Towards A Framework for Levels of Anthropomorphic Deception in Robots and AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15418v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:56:11 GMT
• Title: Towards A Framework for Levels of Anthropomorphic Deception in Robots and AI
• Abstract summary: We propose a framework with four levels of anthropomorphic deception.<n>These levels are defined and distinguished by three factors: humanlikeness, agency, and selfhood.<n>We hope to promote a balanced view on anthropomorphic deception by design that should be neither nave (e.g., as a default) nor exploitive (e.g., for economic benefit)
• Score: 2.60156334005907
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents a preliminary draft of a framework around the use of anthropomorphic deception, defined here as misleading users towards humanlike affordances in the design of autonomous systems. The goal is to promote reflection among HCI and HRI researchers, as well as industry practitioners, to think about levels of anthropomorphic design that are: a) functionally necessary, b) socially appropriate, and c) ethically permissible for their use case. By reviewing the relevant literature on deception in HCI and HRI, we propose a framework with four levels of anthropomorphic deception. These levels are defined and distinguished by three factors: humanlikeness, agency, and selfhood. Example use cases at each level illustrate considerations around their functional, social, and ethical permissibility. We then present how this framework is applicable to previous work on persuasive robots We hope to promote a balanced view on anthropomorphic deception by design that should be neither naïve (e.g., as a default) nor exploitive (e.g., for economic benefit).

Related papers

• Hierarchical Compositionality for An Assistive AI Agent [9.152759278163954]
  AI agents are increasingly being developed to assist humans in various applications.<n>These methods are impressive predictors, but they are resource-hungry, opaque, and known to make arbitrary decisions in novel situations.<n>Our work seeks to explore the design of architectures for such AI agents based on core principles that can be traced back to the early pioneers of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T00:17:56Z)
• A Fair Objective for Human-Empowerment-Preserving AI: Desiderata, Design, and Likely Behavioral Consequences [0.4474253500122443]
  This paper explores the idea of promoting well-being and safety in human-AI interactions by forcing AI agents explicitly to empower humans.<n>We design a parametrizable and decomposable objective function for AI systems that represents an inequality- and risk-averse long-term aggregate of human power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T17:07:39Z)
• When Should an AI Act? A Human-Centered Model of Scene, Context, and Behavior for Agentic AI Design [0.44743648495907423]
  Agentic AI increasingly intervenes proactively by inferring users' situations from contextual data.<n>We propose a conceptual model that reframes behavior as an outcome integrating interpretive Scene, Context, and Human Behavior Factors.<n>We derive five agent design principles that guide intervention depth, timing, intensity, and restraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T09:56:37Z)
• Humanizing Machines: Rethinking LLM Anthropomorphism Through a Multi-Level Framework of Design [19.54520739842824]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly exhibit textbfanthropomorphism characteristics.<n>We argue that anthropomorphism should be treated as a emphconcept of design that can be intentionally tuned to support user goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T00:48:39Z)
• Evaluating AI Alignment in Eleven LLMs through Output-Based Analysis and Human Benchmarking [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in psychological research and practice, yet traditional benchmarks reveal little about the values they express in real interaction.<n>We introduce PAPERS, output-based evaluation of the values LLMs express.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T20:14:02Z)
• AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
  There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness.<n>The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z)
• Agency Is Frame-Dependent [94.91580596320331]
  Agency is a system's capacity to steer outcomes toward a goal.<n>We argue that agency is fundamentally frame-dependent.<n>We conclude that any basic science of agency requires frame-dependence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T08:34:57Z)
• Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment [109.57781720848669]
  We argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI.<n>We introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI [53.28828093836034]
  We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors.<n>This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-04T17:44:58Z)
• Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models [49.352840825419236]
  We investigate the prevalence of sycophancy in models whose finetuning procedure made use of human feedback.<n>We show that five state-of-the-art AI assistants consistently exhibit sycophancy across four varied free-form text-generation tasks.<n>Our results indicate that sycophancy is a general behavior of state-of-the-art AI assistants, likely driven in part by human preference judgments favoring sycophantic responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T14:46:48Z)
• Aligning Robot and Human Representations [50.070982136315784]
  We argue that current representation learning approaches in robotics should be studied from the perspective of how well they accomplish the objective of representation alignment. We mathematically define the problem, identify its key desiderata, and situate current methods within this formalism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T18:59:55Z)
• Enabling Morally Sensitive Robotic Clarification Requests [2.4505259300326334]
  reflexive generation of clarification requests can lead robots to miscommunicate their moral dispositions. We present a solution by performing moral reasoning on each potential disambiguation of an ambiguous human utterance. We then evaluate our method with a human subjects experiment, the results of which indicate that our approach successfully ameliorates the two identified concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T22:12:35Z)
• Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
  Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI) This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.