Analyzing the Effect of Noise in LLM Fine-tuning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12469v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:54:49 GMT
• Title: Analyzing the Effect of Noise in LLM Fine-tuning
• Abstract summary: We study the impact of noise on model behavior across three pretrained model families and three diverse NLP tasks.<n>We introduce controlled perturbations corresponding to three common real-world noise types: label noise, grammatical noise, and typographical noise.<n>Our results show that corrupting labels consistently causes the largest performance degradation, whereas grammatical noise and typographical noise can occasionally yield mild regularization benefits.
• Score: 8.326903332564365
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Fine-tuning is the dominant paradigm for adapting pretrained large language models (LLMs) to downstream NLP tasks. In practice, fine-tuning datasets may contain various forms of noise arising from annotation errors, preprocessing artifacts, or automated data collection. While prior work has focused on designing robust learning algorithms to mitigate performance degradation under noisy conditions, comparatively little is known about how different types of noise affect the internal learning dynamics of LLMs during fine-tuning. In this work, we systematically study the impact of noise on model behavior across three pretrained model families (GPT-2, Qwen2 and Llama-2) and three diverse NLP tasks. We introduce controlled perturbations corresponding to three common real-world noise types: label noise, grammatical noise, and typographical noise. Beyond task-level performance, we analyze layer-wise representation changes and attention patterns to understand how noise propagates through the network. Our results show that corrupting labels (i.e. label noise) consistently causes the largest performance degradation, whereas grammatical noise and typographical noise can occasionally yield mild regularization benefits. We further find that noise effects are localized primarily to task-specific layers, while attention structures remain comparatively stable.

Related papers

• Noise-Robust Tiny Object Localization with Flows [63.60972031108944]
  We propose a noise-robust localization framework leveraging normalizing flows for flexible error modeling and uncertainty-guided optimization.<n>Our method captures complex, non-Gaussian prediction distributions through flow-based error modeling, enabling robust learning under noisy supervision.<n>An uncertainty-aware gradient modulation mechanism further suppresses learning from high-uncertainty, noise-prone samples, mitigating overfitting while stabilizing training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-02T09:16:55Z)
• MANTRA: a Framework for Multi-stage Adaptive Noise TReAtment During Training [3.619444603816032]
  Large-scale repositories introduce noisy or mislabeled examples that degrade both accuracy and robustness.<n>We propose MANTRA, a Multi-stage Adaptive Noise TReAtment framework that embeds noise diagnosis and mitigation directly into the fine-tuning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T23:09:55Z)
• Mitigating the Noise Shift for Denoising Generative Models via Noise Awareness Guidance [54.88271057438763]
  Noise Awareness Guidance (NAG) is a correction method that explicitly steers sampling trajectories to remain consistent with the pre-defined noise schedule.<n>NAG consistently mitigates noise shift and substantially improves the generation quality of mainstream diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T13:31:34Z)
• Enhance Vision-Language Alignment with Noise [59.2608298578913]
  We investigate whether the frozen model can be fine-tuned by customized noise.<n>We propose Positive-incentive Noise (PiNI) which can fine-tune CLIP via injecting noise into both visual and text encoders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-14T12:58:15Z)
• NoiseBench: Benchmarking the Impact of Real Label Noise on Named Entity Recognition [3.726602636064681]
  We present an analysis that shows that real noise is significantly more challenging than simulated noise. We show that current state-of-the-art models for noise-robust learning fall far short of their theoretically achievable upper bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T10:20:31Z)
• Impact of Noisy Supervision in Foundation Model Learning [91.56591923244943]
  This paper is the first work to comprehensively understand and analyze the nature of noise in pre-training datasets.<n>We propose a tuning method (NMTune) to affine the feature space to mitigate the malignant effect of noise and improve generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T16:22:41Z)
• Understanding the Effect of Noise in LLM Training Data with Algorithmic Chains of Thought [0.0]
  We study how noise in chain of thought impacts task performance in highly-controlled setting. We define two types of noise: textitstatic noise, a local form of noise which is applied after the CoT trace is computed, and textitdynamic noise, a global form of noise which propagates errors in the trace as it is computed. We find fine-tuned models are extremely robust to high levels of static noise but struggle significantly more with lower levels of dynamic noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T13:59:56Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating the Label Noise in Pre-training on Downstream Tasks [91.15120211190519]
  This paper aims to understand the nature of noise in pre-training datasets and to mitigate its impact on downstream tasks. We propose a light-weight black-box tuning method (NMTune) to affine the feature space to mitigate the malignant effect of noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T06:18:15Z)
• An Investigation of Noise in Morphological Inflection [21.411766936034]
  We investigate the types of noise encountered within a pipeline for truly unsupervised morphological paradigm completion. We compare the effect of different types of noise on multiple state-of-the-art inflection models. We propose a novel character-level masked language modeling (CMLM) pretraining objective and explore its impact on the models' resistance to noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T02:14:34Z)
• NLIP: Noise-robust Language-Image Pre-training [95.13287735264937]
  We propose a principled Noise-robust Language-Image Pre-training framework (NLIP) to stabilize pre-training via two schemes: noise-harmonization and noise-completion. Our NLIP can alleviate the common noise effects during image-text pre-training in a more efficient way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T08:19:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.