Beyond Single-Score Ranking: Facet-Aware Reranking for Controllable Diversity in Paper Recommendation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16329v1
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 07:55:24 GMT
- Title: Beyond Single-Score Ranking: Facet-Aware Reranking for Controllable Diversity in Paper Recommendation
- Abstract summary: We present SciFACE, a reranking framework that models two independent facets: Background (what problem is studied) and Method (how it is solved)<n>On CSF, SciFACE reaches 70.63 NDCG@20 on Background (5.9 points above SPECTER) and 49.06 NDCG@20 on Method (31.1 points above SPECTER)<n>Compared with FaBLE without citation pre-training, SciFACE improves Method NDCG@20 by 4.1 points while using 5,891 labeled pairs versus 40K synthetic augmentations.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Current paper recommendation systems output a single similarity score that mixes different notions of relatedness, so users cannot specify why papers should be similar. We present SciFACE (Scientific Faceted Cross-Encoder), a reranking framework that models two independent facets: Background (what problem is studied) and Method (how it is solved). SciFACE trains two separate cross-encoders on 5,891 real seed-candidate paper pairs labeled by GPT-4o-mini with facet-specific criteria and validated against human judgments. On CSFCube, SciFACE reaches 70.63 NDCG@20 on Background (5.9 points above SPECTER) and 49.06 NDCG@20 on Method (31.1 points above SPECTER), competitive with state-of-the-art results. Compared with FaBLE without citation pre-training, SciFACE improves Method NDCG@20 by 4.1 points while using 5,891 labeled pairs versus 40K synthetic augmentations. These results show that high-quality grounded facet labels can be more data-efficient than large-scale synthetic augmentation for learning fine-grained scientific similarity.
Related papers
- Beyond QA Matching: Perturbation-Response Fingerprinting via Probability Distributions for Large Language Models [12.84004924761875]
We introduce BReF, a training-free fingerprint that compares how probability distributions over four answer-option labels A/B/C/D move under controlled perturbations.<n>On a unified benchmark with 34 checkpoints, 22 documented direct-parent relations, and 411 suspect-candidate pairs, BReF retrieves the documented parent in 22/22 cases.<n>Same-family discrimination is harder, and paired tests show a significant exact-retrieval gain over a magnitude-only Top-25 control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-06T01:35:07Z) - Comparing Retrieval Methods for Academic Advisor Discovery: A Six-Method Study of 768 CS Faculty Profiles Across 9 US Universities [0.0]
Methods span sparse lexical matching, TF-IDF, BM25, dense semantic retrieval, hybrid score fusion, and learning-to-rank.<n>We present a comparative evaluation of six information retrieval methods for the task of academic advisor discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-03T14:19:14Z) - PaperGym: Rubric-Centered Evolution for Research-Plan Generation [69.5921878728483]
We introduce PaperGym, a unified framework that turns each research paper into a complete training environment.<n>PaperGym exploits the structure of a paper: the question is synthesized from the research goal and background, while the criteria are derived from the method and experiments.<n>With the recipe held fixed, models trained on PaperGym-20k win 58.1% of three-way comparisons, against 28.2% forHub Science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-31T17:31:18Z) - Beyond Flat Labels: Level-Restricted Contrastive Learning for Hierarchical Fine-Grained Vision Classification [50.20892407648858]
Multimodal contrastive learning has enabled zero-shot visual classification by aligning images with textual categories.<n>Existing methods often produce predictions that are inconsistent across taxonomic levels.<n>We propose a group-balanced design, ensuring each taxonomic level receives adequate optimization.<n>We train our model with TreeOfLife-10M based on BioCLIP and evaluate it across multiple hierarchical classification benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-20T02:12:05Z) - When Does Synthetic Patent Data Help? Volume-Fidelity Trade-offs in Low-Resource Multi-Label Classification [0.0]
It is shown that the claimed improvements in micro F1 for BERT-for-Patents mainly reflect a volume effect.<n>A corpus that allows for improvement in classification performance up to +0.58 in raw micro F1 may adversely affect a Jaccard-overlap retrieval proxy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-22T23:49:52Z) - SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment [53.70401063640645]
We present SciCoQA, a dataset for detecting discrepancies between scientific publications and theirs.<n>Our dataset consists of 611 paper-code discrepancies (81 real, 530 synthetic), spanning diverse computational science disciplines.<n>The best performing model in our evaluation, GPT-5, can only detect 45.7% of real-world paper-code discrepancies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T10:04:33Z) - RPC-Bench: A Fine-grained Benchmark for Research Paper Comprehension [65.81339691942757]
