Probabilistic Feature Imputation and Uncertainty-Aware Multimodal Federated Aggregation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12970v1
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:03:14 GMT
- Title: Probabilistic Feature Imputation and Uncertainty-Aware Multimodal Federated Aggregation
- Abstract summary: Probabilistic Feature Imputation Network produces uncertainty estimates alongside imputed features.<n>Experiments on federated chest X-ray classification using CheXpert, NIH Open-I, and PadChest demonstrate consistent improvements over deterministic baselines.
- Score: 0.2283362795949404
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Multimodal federated learning enables privacy-preserving collaborative model training across healthcare institutions. However, a fundamental challenge arises from modality heterogeneity: many clinical sites possess only a subset of modalities due to resource constraints or workflow variations. Existing approaches address this through feature imputation networks that synthesize missing modality representations, yet these methods produce point estimates without reliability measures, forcing downstream classifiers to treat all imputed features as equally trustworthy. In safety-critical medical applications, this limitation poses significant risks. We propose the Probabilistic Feature Imputation Network (P-FIN), which outputs calibrated uncertainty estimates alongside imputed features. This uncertainty is leveraged at two levels: (1) locally, through sigmoid gating that attenuates unreliable feature dimensions before classification, and (2) globally, through Fed-UQ-Avg, an aggregation strategy that prioritizes updates from clients with reliable imputation. Experiments on federated chest X-ray classification using CheXpert, NIH Open-I, and PadChest demonstrate consistent improvements over deterministic baselines, with +5.36% AUC gain in the most challenging configuration.
Related papers
- Conformal Changepoint Localization and Root Cause Analysis with Corrupted Observations [55.76952683833966]
This paper proposes weighted CONCH (W-CONCH) and weighted CROC (W-CROC) to reduce confidence set size when data may be corrupted.<n>Experiments on image-based and real-world changepoint and root-cause benchmarks show that uncertainty-based weighting substantially reduces confidence set size.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-29T05:16:59Z) - Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z) - TrustFed: Enabling Trustworthy Medical AI under Data Privacy Constraints [2.9567293946666173]
Federated learning can enable privacy-preserving, multi-institutional training without sharing raw patient data.<n>TrustFed provides distribution-free, finite-sample coverage guarantees under heterogeneous and imbalanced healthcare data.<n>We conduct one of the most comprehensive evaluations of uncertainty-aware federated learning in medical imaging.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T07:34:45Z) - CUPID: A Plug-in Framework for Joint Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Estimation with a Single Model [1.6855257501750571]
CUPID (Comprehensive Uncertainty Plug-in estImation moDel) is a general-purpose module that jointly estimates aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty without modifying or retraining the base model.<n>We evaluate CUPID across a range of tasks, including classification, regression, and out-of-distribution detection.<n>The results show that CUPID consistently delivers competitive performance while offering layer-wise insights into the origins of uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T13:18:10Z) - Open-World Deepfake Attribution via Confidence-Aware Asymmetric Learning [78.92934995292113]
We propose a Confidence-Aware Asymmetric Learning (CAL) framework, which balances confidence across known and novel forgery types.<n>CAL consistently outperforms previous methods, achieving new state-of-the-art performance on both known and novel forgery attribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-14T12:31:28Z) - Conformal Prediction for Multi-Source Detection on a Network [59.17729745907474]
We study the multi-source detection problem.<n>Given snapshot observations of node infection status on a graph, estimate the set of source nodes that initiated the propagation.<n>We propose a novel conformal prediction framework that provides statistically valid recall guarantees for source set detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-12T01:09:56Z) - Adaptive Federated Few-Shot Rare-Disease Diagnosis with Energy-Aware Secure Aggregation [0.0]
This paper proposes the Adaptive Federated Few-Shot Rare-Disease Diagnosis framework.<n>It integrates few-shot federated optimization with meta-learning to generalize from limited patient samples.<n>Trials show up to 10% improvement in accuracy compared with baseline FL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T14:52:07Z) - Uncertainty-driven Embedding Convolution [16.523816971857787]
We propose Uncertainty-driven Embedding Convolution (UEC)<n>UEC transforms deterministic embeddings into probabilistic ones in a post-hoc manner.<n>It then computes adaptive ensemble weights based on embedding uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T11:15:25Z) - COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z) - Likelihood Ratio Confidence Sets for Sequential Decision Making [51.66638486226482]
We revisit the likelihood-based inference principle and propose to use likelihood ratios to construct valid confidence sequences.
Our method is especially suitable for problems with well-specified likelihoods.
We show how to provably choose the best sequence of estimators and shed light on connections to online convex optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-08T00:10:21Z) - Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Modeling Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [57.023423137202485]
Concerns regarding the reliability of medical image segmentation persist among clinicians.<n>We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.<n>By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for medical image segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.