Out of Context: Reliability in Multimodal Anomaly Detection Requires Contextual Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13252v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 19:32:55 GMT
• Title: Out of Context: Reliability in Multimodal Anomaly Detection Requires Contextual Inference
• Abstract summary: We argue that multimodal anomaly detection should be reframed as a cross-modal contextual inference problem.<n>This perspective has implications for model design, evaluation protocols, and benchmark construction.
• Score: 54.774686416991386
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Anomaly detection aims to identify observations that deviate from expected behavior. Because anomalous events are inherently sparse, most frameworks are trained exclusively on normal data to learn a single reference model of normality. This implicitly assumes that normal behavior can be captured by a single, unconditional reference distribution. In practice, however, anomalies are often context-dependent: A specific observation may be normal under one operating condition, yet anomalous under another. As machine learning systems are deployed in dynamic and heterogeneous environments, these fixed-context assumptions introduce structural ambiguity, i.e., the inability to distinguish contextual variation from genuine abnormality under marginal modeling, leading to unstable performance and unreliable anomaly assessments. While modern sensing systems frequently collect multimodal data capturing complementary aspects of both system behavior and operating conditions, existing methods treat all data streams equally, without distinguishing contextual information from anomaly-relevant signals. As a result, abnormality is often evaluated without explicitly conditioning on operating conditions. We argue that multimodal anomaly detection should be reframed as a cross-modal contextual inference problem, in which modalities play asymmetric roles, separating context from observation, to define abnormality conditionally rather than relative to a single global reference. This perspective has implications for model design, evaluation protocols, and benchmark construction, and outline open research challenges toward robust, context-aware multimodal anomaly detection.

Related papers

• Learning Unified Representations of Normalcy for Time Series Anomaly Detection [0.0]
  In this paper, we present a novel framework, Unified Unsupervised Anomaly Detection ($textU2textAD$)<n>Our approach learns the underlying data distribution of normal samples by utilizing score-based generative modeling.<n>Our experimental evaluations demonstrate that $textU2textAD$ not only outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in detection accuracy but also identifies anomalies at significantly earlier stages of their occurrence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T18:12:22Z)
• Multi-Cue Anomaly Detection and Localization under Data Contamination [0.6703429330486276]
  We propose a robust anomaly detection framework that integrates limited anomaly supervision into the adaptive deviation learning paradigm.<n>Our framework achieves strong detection and localization performance, interpretability, and robustness under various levels of data contamination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T12:34:13Z)
• When Anomalies Depend on Context: Learning Conditional Compatibility for Anomaly Detection [15.88746061477275]
  Anomaly detection is often formulated under the assumption that abnormality is an intrinsic property of an observation, independent of context.<n>This assumption breaks down in many real-world settings, where the same object or action may be normal or anomalous depending on latent contextual factors.<n>We revisit emphcontextual anomaly detection, classically defined as context-dependent abnormality, and operationalize it in the visual domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T11:48:20Z)
• Two Is Better Than One: Aligned Representation Pairs for Anomaly Detection [56.57122939745213]
  Anomaly detection focuses on identifying samples that deviate from the norm.<n>Recent self-supervised methods have successfully learned such representations by employing prior knowledge about anomalies to create synthetic outliers during training.<n>We address this limitation with our new approach Con$$, which leverages prior knowledge about symmetries in normal samples to observe the data in different contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T07:59:06Z)
• Causality-Based Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection [63.799474860969156]
  We formulate the anomaly detection problem from a causal perspective and view anomalies as instances that do not follow the regular causal mechanism to generate the multivariate data. We then propose a causality-based anomaly detection approach, which first learns the causal structure from data and then infers whether an instance is an anomaly relative to the local causal mechanism. We evaluate our approach with both simulated and public datasets as well as a case study on real-world AIOps applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T06:00:13Z)
• Catching Both Gray and Black Swans: Open-set Supervised Anomaly Detection [90.32910087103744]
  A few labeled anomaly examples are often available in many real-world applications. These anomaly examples provide valuable knowledge about the application-specific abnormality. Those anomalies seen during training often do not illustrate every possible class of anomaly. This paper tackles open-set supervised anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-28T05:21:37Z)
• Explainable Deep Few-shot Anomaly Detection with Deviation Networks [123.46611927225963]
  We introduce a novel weakly-supervised anomaly detection framework to train detection models. The proposed approach learns discriminative normality by leveraging the labeled anomalies and a prior probability. Our model is substantially more sample-efficient and robust, and performs significantly better than state-of-the-art competing methods in both closed-set and open-set settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-01T14:33:17Z)
• Toward Deep Supervised Anomaly Detection: Reinforcement Learning from Partially Labeled Anomaly Data [150.9270911031327]
  We consider the problem of anomaly detection with a small set of partially labeled anomaly examples and a large-scale unlabeled dataset. Existing related methods either exclusively fit the limited anomaly examples that typically do not span the entire set of anomalies, or proceed with unsupervised learning from the unlabeled data. We propose here instead a deep reinforcement learning-based approach that enables an end-to-end optimization of the detection of both labeled and unlabeled anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-15T03:05:39Z)
• Deep Weakly-supervised Anomaly Detection [118.55172352231381]
  Pairwise Relation prediction Network (PReNet) learns pairwise relation features and anomaly scores. PReNet can detect any seen/unseen abnormalities that fit the learned pairwise abnormal patterns. Empirical results on 12 real-world datasets show that PReNet significantly outperforms nine competing methods in detecting seen and unseen anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-10-30T00:40:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.