Political and Ideological Pressure in Software Engineering Research: The Case of DEI Backlash

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16305v1
• Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 19:35:53 GMT
• Title: Political and Ideological Pressure in Software Engineering Research: The Case of DEI Backlash
• Abstract summary: Political and ideological pressures shape global research.<n>Political and ideological pressures affect every field, including software engineering.<n>Cases of DEI backlash in SE research across three levels: macro, meso, and micro.
• Score: 44.67027301729603
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Political and ideological pressures shape global research. Recently, these pressures have become particularly visible in research related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Drastic changes in national funding and governmental guidance, especially in the US, have affected the global software engineering research ecosystem. The impacts of these pressures on research are not always direct, as they operate at multiple levels. However, what is clear is that these pressures affect every field, including software engineering (SE), despite the belief that our field is politically and ideologically neutral. In this position paper, we examine cases of political and ideological pressures on the SE research ecosystem. We investigate the community's perceptions of political and ideological pressures by analyzing community survey responses and outlining case examples of DEI backlash in SE research across three levels: macro, meso, and micro. Our research shows how recent political and ideological pressures have affected SE research across these levels, and, as a result, we propose actionable steps for the community to address these issues at different levels.

Related papers

• How Does Science Education Research Respond to Sociopolitical Change? A BERTopic Analysis of Korean Research [0.9974630621313314]
  We examine Korean science education research from 2008 to 2025.<n>We identify major topics and temporal trends, and analyze their associations with selected sociopolitical factors.<n>These patterns suggest that a topic's anchoring to policy and practice or to academic disciplines shapes how closely it tracks external change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T06:30:17Z)
• Advancing Science- and Evidence-based AI Policy [163.43609502905707]
  This paper tackles the problem of how to optimize the relationship between evidence and policy to address the opportunities and challenges of AI.<n>An increasing number of efforts address this problem by often either (i) contributing research into the risks of AI and their effective mitigation or (ii) advocating for policy to address these risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T23:20:58Z)
• Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
  A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.<n>Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z)
• Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science [159.95299889946637]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in political science tasks.<n>Political-LLM aims to advance the comprehensive understanding of integrating LLMs into computational political science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T08:47:50Z)
• Merging AI Incidents Research with Political Misinformation Research: Introducing the Political Deepfakes Incidents Database [0.0]
  The project is driven by the rise of generative AI in politics, ongoing policy efforts to address harms, and the need to connect AI incidents and political communication research. The database contains political deepfake content, metadata, and researcher-coded descriptors drawn from political science, public policy, communication, and misinformation studies. It aims to help reveal the prevalence, trends, and impact of political deepfakes, such as those featuring major political figures or events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T19:24:38Z)
• High Risk of Political Bias in Black Box Emotion Inference Models [0.0]
  This paper investigates the presence of political bias in machine learning models used for sentiment analysis (SA) in social science research. We conducted a bias audit on a Polish sentiment analysis model developed in our lab. Our findings indicate that annotations by human raters propagate political biases into the model's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T20:31:07Z)
• A Systematic Review of Echo Chamber Research: Comparative Analysis of Conceptualizations, Operationalizations, and Varying Outcomes [4.9873153106566575]
  This systematic review synthesizes research on echo chambers and filter bubbles to explore the reasons behind dissent.<n>It provides a taxonomy of conceptualizations and operationalizations, analyzing how measurement approaches and contextual factors influence outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T07:56:26Z)
• Finding the white male: The prevalence and consequences of algorithmic gender and race bias in political Google searches [0.0]
  This article proposes and tests a framework of algorithmic representation of minoritized groups in a series of four studies. First, two algorithm audits of political image searches delineate how search engines reflect and uphold structural inequalities by under- and misrepresenting women and non-white politicians. Second, two online experiments show that these biases in algorithmic representation in turn distort perceptions of the political reality and actively reinforce a white and masculinized view of politics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T05:57:03Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• "That's important, but...": How Computer Science Researchers Anticipate Unintended Consequences of Their Research Innovations [12.947525301829835]
  We show that considering unintended consequences is generally seen as important but rarely practiced. Principal barriers are a lack of formal process and strategy as well as the academic practice that prioritizes fast progress and publications. We intend for our work to pave the way for routine explorations of the societal implications of technological innovations before, during, and after the research process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T18:21:29Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.