Using Content Injection Attacks to Deceive Retrievers, Rerankers, and LLM Judges [52.96987928118327]
  We find that embedding models for retrieval, rerankers, and large language model (LLM) relevance judges are vulnerable to content injection attacks.<n>We identify two primary threats: (1) inserting unrelated or harmful content within passages that still appear deceptively "relevant", and (2) inserting entire queries or key query terms into passages to boost their perceived relevance.<n>Our study systematically examines the factors that influence an attack's success, such as the placement of injected content and the balance between relevant and non-relevant material.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T18:02:15Z)
• Towards More Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Evaluating RAG Under Adversarial Poisoning Attacks [45.07581174558107]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have emerged as a promising solution to mitigate hallucinations.<n>RAG systems are vulnerable to adversarial poisoning attacks, where malicious passages injected into the retrieval corpus can mislead models into producing factually incorrect outputs.<n>We present a rigorously controlled empirical study of how RAG systems behave under such attacks and how their robustness can be improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-21T17:31:52Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities.<n>Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content.<n>We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.