Frontier-Eng: Benchmarking Self-Evolving Agents on Real-World Engineering Tasks with Generative Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12290v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 05:02:06 GMT
• Title: Frontier-Eng: Benchmarking Self-Evolving Agents on Real-World Engineering Tasks with Generative Optimization
• Abstract summary: We introduce Frontier-Eng, a human-verified benchmark for generative optimization.<n>Unlike previous suites, Frontier-Eng tasks are grounded in industrial-grade simulators and verifiers.<n>We evaluate eight frontier language models using representative search frameworks.
• Score: 16.92885982726064
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Current LLM agent benchmarks, which predominantly focus on binary pass/fail tasks such as code generation or search-based question answering, often neglect the value of real-world engineering that is often captured through the iterative optimization of feasible designs. To this end, we introduce Frontier-Eng, a human-verified benchmark for generative optimization -- an iterative propose-execute-evaluate loop in which an agent generates candidate artifacts, receives executable verifier feedback, and revises them under a fixed interaction budget -- spanning $47$ tasks across five broad engineering categories. Unlike previous suites, Frontier-Eng tasks are grounded in industrial-grade simulators and verifiers that provide continuous reward signals and enforce hard feasibility constraints under constrained budgets. We evaluate eight frontier language models using representative search frameworks, finding that while Claude 4.6 Opus achieves the most robust performance, the benchmark remains challenging for all models. Our analysis suggests a dual power-law decay in improvement frequency ($\sim$ 1/iteration) and magnitude ($\sim$ 1/improvement count). We further show that although width improves parallelism and diversity, depth remains crucial for hard-won improvements under a fixed budget. Frontier-Eng establishes a new standard for assessing the capacity of AI agents to integrate domain knowledge with executable feedback to solve complex, open-ended engineering problems.

Related papers

• Online Surrogate Repair: Decoupling High-Fidelity Feedback from Search Length in Closed-Loop Discovery [24.4458458394035]
  We propose emphonline surrogate repair (OSR), a closed-loop algorithm that uses sparse high-fidelity evaluations to update the surrogate throughout a longer agent search.<n>An acquisition rule selects which designs from the agent's accumulated proposals receive high-fidelity evaluation, and the resulting labels update the surrogate used in subsequent episodes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T15:42:45Z)
• AutoLab: Can Frontier Models Solve Long-Horizon Auto Research and Engineering Tasks? [84.49732367417067]
  We introduce AutoLab, a new benchmark for ultra long-horizon closed-loop optimization.<n>AutoLab consists of 36 realistic, expert-curated tasks spanning four diverse domains.<n>We open-source the full benchmark, evaluation harness, and task artifacts, to accelerate research toward truly capable long-horizon agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T16:36:54Z)
• OccuBench: Evaluating AI Agents on Real-World Professional Tasks via Language World Models [57.505743202759646]
  OccuBench is a benchmark covering 100 real-world professional task scenarios across 10 industry categories and 65 specialized domains.<n>Our multi-agent synthesis pipeline automatically produces evaluation instances with guaranteed solvability, calibrated difficulty, and document-grounded diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T00:27:32Z)
• KARL: Knowledge Agents via Reinforcement Learning [63.627906947205624]
  We present a system for training enterprise search agents via reinforcement learning.<n> KARLBench is a multi-capability evaluation suite spanning six distinct search regimes.<n>We show that models trained across heterogeneous search behaviors generalize substantially better than those optimized for any single benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T14:30:25Z)
• BeyondSWE: Can Current Code Agent Survive Beyond Single-Repo Bug Fixing? [61.247730037229815]
  We introduce BeyondSWE, a comprehensive benchmark that broadens existing evaluations along two axes - resolution scope and knowledge scope.<n>To investigate the role of external knowledge, we develop SearchSWE, a framework that integrates deep search with coding abilities.<n>This work offers both a realistic, challenging evaluation benchmark and a flexible framework to advance research toward more capable code agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T17:52:01Z)
• EmboCoach-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Developing Embodied Robots [68.29056647487519]
  Embodied AI is fueled by high-fidelity simulation and large-scale data collection.<n>However, this scaling capability remains bottlenecked by a reliance on labor-intensive manual oversight.<n>We introduce textscEmboCoach-Bench, a benchmark evaluating the capacity of LLM agents to autonomously engineer embodied policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T11:33:49Z)
• OPT-Engine: Benchmarking the Limits of LLMs in Optimization Modeling via Complexity Scaling [13.57588221678224]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive progress in optimization modeling.<n>The boundaries of their capabilities in automated formulation and problem solving remain poorly understood.<n>We propose OPT-ENGINE, a benchmark framework designed to evaluate LLMs on optimization modeling with controllable and scalable difficulty levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T09:22:33Z)
• Benchmarking Generative AI Against Bayesian Optimization for Constrained Multi-Objective Inverse Design [0.15293427903448018]
  This paper investigates the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) as generative feasibles for solving constrained multi-objective regression tasks.<n>The best-performing LLM (Math-7B) achieved a Generational Distance (GD) of 1.21, significantly outperforming the traditional BoTorch Ax baseline.<n>The findings have direct industrial applications in optimizing formulation design for resins, rheological, and chemical properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T10:37:09Z)
• NatureGAIA: Pushing the Frontiers of GUI Agents with a Challenging Benchmark and High-Quality Trajectory Dataset [16.676904484703]
  We introduce NaturalGAIA, a novel benchmark engineered on the principle of Causal Pathways.<n>This paradigm structures complex tasks into a series of verifiable atomic steps, ensuring rigorous, fully automated, and reproducible standard for assessment.<n>We then utilize this dataset to perform Reinforcement FineTuning (RFT) on the Q2.5-VL-7B model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T11:53:41Z)
• When Demonstrations Meet Generative World Models: A Maximum Likelihood Framework for Offline Inverse Reinforcement Learning [62.00672284480755]
  This paper aims to recover the structure of rewards and environment dynamics that underlie observed actions in a fixed, finite set of demonstrations from an expert agent. Accurate models of expertise in executing a task has applications in safety-sensitive applications such as clinical decision making and autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T04:14:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.