Uncertainty, Vagueness, and Ambiguity in Human-Robot Interaction: Why Conceptualization Matters

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15339v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 11:46:25 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty, Vagueness, and Ambiguity in Human-Robot Interaction: Why Conceptualization Matters
• Abstract summary: Uncertainty, vagueness, and ambiguity are closely related and often confused concepts in human robot interaction (HRI)<n>In earlier studies, these concepts have been defined in contradictory ways and described using inconsistent terminology.<n>This paper proposes a consistent conceptual foundation for the challenges of uncertainty, vagueness, and ambiguity in HRI.
• Score: 11.65060182964011
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Uncertainty, vagueness, and ambiguity are closely related and often confused concepts in human-robot interaction (HRI). In earlier studies, these concepts have been defined in contradictory ways and described using inconsistent terminology. This conceptual confusion and lack of terminological consistency undermine empirical comparability, thereby slowing the accumulation of theory. Consequently, consistent concepts that clarify these challenges, including their definitions, distinctions, and interrelationships, are needed in HRI. To address this lack of clarity, this paper proposes a consistent conceptual foundation for the challenges of uncertainty, vagueness, and ambiguity in HRI. First, we examine the meanings of these three terms in dictionaries. We then analyze the nature of their distinctions and interrelationships within the context of HRI. We further illustrate these characteristics through examples. Finally, we demonstrate how this consistent conceptual foundation facilitates the design of novel methods and the evaluation of existing methodologies for these phenomena.

Related papers

• Towards a Foundational Ontology for Identifying and Resolving Contradictions in Dialogue-based Human-Robot Interactions [0.0]
  There is still lack of a formal computational framework to represent and define contradictions in HRI and human-agent interaction domains.<n>This research project aims to capture, represent, and evaluate the notion of dialogue-based interaction and related contradictions in an ontology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-02T09:35:02Z)
• Concept frustration: Aligning human concepts and machine representations [39.50576817657001]
  We introduce a framework for comparing supervised human concepts with unsupervised intermediate representations extracted from foundation model embeddings.<n>Motivated by the role of conceptual leaps in scientific discovery, we formalise the notion of concept frustration.<n>We develop task-aligned similarity measures that detect concept frustration between supervised concept-based models and unsupervised representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T12:17:21Z)
• A Geometric Unification of Concept Learning with Concept Cones [58.70836885177496]
  Two traditions of interpretability have evolved side by side but seldom spoken to each other: Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) and Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs)<n>We show that both paradigms instantiate the same geometric structure.<n>CBMs provide human-defined reference geometries, while SAEs can be evaluated by how well their learned cones approximate or contain those of CBMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T09:51:46Z)
• From Tokens to Thoughts: How LLMs and Humans Trade Compression for Meaning [63.25540801694765]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate striking linguistic abilities, yet whether they achieve this same balance remains unclear.<n>We apply the Information Bottleneck principle to quantitatively compare how LLMs and humans navigate this compression-meaning trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T16:29:00Z)
• Prioritization First, Principles Second: An Adaptive Interpretation of Helpful, Honest, and Harmless Principles [30.405680322319242]
  The Helpful, Honest, and Harmless (HHH) principle is a framework for aligning AI systems with human values.<n>We argue for an adaptive interpretation of the HHH principle and propose a reference framework for its adaptation to diverse scenarios.<n>This work offers practical insights for improving AI alignment, ensuring that HHH principles remain both grounded and operationally effective in real-world AI deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T22:41:24Z)
• Revealing emergent human-like conceptual representations from language prediction [90.73285317321312]
  Large language models (LLMs) trained solely through next-token prediction on text exhibit strikingly human-like behaviors.<n>Are these models developing concepts akin to those of humans?<n>We found that LLMs can flexibly derive concepts from linguistic descriptions in relation to contextual cues about other concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T23:54:17Z)
• On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directions [62.06913340614293]
  This paper proposes a categorization of different types of conceptualizations into four levels based on the types of instances being conceptualized.<n>We present the first comprehensive survey of over 150 papers, surveying various definitions, resources, methods, and downstream applications related to conceptualization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T10:32:41Z)
• Interpretability is in the Mind of the Beholder: A Causal Framework for Human-interpretable Representation Learning [22.201878275784246]
  Focus in Explainable AI is shifting from explanations defined in terms of low-level elements, such as input features, to explanations encoded in terms of interpretable concepts learned from data. How to reliably acquire such concepts is, however, still fundamentally unclear. We propose a mathematical framework for acquiring interpretable representations suitable for both post-hoc explainers and concept-based neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T14:26:20Z)
• A Category-theoretical Meta-analysis of Definitions of Disentanglement [97.34033555407403]
  Disentangling the factors of variation in data is a fundamental concept in machine learning. This paper presents a meta-analysis of existing definitions of disentanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T15:24:20Z)
• Interpretable Neural-Symbolic Concept Reasoning [7.1904050674791185]
  Concept-based models aim to address this issue by learning tasks based on a set of human-understandable concepts. We propose the Deep Concept Reasoner (DCR), the first interpretable concept-based model that builds upon concept embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T09:58:15Z)
• On the Faithfulness Measurements for Model Interpretations [100.2730234575114]
  Post-hoc interpretations aim to uncover how natural language processing (NLP) models make predictions. To tackle these issues, we start with three criteria: the removal-based criterion, the sensitivity of interpretations, and the stability of interpretations. Motivated by the desideratum of these faithfulness notions, we introduce a new class of interpretation methods that adopt techniques from the adversarial domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T09:19:44Z)
• Aligning Faithful Interpretations with their Social Attribution [58.13152510843004]
  We find that the requirement of model interpretations to be faithful is vague and incomplete. We identify that the problem is a misalignment between the causal chain of decisions (causal attribution) and the attribution of human behavior to the interpretation (social attribution)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T16:45:38Z)
• On the Merging of Domain-Specific Heterogeneous Ontologies using Wordnet and Web Pattern-based Queries [0.0]
  We aim at providing a formal, explicit and shared conceptualization and understanding of common domains between different communities. Ontologies allow for concepts and their constraints of a specific domain to be explicitly defined.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T05:03:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.