Seek-and-Solve: Benchmarking MLLMs for Visual Clue-Driven Reasoning in Daily Scenarios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14041v2
• Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:14:13 GMT
• Title: Seek-and-Solve: Benchmarking MLLMs for Visual Clue-Driven Reasoning in Daily Scenarios
• Abstract summary: DailyClue is a benchmark designed for visual clue-driven reasoning in daily scenarios.<n>Our construction is guided by two core principles: (1) strict grounding in authentic daily activities, and (2) challenging query design.<n>Our analysis reveals several critical insights, emphasizing that the accurate identification of visual clues is essential for robust reasoning.
• Score: 56.703500104126014
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Daily scenarios are characterized by visual richness, requiring Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to filter noise and identify decisive visual clues for accurate reasoning. Yet, current benchmarks predominantly aim at evaluating MLLMs' pre-existing knowledge or perceptual understanding, often neglecting the critical capability of reasoning. To bridge this gap, we introduce DailyClue, a benchmark designed for visual clue-driven reasoning in daily scenarios. Our construction is guided by two core principles: (1) strict grounding in authentic daily activities, and (2) challenging query design that necessitates more than surface-level perception. Instead of simple recognition, our questions compel MLLMs to actively explore suitable visual clues and leverage them for subsequent reasoning. To this end, we curate a comprehensive dataset spanning four major daily domains and 16 distinct subtasks. Comprehensive evaluation across MLLMs and agentic models underscores the formidable challenge posed by our benchmark. Our analysis reveals several critical insights, emphasizing that the accurate identification of visual clues is essential for robust reasoning.

Related papers

• Symbolic and Abstractive Reasoning with Complex Visual Queries [57.59111649292774]
  We explore a novel abstract data type termed complex visual query (CVQ)<n>CVQ probes symbolic and abstractive reasoning, which is a critical yet underexplored dimension of human-like neuro-symbolic reasoning for MLLMs.<n>We introduce a two-stage training framework that progressively equips MLLMs with robust visual reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T08:30:51Z)
• VER-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Reasoning with Fine-Grained Visual Evidence [34.88628187460859]
  VER-Bench is a novel framework to evaluate MLLMs' ability to identify fine-grained visual clues.<n>Each question in VER-Bench is accompanied by structured evidence: visual clues and question-related reasoning derived from them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T19:59:42Z)
• MMReason: An Open-Ended Multi-Modal Multi-Step Reasoning Benchmark for MLLMs Toward AGI [59.196131618912005]
  Reasoning plays a crucial role in advancing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>Existing MLLM benchmarks often fall short in precisely and comprehensively evaluating long-chain reasoning abilities.<n>We introduce MMReason, a new benchmark designed to precisely and comprehensively evaluate MLLM long-chain reasoning capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T07:14:38Z)
• Can MLLMs Guide Me Home? A Benchmark Study on Fine-Grained Visual Reasoning from Transit Maps [56.76175383189738]
  We introduce ReasonMap, a benchmark designed to assess the fine-grained visual understanding and spatial reasoning abilities of MLLMs.<n>ReasonMap encompasses high-resolution transit maps from 30 cities across 13 countries and includes 1,008 question-answer pairs spanning two question types and three templates.<n> Comprehensive evaluations of 15 popular MLLMs, including both base and reasoning variants, reveal a counterintuitive pattern.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T12:33:52Z)
• Seeing from Another Perspective: Evaluating Multi-View Understanding in MLLMs [41.072699990427374]
  Multi-view understanding is a fundamental challenge in Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to be used as embodied agents.<n>We propose All-Angles Bench, a benchmark of over 2,100 human carefully annotated multi-view question-answer pairs across 90 real-world scenes.<n>Our experiments, benchmark on 27 representative MLLMs including Gemini-2.0-Flash, Claude-3.7-Sonnet, and GPT-4o against human evaluators reveals a substantial performance gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T17:59:53Z)
• VERIFY: A Benchmark of Visual Explanation and Reasoning for Investigating Multimodal Reasoning Fidelity [34.29409506366145]
  VERIFY is a benchmark designed to isolate and rigorously evaluate the visual reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art MLLMs.<n>Each problem is accompanied by a human-annotated reasoning path, making it the first to provide in-depth evaluation of model decision-making processes.<n>We propose novel metrics that assess visual reasoning fidelity beyond mere accuracy, highlighting critical imbalances in current model reasoning patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T16:26:11Z)
• VOILA: Evaluation of MLLMs For Perceptual Understanding and Analogical Reasoning [63.0285363282581]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become a powerful tool for integrating visual and textual information.<n>We introduce VOILA, a benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' perceptual understanding and abstract relational reasoning.<n>We reveal that current MLLMs struggle to comprehend inter-image relationships and exhibit limited capabilities in high-level relational reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T23:36:19Z)
• Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs [65.93003087656754]
  VisFactor is a benchmark that digitizes 20 vision-centric subtests from a well-established cognitive psychology assessment.<n>We evaluate 20 frontier Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) from GPT, Gemini, Claude, LLaMA, Qwen, and SEED families.<n>The best-performing model achieves a score of only 25.19 out of 100, with consistent failures on tasks such as mental rotation, spatial relation inference, and figure-ground discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T04:21:32Z)
• EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents [63.43699771428243]
  EmbodiedBench is an extensive benchmark designed to evaluate vision-driven embodied agents.<n>We evaluated 24 leading proprietary and open-source MLLMs within EmbodiedBench.<n> MLLMs excel at high-level tasks but struggle with low-level manipulation, with the best model, GPT-4o, scoring only 28.9% on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T18:11:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.