RPC-Bench is a large-scale question-answering benchmark built from review-rebuttal exchanges of high-quality computer science papers.<n>We design a fine-grained taxonomy aligned with the scientific research flow to assess models' ability to understand and answer why, what, and how questions in scholarly contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-14T11:37:00Z) - AGNES: Adaptive Graph Neural Network and Dynamic Programming Hybrid Framework for Real-Time Nanopore Seed Chaining [0.0]
Nanopore sequencing enables real-time long-read DNA sequencing with reads exceeding 10 kilobases.<n>Inherent error rates of 12-15 percent present significant computational challenges for read alignment.<n>This paper presents RawHash3, a hybrid framework combining graph neural networks with classical dynamic programming for adaptive seed chaining.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-15T08:05:43Z) - NAIPv2: Debiased Pairwise Learning for Efficient Paper Quality Estimation [58.30936615525824]
We present NAIPv2, a debiased and efficient framework for paper quality estimation.<n> NAIPv2 employs pairwise learning within domain-year groups to reduce inconsistencies in reviewer ratings.<n>It is trained on pairwise comparisons but enabling efficient pointwise prediction at deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T17:59:23Z) - GANDiff FR: Hybrid GAN Diffusion Synthesis for Causal Bias Attribution in Face Recognition [0.0]
We introduce GANDiff FR, the first synthetic framework that precisely controls demographic and environmental factors to measure, explain, and reduce bias with reproducible rigor.<n>We synthesize 10,000 demographically balanced faces across five cohorts validated for realism via automated detection and human review.<n> Benchmarking ArcFace, CosFace, and AdaFace under matched operating points shows AdaFace reduces inter-group TPR disparity by 60%.<n>Despite around 20% computational overhead relative to pure GANs, GANDiff FR yields three times more attribute-conditioned variants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-15T09:05:57Z) - Evaluating Hybrid Retrieval Augmented Generation using Dynamic Test Sets: LiveRAG Challenge [8.680958290253914]
We present our submission to the LiveRAG Challenge 2025, which evaluates retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems on dynamic test sets.<n>Our final hybrid approach combines sparse (BM25) and dense (E5) retrieval methods.<n>We demonstrate that neural re-ranking with RankLLaMA improves MAP from 0.523 to 0.797 but introduces prohibitive computational costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-27T21:20:43Z) - JointMatch: A Unified Approach for Diverse and Collaborative
Pseudo-Labeling to Semi-Supervised Text Classification [65.268245109828]
Semi-supervised text classification (SSTC) has gained increasing attention due to its ability to leverage unlabeled data.
Existing approaches based on pseudo-labeling suffer from the issues of pseudo-label bias and error accumulation.
We propose JointMatch, a holistic approach for SSTC that addresses these challenges by unifying ideas from recent semi-supervised learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T05:43:35Z) - MarginMatch: Improving Semi-Supervised Learning with Pseudo-Margins [73.17295479535161]
MarginMatch is a new SSL approach combining consistency regularization and pseudo-labeling.
We analyze the behavior of the model on the pseudo-labeled examples as the training progresses to ensure low quality predictions are masked out.
We obtain an improvement in error rate over the state-of-the-art of 3.25% on CIFAR-100 with only 25 labels per class and of 3.78% on STL-10 using as few as 4 labels per class.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-17T15:19:04Z) - Label-Aware Hyperbolic Embeddings for Fine-grained Emotion
Classification [11.973115466838717]
Fine-grained emotion classification (FEC) is a challenging task.
FEC needs to handle subtle nuance between labels, which can be complex and confusing.
Most existing models only address text classification problem in the euclidean space.
We propose HypEmo, a novel framework that can integrate hyperbolic embeddings to improve the FEC task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-26T16:28:33Z) - Blind Face Restoration: Benchmark Datasets and a Baseline Model [63.053331687284064]
Blind Face Restoration (BFR) aims to construct a high-quality (HQ) face image from its corresponding low-quality (LQ) input.
We first synthesize two blind face restoration benchmark datasets called EDFace-Celeb-1M (BFR128) and EDFace-Celeb-150K (BFR512)
State-of-the-art methods are benchmarked on them under five settings including blur, noise, low resolution, JPEG compression artifacts, and the combination of them (full degradation)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T06:34:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.